Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Ecological Restoration
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Ecological Restoration

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleArticles

Evaluation of a Fine Sediment Removal Tool in Spring-fed and Snowmelt Driven Streams

Adam J. Sepulveda, Megan Layhee, Zachary A. Sutphin and Juddson D. Sechrist
Ecological Restoration, September 2015, 33 (3) 303-315; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/er.33.3.303
Adam J. Sepulveda
Corresponding author, US Geological Survey, Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center, 2327 University Way, Suite 2, Bozeman, MT 59715, .
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: asepulveda{at}usgs.gov
Megan Layhee
US Geological Survey, Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center, 2327 University Way, Suite 2, Bozeman, MT 59715.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zachary A. Sutphin
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Denver Technical Service Center, Denver, CO 80225.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juddson D. Sechrist
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Denver Technical Service Center, Denver, CO 80225.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The accumulation of fine-grained sediments impairs the structure and function of streams, so removing fine sediments may be required to achieve restoration objectives. There has been little work on methods of removing excess sediment or on the efficacy of the methods. We used a 4-year before-after-control-impact design in southeastern Idaho streams to test a fine sediment removal system (FSRS) manufactured by Streamside Environmental LLC. The FSRS agitates fine sediment in the substrate with clean pump water and then vacuums the sediment out of the stream with a second pump. Our objectives were: 1) to test if the FSRS can selectively remove fine sediment; 2) to monitor the bio-physical responses in FSRS treated and downstream waters; and 3) to compare the bio-physical responses to the FSRS in spring-fed and snowmelt driven stream reaches. The FSRS removed ~ 14 metric tons of sediment from the two treated reaches. More than 90% of this sediment was < 2 mm, indicating that the FSRS selected for fine sediment in both stream types. Sustained effects of removing this sediment were confined to substrate improvements in treated reaches. Embeddedness in the spring-fed reach decreased and subsurface grain size in spring-fed and snowmelt driven reaches increased. We did not detect any sustained invertebrate or fish responses in treated reaches or any detrimental bio-physical responses in downstream waters. These results indicate that the FSRS reduced fine sediment levels but sediment removal did not reverse the impacts of sediment accumulation to stream biota within our monitoring time frame.

  • Bonneville cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki utah)
  • embeddedness
  • invertebrate
  • particle size
  • Sand Wand system

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ecological Restoration: 33 (3)
Ecological Restoration
Vol. 33, Issue 3
1 Sep 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ecological Restoration.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of a Fine Sediment Removal Tool in Spring-fed and Snowmelt Driven Streams
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ecological Restoration
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ecological Restoration web site.
Citation Tools
Evaluation of a Fine Sediment Removal Tool in Spring-fed and Snowmelt Driven Streams
Adam J. Sepulveda, Megan Layhee, Zachary A. Sutphin, Juddson D. Sechrist
Ecological Restoration Sep 2015, 33 (3) 303-315; DOI: 10.3368/er.33.3.303

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Evaluation of a Fine Sediment Removal Tool in Spring-fed and Snowmelt Driven Streams
Adam J. Sepulveda, Megan Layhee, Zachary A. Sutphin, Juddson D. Sechrist
Ecological Restoration Sep 2015, 33 (3) 303-315; DOI: 10.3368/er.33.3.303
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Choosing Plant Diversity Metrics: A Tallgrass Prairie Case Study
  • A Conceptual Planning Framework to Improve Integration of Reclamation with Site Remediation
  • Genetic Diversity, Mating System, and Reproductive Output of Restored Melaleuca acuminata Populations are Comparable to Natural Remnant Populations
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Bonneville cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki utah)
  • embeddedness
  • invertebrate
  • particle size
  • Sand Wand system
UW Press logo

© 2025 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire