Evaluation of a Fine Sediment Removal Tool in Spring-fed and Snowmelt Driven Streams

References

1. 1. Amundsen P.A.,
   2. Gabler H.M.,
   3. Staldvik F.

   1996. A new approach to graphical analysis of feeding strategy from stomach contents data—Modification of the Costello (1990) method. Journal of Fish Biology 48:607–614.

   OpenUrlWeb of Science
2. 1. Baxter C.V.,
   2. Fausch K.D.,
   3. Murakami M.,
   4. Chapman P.L.

   2004. Fish invasion restructures stream and forest food webs by interrupting reciprocal prey subsidies. Ecology 85:2656–2663.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Bernhardt E.S.,
   2. Sudduth E.B.,
   3. Palmer M A.,
   4. Allan J.D.,
   5. Meyer J.L.,
   6. Alexander G.,
   7. Follastad-Shah J.,
   8. Hassett B.,
   9. Jenkinson R.,
   10. Lave R.

   2007. Restoring rivers one reach at a time: Results from a survey of US river restoration practitioners. Restoration Ecology 15:482–493.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. 1. Budy P.,
   2. Wood S.,
   3. Roper B.

   2012. A Study of the Spawning Ecology and Early Life History Survival of Bonneville Cutthroat Trout. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 32:436–449.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. 1. Goode J.R.,
   2. Luce C.H.,
   3. Buffington J.M.

   2012. Enhanced sediment delivery in a changing climate in semi-arid mountain basins: Implications for water resource management and aquatic habitat in the northern Rocky Mountains. Geomorphology 139:1–15.

   OpenUrlWeb of Science
6. 1. Harvey B.C.,
   2. White J.L.,
   3. Nakamoto R.J.

   2009. The effect of deposited fine sediment on summer survival and growth of rainbow trout in riffles of a small stream. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 29:434–440.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
7. 1. Holomuzki J.R.,
   2. Hoyle J.D.

   1990. Effect of predatory fish presence on habitat use and diel movement of the stream amphipod, Gammarus minus. Freshwater Biology 24:509–517.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
8. 1. Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (IDEQ)

   . 2006. Bear River Subbasin Assessment and TMDLs.
9. 1. Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (IDEQ)

   . 2011. Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Final 2010 Integrated Report.
10. 1. Kawaguchi Y.,
    2. Nakano S.

    2001. Contribution of terrestrial invertebrates to the annual resource budget for salmonids in forest and grassland reaches of a headwater stream. Freshwater Biology 46:303–316.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
11. 1. Kawaguchi Y.,
    2. Taniguchi Y.,
    3. Nakano S.

    2003. Terrestrial invertebrate inputs determine the local abundance of stream fishes in a forested stream. Ecology 84:701–708.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. 1. Kershner J.L.

    1995. Bonneville cutthroat trout. Conservation assessment for inland cutthroat trout. US Forest Service, General Technical Report RM-256, Fort Collins, Colorado:28–35.
13. 1. Kondolf G. M.,
    2. Wilcock P.R.

    1996. The flushing flow problem: defining and evaluating objectives. Water Resources Research 32:2589–2599.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
14. 1. Mebane C.A.

    2001. Testing bioassessment metrics: Macroinvertebrate, sculpin, and salmonid responses to stream habitat, sediment, and metals. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 67:293–322.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 1. Montgomery D.R.,
    2. Buffington J.M.

    1997. Channel-reach morphology in mountain drainage basins. Geological Society of America Bulletin 109:596–611.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
16. 1. Nakano S.,
    2. Kawaguchi Y.,
    3. Taniguchi Y.,
    4. Miyasaka H.,
    5. Shibata Y.,
    6. Urabe H.,
    7. Kuhara N.

    1999a. Selective foraging on terrestrial invertebrates by rainbow trout in a forested headwater stream in northern Japan. Ecological Research 14:351–360.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
17. 1. Nakano S.,
    2. Miyasaka H.,
    3. Kuhara N.

    1999b. Terrestrial-aquatic linkages: Riparian arthropod inputs alter trophic cascades in a stream food web. Ecology 80:2435–2441.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
18. 1. Owens P.,
    2. Batalla R.,
    3. Collins A.,
    4. Gomez B.,
    5. Hicks D.,
    6. Horowitz A.,
    7. Kondolf G.,
    8. Marden M.,
    9. Page M.,
    10. Peacock D.

    2005. Fine-grained sediment in river systems: Environmental significance and management issues. River Research and Applications 21:693–717.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
19. 1. Pander J.,
    2. Mueller M.,
    3. Geist J.

    2014. A comparison of four stream substratum restoration techniques concerning interstitial conditions and downstream effects. River Research and Applications:239–255.
20. 1. Poff N.L.R.,
    2. Allan J.D.,
    3. Bain M.B.,
    4. Karr J. R.,
    5. Prestegaard K.L.,
    6. Richter B.D.,
    7. Sparks R.E.,
    8. Stromberg J.C.

    1997. The natural flow regime. BioScience 47:769–784.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
21. 1. Pope K,
    2. Kruse C.

    2007. Condition. Pages 423–471 Analysis and Interpretation of Freshwater Fisheries Data. Bethesda, Maryland, American Fisheries Society.
22. 1. Pulg U.,
    2. Barlaup B.T.,
    3. Sternecker K.,
    4. Trepl L.,
    5. Unfer G.

    2013. Restoration of spawning habitats of brown trout (Salmo trutta) in a regulated chalk stream. River Research and Applications 29:172–182.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
23. 1. Ramezani J.,
    2. Rennebeck L.,
    3. Closs G.P.,
    4. Matthaei C.D.

    2014. Effects of fine sediment addition and removal on stream invertebrates and fish: A reach-scale experiment. Freshwater Biology 59:2584–2604.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
24. 1. Roni P.,
    2. Hanson K.,
    3. Beechie T.

    2008. Global review of the physical and biological effectiveness of stream habitat rehabilitation techniques. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 28:856–890.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. 1. Rowe M.,
    2. Essig D.,
    3. Jessup B.

    2003. Guide to Selection of Sediment Targets for Use in Idaho TMDLs. Pages 1–46. Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, Boise.
26. 1. Sepulveda A.J.,
    2. Sechrist J.,
    3. Marczak L.B.

    2014. Testing Ecological Tradeoffs of a New Tool for Removing Fine Sediment in a Spring-fed Stream. Ecological Restoration 32:68–77.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
27. 1. Shackle V.J.,
    2. Hughes S.,
    3. Lewis V.T.

    1999. The influence of three methods of gravel cleaning on brown trout, Salmo trutta, egg survival. Hydrological processes 13:477–486.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
28. 1. Sternecker K.,
    2. Wild R.,
    3. Geist J.

    2013. Effects of substratum restoration on salmonid habitat quality in a subalpine stream. Environmental Biology of Fishes 96:1341–1351.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
29. 1. Sutherland A.B.,
    2. Culp J.M.,
    3. Benoy G.A.

    2010. Characterizing deposited sediment for stream habitat assessment. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods 8:30–44.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. 1. Suttle K.B.,
    2. Power M.E.,
    3. Levine J.M.,
    4. McNeely C.

    2004. How fine sediment in riverbeds impairs growth and survival of juvenile salmonids. Ecological Applications 14:969–974.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
31. 1. Syvitski J.P.,
    2. Vörösmarty C.J.,
    3. Kettner A.J.,
    4. Green P.

    2005. Impact of humans on the flux of terrestrial sediment to the global coastal ocean. Science 308:376–380.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
32. 1. Underwood A.

    1992. Beyond BACI: The detection of environmental impacts on populations in the real, but variable, world. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 161:145–178.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. 1. Wood P.J.,
    2. Armitage P.D.

    1997. Biological effects of fine sediment in the lotic environment. Environmental Management 21:203–217.

    OpenUrlGeoRefPubMedWeb of Science