Responses of Narrowleaf Cattail (Typha angustifolia) to Combinations of Salinity and Nutrient Additions: Implications for Coastal Marsh Restoration

References

1. 1. Awad A.S.,
   2. Edwards D.G.,
   3. Campbell L.C.

   1990. Phosphorus enhancement of salt tolerance of tomato. Crop Science 30: 123–128.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. 1. Barrett N.E.,
   2. Niering W.A.

   1993. Tidal marsh restoration: Trends in vegetation change using a geographical information system (GIS). Restoration Ecology 1:18–28.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
3. 1. Boumans R.M.J.,
   2. Burdick D.M.,
   3. Dionne M.

   2002. Modeling habitat change in salt marshes after tidal restoration. Restoration Ecology 10:543–555.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. 1. Buchsbaum R.N.,
   2. Catena J.,
   3. Hutchins E.,
   4. James-Pirri M.J.

   2006. Changes in salt marsh vegetation, Phragmites australis, and nekton in response to increased tidal flushing in a New England salt marsh. Wetlands 26:544–557.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
5. 1. Crain C.M.,
   2. Silliman B.R.,
   3. Bertness S.L.,
   4. Bertness M.D.

   2004. Physical and biotic drivers of plant distribution across estuarine salinity gradients. Ecology 85:2539–2549.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. 1. Craft C.,
   2. Krull K.,
   3. Graham S.

   2007. Ecological indicators of nutrient enrichment, freshwater wetlands, Midwestern United States (US). Ecological Indicators 7:733–750.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
7. 1. Crites R.W.,
   2. Middlebrooks E.J.,
   3. Bastian R.K.

   2014. Natural Wastewater Treatment Systems. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
8. 1. Dai J.L.,
   2. Duan L.S.,
   3. Dong H.Z.

   2013. Improved nutrient uptake enhances cotton growth and salinity tolerance in saline media. Journal of Plant Nutrition 37:1269–1286.

   OpenUrl
9. 1. Doren R.F.,
   2. Armentano T.V.,
   3. Whiteaker L.D.,
   4. Jones R.D.

   1997. Marsh vegetation patterns and soil phosphorus gradients in the Everglades ecosystem. Aquatic Botany 56:145–163.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
10. 1. Grace J.B.

    1988. The effects of nutrient additions on mixtures of Typha latifolia L. and Typha domingensis pers. along a water-depth gradient. Aquatic Botany 31:83–92.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. 1. Hutchinson I

    1988. Salinity tolerance of plants of estuarine wetlands and associated uplands. Vancouver, British Columbia: Simon Fraser University, Washington State Shorelands and Coastal Zone Management Program: Wetlands Section.
12. 1. Kaya C.,
    2. Tuna A.L.,
    3. Ashraf M.,
    4. Altunlu H.

    2007. Improved salt tolerance of melon (Cucumis melo L.) by the addition of pro-line and potassium nitrate. Environmental and Experimental Botany 60:397–403.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. 1. Konisky R.A.,
    2. Burdick D.M.

    2004. Effects of stressors on invasive and halophytic plants of New England salt marshes: A framework for predicting response to tidal restoration. Wetlands 24:434–447.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
14. 1. Lamers L.P.,
    2. Govers L.L.,
    3. Janssen I.C.,
    4. Geurts J.J.,
    5. Van der Welle M.E.,
    6. Van Katwijk M.M.,
    7. Van der Heide T. 1.,
    8. Roelofs J.G.M.,
    9. Smolders A.J.P.

    2013. Sulfide as a soil phytotoxin—a review. Frontiers in Plant Science 4:1–14.

    OpenUrlPubMed
15. 1. Macek P.,
    2. Rejmánková E.

    2007. Response of emergent macrophytes to experimental nutrient and salinity additions. Functional Ecology 21:478–488.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. 1. McMillan C.

    1959. Salt tolerance within a Typha population. American Journal of Botany 46:521–526.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. 1. Niering W.A.

    1997. Tidal wetlands restoration and creation along the east coast of North America. Restoration ecology and sustainable development. In Urbanska K.M., Webb N.R., Edwards P.J. (eds) Restoration Ecology and Sustainable Development, pp. 259–285. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
18. 1. Okusanya O.T.,
    2. Ungar I.A.

    1984. The growth and mineral composition of three species of Spergularia as affected by salinity and nutrients at high salinity. American Journal of Botany 71:439–447.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. 1. Philip C.C.,
    2. Brown R.G.

    1965. Ecological studies of transition-zone vascular plants in South River, Maryland. Chesapeake Science 6:73–81.

    OpenUrl
20. 1. Portnoy J.W.,
    2. Giblin A.E.

    1997. Effects of historic tidal restrictions on salt marsh sediment chemistry. Biogeochemistry 36:275–303.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
21. 1. Roman C.T.,
    2. Raposa K.B.,
    3. Adamowicz S.C.,
    4. James-Pirri M.J.,
    5. G J.

    2002. Quantifying vegetation and nekton response to tidal restoration of a New England salt marsh. Restoration Ecology 10:450–460.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. 1. Shekov A.G.

    1974. Effect of salinization of hydromacrophytes of Kuan Limans. Soviet Journal of Ecology 5:450–454.

    OpenUrl
23. 1. Shih J.G.,
    2. Finkelstein SA S.A.

    2008. Range dynamics and invasive tendencies in Typha latifolia and Typha angustifolia in eastern North America derived from herbarium and pollen records. Wetlands 28:1–16.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
24. 1. Sincrope T.L.,
    2. Hine P.G.,
    3. Warren R.S.,
    4. Niering W.A.

    1990. Restoration of an impounded salt marsh in New England. Estuaries 13:25–30.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
25. 1. Smith S.M.,
    2. Portnoy J.W.

    2004. 2003 Salt marsh vegetation monitoring report, Cape Cod National Seashore. NPS Technical Report. Cape Cod National Seashore, Wellfeet, MA.
26. 1. Steinbachová-Vojtíšková L.,
    2. Tylová E.,
    3. Soukup A.,
    4. Novická H.,
    5. Votrubová O.,
    6. Lipavská H.,
    7. H. Čížková H.

    2006. Influence of nutrient supply on growth, carbohydrate, and nitrogen metabolic relations in Typha angustifolia. Environmental and Experimental Botany 57:246–257.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
27. 1. Swamy V.,
    2. Fell P.E.,
    3. Body M.,
    4. Keaney M.B.,
    5. Nyaku M.K.,
    6. McIlvain E.C.,
    7. Keen A.L.

    2002. Macroinvertebrate and fish populations in a restored impounded salt marsh 21 years after the reestablishment of tidal flooding. Environmental Management 29:516–530.

    OpenUrlPubMed
28. 1. Whigham D.F.,
    2. Jordan T.E.,
    3. Miklas J.

    1989. Biomass and resource allocation of Typha angustifolia L.(Typhaceae): The effect of within and between year variations in salinity. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 116:364–370.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
29. 1. Weiner S.E.

    1993. Long-term competitive displacement of Typha latifolia by Typha angustifolia in a eutrophic lake. Oecologia 94: 451–456.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
30. 1. Woo I.,
    2. Zedler J.B.

    2002. Can nutrients alone shift a sedge meadow towards dominance by the invasive Typha × glauca. Wetlands 22:509–521.

    OpenUrlCrossRef