Long-term Herbivore Exclusion for Recovery of Buckbrush (Ceanothus fendleri ) Populations During Restoration of Ponderosa Pine Forests in Northern Arizona

References

1. 1. Allen C.D.

   1996. Elk response to the La Mesa fire and current status in the Jemez Mountains. Pages 179–195 in Allen C.D. (ed), Proceedings of the 2nd La Mesa Fire Symposium. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-GTR-286.
2. 1. Allen C.D.,
   2. Savage M.,
   3. Faulk D.A.,
   4. Suckling K.F.,
   5. Swetnam T.W.,
   6. Schulke T.,
   7. Stacey P.B.,
   8. Morgan P.,
   9. Hoffman M.,
   10. Klingel J.T.

   2002. Ecological restoration of southwestern ponderosa pine ecosystems: Abroad perspective. Ecological Applications 12:1418–1433.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Chancellor W.W.,
   2. Huffman D.W.,
   3. Moore M.M.

   2008. Characteristics of buckbrush shrubs exposed to herbivores after seven years of protection. Pages 171–175 in Olberding S.D., Moore M.M. (tech coords), Fort Valley Experimental Forest—a century of research 1908–2008. USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-53CD.
4. 1. Conard S.G.,
   2. Jaramillo A.E.,
   3. Cromack K. Jr..,
   4. Rose S.

   1985. The role of the genus Ceanothus in western forest ecosystems. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-182.
5. 1. Covington W.W.,
   2. Moore M.M.

   1994. Southwestern ponderosa forest structure and resource conditions: changes since Euro-American settlement. Journal of Forestry 92:39–47.

   OpenUrl
6. 1. Covington W.W.,
   2. Fulé P.Z.,
   3. Moore M.M.,
   4. Hart S.C.,
   5. Kolb T.E.,
   6. Mast J.N.,
   7. Sackett S.S.,
   8. Wagner M.R.

   1997. Restoring ecosystem health in ponderosa pine forests of the Southwest. Journal of Forestry 95:23–29.

   OpenUrl
7. 1. Fletcher J.D.,
   2. Shipley L.A.,
   3. McShea W.J.,
   4. Shumway D.L.

   2001. Wildlife and rare plantces: the effects of white-tailed deer, rodents, and insects on growth and survival of Turk’s cap lily. Biological Conservation 101:229–238.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
8. 1. Fulé P.Z.,
   2. McHugh C.,
   3. Heinlein T.A.,
   4. Covington W.W.

   2001. Potential fire behavior is reduced following forest restoration treatments. Pages 28–35 in Vance R.K., Edminster C.B., Covington W.W., Blake J.A. (comps), Ponderosa pine ecosystems restoration and conservation: Steps toward stewardship. USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-22.
9. 1. Fulé P.Z.,
   2. Covington W.W.,
   3. Smith H.B.,
   4. Springer J.D.,
   5. Heinlein T.A.,
   6. Huisinga K.D.,
   7. Moore M.M.

   2002. Comparing restoration alternatives: Grand Canyon, Arizona. Forest Ecology and Management 170:19–41.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. 1. Hanley M.E.,
    2. Lamont B.B.,
    3. Fairbanks M.M.,
    4. Rafferty C.M.

    2007. Plant structural traits and their role in anti-herbivore defense. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 8:167–178.

    OpenUrl
11. 1. Huffman D.W.,
    2. Moore M.M.

    2003. Ungulate herbivory on buckbrush in an Arizona ponderosa pine forest. Journal of Range Management 56:358–363.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. 1. Huffman D.W.,
    2. Moore M.M.

    2004. Responses of Fendler ceanothus to overstory thinning, prescribed fire, and drought in an Arizona ponderosa pine forest. Forest Ecology and Management 198:105–115.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. 1. Huffman D.W.

    2006. Production, losses, and germination of Ceanothus fendleri seeds in an Arizona ponderosa pine forest. Western North American Naturalist 66:365–373.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
14. 1. Huffman D.W.,
    2. Moore M.M.

    2008. Dynamics of buckbrush populations under simulated forest restoration alternatives. Pages 257–263 in Olberding S.D., Moore M.M. (tech coords), Fort Valley Experimental Forest—A century of research 1908–2008. USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-53CD.
15. 1. Huffman D.W.,
    2. Laughlin D.C.,
    3. Pearson K.M.,
    4. Pandey S.

    2009. Effects of herbivores and shrub characteristics on arthropod assemblages in a northern Arizona forest ecosystem. Forest Ecology and Management 258:616–625.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. 1. Kearney T.H.,
    2. Peebles R.H.

    1964. Arizona Flora. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
17. 1. Kolb T.E.,
    2. Wagner M.R.,
    3. Covington W.W.

    1994. Concepts of forest health. Journal of Forestry 92:10–15.

    OpenUrl
18. 1. Laughlin D.C.,
    2. Bakker J.D.,
    3. Daniels M.L.,
    4. Moore M.M.,
    5. Casey C.A.,
    6. Springer J.D.

    2008. Restoring plant species diversity and community composition in a ponderosa pine-bunchgrass ecosystem. Plant Ecology 197:139–151.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. 1. Massad T.J.

    2013. Ontogenetic differences of herbivory on woody and herbaceous plants: A meta-analysis demonstrating unique effects of herbivory on the young and the old, the slow and the fast. Oecologia 172:1–10.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 1. Maschinski J.,
    2. Whitham T.G.

    1989. The continuum of plant responses to herbivory: The influence of plant association, nutrient availability, and timing. The American Midland Naturalist 134:1–19.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
21. 1. McGlone C.M.,
    2. Springer J.D.,
    3. Laughlin D.C.

    2009. Can pine forest restoration promote a diverse and abundant understory and simultaneously resist nonnative invasion? Forest Ecology and Management 258:2638–2646.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. 1. Moore M.M.,
    2. Covington W.W.,
    3. Fulé P.Z.

    1999. Reference conditions and ecological restoration: A southwestern ponderosa pine perspective. Ecological Applications 9:1266–1277.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. 1. Moore M.M.,
    2. Casey C.A.,
    3. Bakker J.D.,
    4. Springer J.D.,
    5. Fulé P.Z.,
    6. Covington W.W.,
    7. Laughlin D.C.

    2006. Herbaceous vegetation responses (1992–2004) to restoration treatments in a ponderosa pine forest. Rangeland Ecology and Management 59:135–144.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
24. 1. Neter J.,
    2. Wasserman W.,
    3. Kutner M.H.

    1989. Applied Linear Regression Models. Boston, MA: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
25. 1. Obeso J.R.

    1993. Does defoliation affect reproductive output in herbaceous perennials and woody plants in different ways? Functional Ecology 7:150–155.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
26. 1. Patton D.R.

    1974. Patch cutting increases deer and elk use of a pine forest in Arizona. Journal of Forestry 72:764–766.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
27. 1. Pimm S.L.

    1994. Biodiversity and the balance of nature. Pages 347–359 in Schulze E.D., Mooney H.A. (eds), Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
28. 1. Reynolds H.G.

    1964. Effect of logging on understory vegetation and deer use in a ponderosa pine forest of Arizona. USDA Forest Service Research Note 80.
29. 1. Rooney T.P.,
    2. Waller D.M.

    2003. Direct and indirect effects of white-tailed deer in forest ecosystems. Forest Ecology and Management 181:165–176.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. 1. SEINet

    . 2004. www.swbiodiversity.org.
31. 1. Sheppard W.D.,
    2. Fairweather M.L.

    1994. Impact of large ungulates in restoration of aspen communities in a southwestern ponderosa pine ecosystem. Pages 344–347 in Covington W.W., De Bano L.F. (eds), Sustainable ecological systems: Implementing an ecological approach to land management. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-247.
32. 1. Stoddard M.T.,
    2. McGlone C.M.,
    3. Fulé P.Z.,
    4. Laughlin D.C.,
    5. Daniels M.L.

    2011. Native plants dominate understory vegetation following ponderosa pine restoration treatments. Western North American Naturalist 71:206–214.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
33. 1. Story M.T.

    1974. Nitrogen fixation by Ceanothus fendleri and Lupinus argenteus as a function of parent material and vegetal cover. MS thesis, University of Arizona.
34. 1. Urness P.J.,
    2. Neff D.J.,
    3. Watkins R.K.

    1975. Nutritive value of mule deer forages on ponderosa pine summer range in Arizona. USDA Forest Service Research Note RM-304.
35. 1. Vose J.M.,
    2. White A.S.

    1987. Process of understory seedling recruitment 1 year after prescribed fire in an Arizona ponderosa pine community. Canadian Journal of Botany 65:2280–2290.

    OpenUrl
36. 1. Vose J.M.,
    2. White A.S.

    1991. Biomass response mechanisms of understory species the first year after prescribed burning in an Arizona ponderosapine community. Forest Ecology and Management 40:175–187.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
37. 1. Whelan R.J.

    1995. The Ecology of Fire. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.