Prey Capture Success by Established and Introduced Populations of the Venus Flytrap (Dionaea muscipula)

References

1. 1. Brewer J.S.

   1999. Short-term effects of fire and competition on growth and plasticity of the yellow pitcher plant, Sarracenia alata (Sarraceniaceae). American Journal of Botany 86:1264–1271.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
2. 1. Brewer J.S.

   2003. Why don’t carnivorous pitcher plants compete with non-carnivorous plants for nutrients? Ecology 84:451–462.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Brewer J.S.

   2005. The lack of favorable responses of an endangered pitcher plant to habitat restoration. Restoration Ecology 13:710–717.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. 1. Chesser J.D.,
   2. Brewer J.S.

   2011. Factors influencing seedling recruitment in a critically endangered pitcher plant, Sarracenia rubra ssp. alabamensis. Endangered Species Research 13:245–252.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
5. 1. Cumberland M.S.,
   2. Kirkman L.K.

   2012. The effects of disturbance on the red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta) and the native ant community. Forest Ecology and Management 279:27–33.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. 1. Davidson D.W.

   2005. Ecological stoichiometry of ants in a New World rain forest. Oecologia 142:221–231.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
7. 1. Fagan W.F.,
   2. Siemann E.,
   3. Mitter C.,
   4. Denno R.F.,
   5. Huberty A.F.,
   6. Woods H.A.,
   7. Elser J.J.

   2002. Nitrogen in insects: Implications for trophic complexity and species diversification. The American Naturalist 160:784–802.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 1. Gibson T.C.,
   2. Waller D.M.

   2009. Evolving Darwin’s ‘most wonderful’ plant: Ecological steps to a snap trap. New Phytologist 183:575–587.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 1. Givnish T.J.,
   2. Burkhardt E.L.,
   3. Happel R.E.,
   4. Weintraub J.D.

   1984.Carnivory in the bromeliad Brocchinia reducta, with a cost/benefit model for the general restriction of carnivorous plants to sunny, moist, nutrient-poor habitats. The American Naturalist 124:479–497.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. 1. Godefroid S.,
    2. Piazza C.,
    3. Rossi G.,
    4. Buord S.,
    5. Stevens A.-D.,
    6. Aguraiuja R.,
    7. Cowell C.,
    8. Weekley C.W.,
    9. Vogg G.,
    10. Iriondo J.M.,
    11. Johnson I.,
    12. Dixon B.,
    13. Gordon D.,
    14. Magnanon S.,
    15. Valentin B.,
    16. Bjureke K.,
    17. Koopman R.,
    18. Vicens M.,
    19. Virevaire M.,
    20. Vanderborght T.

    2011. How successful are plant species reintroductions? Biological Conservation 144:672–682.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. 1. Gotelli N.J.,
    2. Ellison A.M.

    2004. A Primer of Ecological Statistics. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
12. 1. Greenberg C.H.,
    2. McGrane A.

    1996. A comparison of relative abundance and biomass of ground-dwelling arthropods under different forest management practices. Forest Ecology and Management 89:31–41.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. 1. Hobbs R.J.,
    2. Norton D.A.

    1996. Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 4:93–110.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. 1. Hutchens J.J.,
    2. Luken J.O.

    2009. Prey capture in the Venus flytrap: Collection or selection? Botany 87:1007–1010.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. 1. Jennings D.E.,
    2. Edwards G.B.,
    3. Rohr J.R.

    2012. Associations among ground-surface spiders (Araneae) and other arthropods in mesic flatwoods. Florida Entomologist 95:290–296.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. 1. Jennings D.E.,
    2. Rohr J.R.

    2011. A review of the conservation threats to carnivorous plants. Biological Conservation 144:1356–1363.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. 1. Jeschke J.M.,
    2. Kopp M.,
    3. Tollrian R.

    2004. Consumer-food systems: Why Type I functional responses are exclusive to filter feeders. Biological Reviews 79:337–349.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
18. 1. Luken J.O.

    2005. Dionaea muscipula (Venus Flytrap) establishment, release, and response of associated species in mowed patches on the rims of Carolina bays. Restoration Ecology 13:678–684.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. 1. Luken J.O.

    2007. Performance of Dionaea muscipula as influenced by developing vegetation. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 134:45–52.

    OpenUrl
20. 1. Luken J.O.

    2012. Long-term outcomes of Venus Flytrap (Dionaea muscipula) establishment. Restoration Ecology 20:669–670.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
21. 1. Menz M.H.M.,
    2. Phillips R.D.,
    3. Winfree R.,
    4. Kremen C.,
    5. Aizen M.A.,
    6. Johnson S.D.,
    7. Dixon K.W.

    2011. Reconnecting plants and pollinators: Challenges in the restoration of pollination mutualisms. Trends in Plant Science 16:4–12.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 1. Schulze W.,
    2. Schulze E.D.,
    3. Schulze I.,
    4. Oren R.

    2001. Quantification of insect nitrogen utilization by the venus fly trap Dionaea muscipula catching prey with highly variable isotope signatures. Journal of Experimental Botany 52:1041–1049.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
23. 1. Wortley L.,
    2. Hero J.M.,
    3. Howes M.

    2013. Evaluating ecological restoration success: A review of the literature. Restoration Ecology 21:537–543.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
24. 1. Zedler J.B.

    1993. Canopy architecture of planted and natural cordgrass marshes: Selecting habitat evaluation criteria. Ecological Applications 3:123–138.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science