Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Ecological Restoration
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Ecological Restoration

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleEducation

Novel Landscapes: Challenges and Opportunities for Educating Future Ecological Designers and Restoration Practitioners

Sarah E. Dooling
Ecological Restoration, March 2015, 33 (1) 96-110; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/er.33.1.96
Sarah E. Dooling
Community and Regional Planning, Landscape Architecture, The School of Architecture, The University of Texas, 310 Inner Campus Drive B7500, Austin, TX 78712, .
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sarah.dooling{at}utexas.edu
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

    1. Agee J.
    1996. Achieving conservation biology objectives with fire in the Pacific Northwest. Weed Technology 10:417–421.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
    1. Ahern J.F.
    1999. Spatial concepts, planning strategies, and future scenarios: A framework methods for integrating landscape ecology and landscape planning. Pages 175–201 in Klopatek J.M., et al. (eds), Landscape Ecological Analysis. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
    1. Aitken S.N.,
    2. Yeaman S.,
    3. Holliday J.A.,
    4. Wang T.,
    5. Curtis-McLane S.
    2008. Adaptation, migration or extirpation: Climate outcomes for tree populations. Evolutionary Application 1:95–111.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Allen C.R.,
    2. Fontaine J.J.,
    3. Pope K.L.,
    4. Garmestani A.S.
    2011. Adaptive management for a turbulent future. Nebraska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit—Staff Publications. Paper 80.
    1. Aplet G.,
    2. Keeton W.S.
    1999. Application of historical range of variability concepts to biodiversity conservation. Pages 71–86 in Baydack R.K., Campa H., Haufler J.B. (eds), Practical Approaches to the Conservation of Biological Diversity. New York, NY: Island Press.
    1. Armstrong H.
    1999. Design studios as research: An emerging paradigm for landscape architecture. Landscape Review 5:5–25.
    OpenUrl
    1. Austin Water Utlity
    . No date. Waterwise Landscape Rebate. http://www.austintexas.gov/department/waterwise-landscape-rebate.
    1. Barreteau O.,
    2. LePage G.
    2007. Contribution of simulation and gaming to natural resource management issues: An introduction. Simulation & Gaming 38:185–194.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Berkhout F.,
    2. Hertin J.,
    3. Jordan A.
    2002. Socio-economic future in climate change impact assessment: Using scenarios as ‘learning machines’. Global Environmental Change 12:83–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Biggs R.,
    2. Dibel M.,
    3. Gilroy D.,
    4. Kamarainen A.,
    5. Kornis M.,
    6. Preston N.,
    7. Schmitz J.,
    8. Uejio C.,
    9. Van de Bogert M.,
    10. Weidel B.,
    11. West P.,
    12. Zaks D.,
    13. Carpenter S.
    2010. Preparing for the future: Teaching scenario planning at the graduate level. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment 8:267–273.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Bloom A.L.
    2002. Teaching about relict, no-analog landscapes. Geomorphology 47:303–311.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
    1. Brewer C.A.,
    2. Gorss L.J.
    2003. Training ecologists to think with uncertainty in mind. Ecology 84:1412–1414.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Bullock J.M.,
    2. Aronson J.,
    3. Newton A. C.,
    4. Pywell R.F.,
    5. Rey-Benayas J.M.
    2011. Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: Conflicts and opportunities. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 26:541–549.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Chang A.Y.
    2009. Playing the environment: Game as virtual ecologies. In Proceedings of the Digital Arts and Culture Conference 2009. UC Irvine: Digital Arts and Culture 2009. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/46h442ng.
    1. Chapin F.S.,
    2. Lovecraft A.L.,
    3. Zavaleta E.S.,
    4. Nelson J.,
    5. Robards M.D.,
    6. Kofinas G.P.,
    7. Trainer S.F.,
    8. Peterson G.D.,
    9. Huntington H.P.,
    10. Naylor R.L.
    2006. Policy strategies to address sustainability of Alaskan boreal forests in response to a directionally changing climate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 103:16637–16643.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Choi Y.D.
    2007. Restoration to the future: A call for a new paradigm. Restoration Ecology 15:351–353.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Christensen N.L.,
    2. Bartuska A.M.,
    3. Brown J.H.,
    4. Carpenter S.,
    5. D’Antonio C.,
    6. Francis R.,
    7. Franklin J.F.,
    8. MacMahon J.A.,
    9. Noss R.,
    10. Parsons D.,
    11. Peterson C.,
    12. Tuner M.G.,
    13. Woodhouse R.G.
    1996. The Report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem Management. Ecological Applications 6:665–691.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Curran W.,
    2. Hamilton T.
    2012. Just green enough: Contesting environmental gentrification in Greenpoint, Brooklyn. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability 17:1027–1042.
    OpenUrl
    1. Daily G.C.
    (ed). 1997. Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
    1. Davis MA.,
    2. Chew M.K.,
    3. Hobbs R.J.,
    4. Lugo A.E.,
    5. Ewel J.J.,
    6. Vermeij G.J.,
    7. Brown J.H.,
    8. Rosenzweig M.L.,
    9. Gardener M.R.,
    10. Carroll S.P.,
    11. Thompson K.,
    12. Pickett S.T.A.,
    13. Stromberg J.C.,
    14. Del Tredici P.,
    15. Suding K.N.,
    16. Ehrenfeld J.G.,
    17. Grime J.P.,
    18. Mascaro J.,
    19. Briggs J.C.
    2011. Don’t judge species on their origins. Nature 474:153–154.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. De Groot R.S.,
    2. Wilson M.A.,
    3. Boumans R.M.J.
    2002. A typology for the description, classification and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics 41:393–408.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Deming M,
    2. Swaffield S.
    2011. Landscape Architecture Research: Inquiry, Strategy and Design. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
    1. Dooling S.E.
    2009. Ecological gentrification: A research agenda exploring justice in the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 33:621–639.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Egan D,
    2. Howell E.A.
    (eds). 2001. The Historical Ecology Handbook. Washington DC: Island Press.
    1. Egoh B.,
    2. Reyers B.,
    3. Rouget M.,
    4. Richardson D.M.,
    5. Le Maitre D.C.,
    6. van Jaarsveld A. S.
    2008. Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 127:135–140.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Elliot R
    . 1997. Faking nature: The Ethics of Environmental Restoration. London, UK: Routledge.
    1. Elmqvist T.,
    2. Folke C.,
    3. Nyström M.,
    4. Peterson G.,
    5. Bengtsson J.,
    6. Walker B.,
    7. Norberg J.
    2003. Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1:488–494.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Ewel J.J.,
    2. Putz F.E.
    2004. A place for alien species in ecosystem restoration. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2:354–360.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Felson A.J.,
    2. Pickett S.T.A.
    2005. Designed experiments: New approaches to studying urban ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 3:549–556.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Felson A.J.,
    2. Oldfield E.E.,
    3. Bradford M.A.
    2013. Involving ecologists in shaping large-scale green infrastructure projects. BioScience 63:882–890.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Fischer L.K.,
    2. von der Lippe M.,
    3. Rilling M. C.,
    4. Kowarik I.
    2014. Creating novel urban grasslands by reintroducing native species in wasteland vegetation. Biological Conservation 199:119–126.
    OpenUrl
    1. Foley J.A.,
    2. DeFries R.,
    3. Asner G.P.,
    4. Barford C.,
    5. Bonan G.,
    6. Carpenter S.R.,
    7. Chapin F.S.,
    8. Coe M.T.,
    9. Daily G.C.,
    10. Gibbs H.K.,
    11. Helkowski J.H.,
    12. Holloway T.,
    13. Howard E.A.,
    14. Kucharik C.J.,
    15. Monfreda C.,
    16. Patz J.A.,
    17. Prentice C.,
    18. Ramankutty N.,
    19. Snyder P.
    2005. Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570–574.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Ford E.D.
    2000. Scientific Methods for Ecological Research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    1. Fry G.L.
    2007. Multifunctional landscapes—towards transdisciplinary research. Landscape and Urban Planning 57:159–168.
    OpenUrl
    1. Fuller M.M.,
    2. Gross L.J.,
    3. Duke-Sylvester S.M.,
    4. Palmer M.
    2008. Testing the Robustness of Management Decisions to Uncertainty: Everglades Restoration Scenarios. Ecological Applications 18:711–723.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Gilman S.E.,
    2. Urban M.C.,
    3. Tewsbury J.,
    4. Gilchrist G.W.,
    5. Holt R.D.
    2010. A framework for community interactions under climate change. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25:325–331.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Gleason H.
    1926. The individualistic concept of plant association. Bulletin of the Torrey Botany Club 53:7–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Gobster P.H.,
    2. Hull R.B.
    (eds). 2000. Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
    1. Gomez-Baggethun E.,
    2. Perez M.R.
    2011. Economic valuation and the commodification of ecosystem services. Progress in Physical Geography 35:613–628.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Graham R.W.
    1986. Response of mammalian communities to environmental changes during the late Quaternary. Pages 300–313 in Diamond J., Case T. (eds), Community Ecology. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
    1. Gurevitch J.,
    2. Padilla D.K.
    2004. Are invasive species major cause of extinctions? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19:470–474.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Hallett L.M,
    2. Standish R.J.,
    3. Hulvey K.B.,
    4. Gardener M.R.,
    5. Suding K.N.,
    6. Starzomski B.M.,
    7. Murphy S.D.,
    8. Harris J.A.
    2013. Towards a conceptual framework for novel ecosystems. Pages 16–28 in Hobbs R.J, Higgs E.S., Hall C.M. (eds). Novel Ecosystems: Intervening in the New Ecological World Order. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    1. Harms B.,
    2. Knaapen J.P.,
    3. Rademaker J.G.
    1993. Landscape planning for nature restoration: Comparing regional scenarios. Pages 197–218 in Vos C.C., Opdam P. (eds), Landscape Ecology of a Stressed Environment. London, UK: Chapman and Hall.
    1. Harvey D
    . 1996. Justice, Nature, and the Geography of Difference. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
    1. Heynen N.,
    2. Perkins H.A.,
    3. Roy P.
    2006. The political ecology of uneven urban green space. Urban Affairs Review 42:3–25.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Higgs E.S.
    2012. Changing nature: Novel ecosystems, intervention, and knowing when to step back. Pages 383–398 in Weinstein M.P., Turner R.E. (eds). Sustainability Science: The Emerging Paradigm and the Urban Environment. New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media.
    1. Higgs E.S.
    2003. Nature by Design: People, Natural Processes and Ecological restoration. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    1. Higgs E.S.
    1997. What is good ecological restoration? Conservation Biology 11:338–348.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Hobbs R.J.,
    2. Arico S.,
    3. Aronson J.,
    4. Baron J.S.,
    5. Birdgewater P.,
    6. Cramer V.A.,
    7. Epstein P.R.,
    8. Ewel J.J.,
    9. Klink C.A.,
    10. Lugo A.E.,
    11. Norton D.,
    12. Ojima D.,
    13. Richardson D.M.,
    14. Sanderson E.W.,
    15. Valladares F.,
    16. Vila M.,
    17. Zamora R.,
    18. Zobel M.
    2006. Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Global Ecology and Biogeography 15:1–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Hobbs R.J.,
    2. Hallett L.M.,
    3. Ehrlich P.R.,
    4. Mooney H.A.
    2011. Intervention ecology: Applying ecological science in the twenty-first century. BioScience 61:442–450.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Hobbs R.J.,
    2. Higgs E.S.,
    3. Hall C.M.
    2013. Defining novel ecosystems. Pages 58–60 in Hobbs R.J., Higgs E.S., Hall C.M. (eds), Novel Ecosystems: Intervening in the New Ecological World Order. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    1. Hobbs R.J.,
    2. Higgs E.S.,
    3. Harris J.A.
    2009. Novel ecosystems: implications for conservation and restoration. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24: 599–605.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Hoffman W.A.,
    2. Jackson R.B.
    2000. Vegetation-climate feedback in the conversion of tropical savanna to grassland. Journal of Climate 13:1593–1602.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Hooper D.U.,
    2. Chapin F.S.,
    3. Ewel J.J.,
    4. Hector A.,
    5. Lavorel S.,
    6. Lawton J.H.,
    7. Lodge D.M.,
    8. Loreau M.,
    9. Naeem S.,
    10. Schmid B.,
    11. Setala H.,
    12. Symsad A.J.,
    13. Vandermeer J.,
    14. Wardle D.A.
    2005. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: A consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs 75:3–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Hunter M.C.,
    2. Hunter M.D.
    2008. Designing for conservation of insects in the built environment. Insect Conservation and Diversity 1:189–196.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
    1. Hunter M.C.
    2011. Using ecological theory to guide urban planting design: An adaptation strategy for climate change. Landscape Journal 30:2–11.
    OpenUrl
    1. Huntley B.,
    2. Webb T.
    1989. Migration: species’ response to climatic variations caused by changes in the earth’s orbit. Journal of Biogeography 16:5–19.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Jax K.
    2005. Function and “functioning” in ecology: What does it mean? Oikos 111:641–648.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Jones T.A.
    2013. Plant material for novel ecosystems. Pages 212–227 in Hobbs R.J., Higgs E.S., Hall C.M. (eds), Novel Ecosystems: Intervening in the New Ecological World Order. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    1. Joshi J.,
    2. Schmid B.,
    3. Calderia M.C.,
    4. Dimitrakopoulos P.G.,
    5. Good J.,
    6. Harris R.,
    7. Hector A.,
    8. Huss-Danell K.,
    9. Jumpponen A.,
    10. Minns A.,
    11. Mulder C.P.,
    12. Pereira J.S.,
    13. Prinz A.,
    14. Scherer-Lorenzen M.,
    15. Siamantziouras A-S. D.,
    16. Terry A.C.,
    17. Troublis A.Y.,
    18. Lawton J.H.
    2001. Local adaptation enhances performance of common plant species. Ecology Letters 4:536–544.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Johnson B.R.,
    2. Sibernagel J.,
    3. Hostetler M.,
    4. Mills A.,
    5. Ndubisi F.,
    6. Fife E.,
    7. Hunter M.C.
    2002. The nature and dialogue and the dialogue of nature: Designers and ecologists in collaboration. Pages 305–356 in Johnson B.R., Hill K.Z. (eds), Ecology and Design: Frameworks for Learning. Washington, DC: Island Press.
    1. Katz E.
    1991. The ethical significance of human intervention in nature. Ecological Restoration 9:90–96.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Keane R.E.,
    2. Hessburg P.F.,
    3. Landres P.B.,
    4. Swanson F.J.
    2009. The use of historical range and variability (HRV) in landscape management. Forest Ecology and Management 258:1025–1037.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Kondolf G.M.,
    2. Mozingo L.A.,
    3. Kullmann K.,
    4. McBride J.R.,
    5. Anderson S.
    2013. Teaching stream restoration: Experiences from interdisciplinary studio instruction. Landscape Journal 32: 95–112.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Kowarik I.
    2011. Novel urban ecosystems, biodiversity, and conservation. Environmental Pollution 159:1974–1983.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. LaGro J.A.
    1999. Research capacity: a matter of semantics? Landscape Journal 18:179–186.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Lerman S.B.,
    2. Turner V.K.,
    3. Bang B.
    2012. Homeowner associations as a vehicle for promoting native urban biodiversity. Ecology and Society 17:45.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
    1. Lesica P.,
    2. Allendorf F.W.
    1997. Ecological genetics and the restoration of plant communities: Mix or match? Restoration Ecology 7:42–50.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
    1. Light A.
    2003. Urban ecological citizenship. Journal of Social Philosophy 34:44–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Lindenmayer D.B.,
    2. Fischer J.,
    3. Felton A.,
    4. Crane M.,
    5. Michael D.,
    6. Macgregor L.,
    7. Montague-Drake R.,
    8. Manning A.,
    9. Hobbs R.J.
    2008. Novel ecosystems resulting from landscape transformation create dilemmas for modern conservation practice. Conservation Letters 1:129–135.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Lovett I
    . 2013. Arid southwest cities’ plea: Lose the lawn. New York Times August 11. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/12/us/to-save-water-parched-southwest-cities-ask-homeowners-to-lose-their- lawns.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0.
    1. Lugo A.E.
    1992. Comparison of tropical tree plantations with secondary forests of similar age. Ecological Monographs 62:1–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Lugo A.E.
    2004. The outcome of alien tree invasions in Puerto Rico. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2:265–273.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Lugo A.E.,
    2. Carlo T.A.,
    3. Wunderle J.M. Jr.
    2012. Natural mixing of species: Novel plant-animal communities on Caribbean island. Animal Conservation 15:233–241.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Lurgi M.,
    2. Lopez B.C.,
    3. Montoya J.M.
    2012. Novel communities from climate change. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 367:2913–2922.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Madge P.
    1997. Ecological design: A new critique. Design Issues 13:44–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Marris E
    . 2011. Rambunctious Garden: Saving Nature in a Post-Wild World. New York, NY: Bloomsbury USA.
    1. Mascaro J.,
    2. Becklund K.K.,
    3. Hughes R.,
    4. Schnitzer S.A.
    2008. Limited native plant regeneration in novel, exotic-dominated forests on Hawai’i. Forest Ecology and Management 256:593–606.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Mascaro J.,
    2. Harris J.A.,
    3. Lach L.,
    4. Thompson A.,
    5. Perring M.P.,
    6. Richardson D.M.,
    7. Ellis E.C.
    2013. Origins of the novel ecosystems concept. Pages 45–57 in Hobbs R.J., Higgs E.S., Hall C.M. (eds), Novel Ecosystems: Intervening in the New Ecological World Order. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    1. Millar C.I.,
    2. Woolfenden W.B.
    1999. The role of climate change in interpreting historical variability. Ecological Applications 9: 1207–1216.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Millar C. I.,
    2. Brubaker L. B.
    2006. Climate change and paleoecology: new contexts for restoration ecology. Pages 315–340 in Falk D. A., Palmer M. A., Zedler J. B. (eds) Foundations of Restoration Ecology. Washington, DC: Island Press.
    1. Millar C.N.,
    2. Stephenson N.,
    3. Stephens S.L.
    2007. Climate change and the forests of the future: Managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecological Applications 17:2145–2151.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Milburn L-A. S.,
    2. Brown R.D.
    2003. The relationship between research and design in landscape architecture. Landscape and Urban Planning 64:47–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
    . 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
    1. Milton S.J.
    2003. ‘Emerging ecosystem’—a washing-stone for ecologists, economists, and sociologists? South African Journal of Science 99:404–406.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
    1. Nassauer J.I.
    2002. Ecological science and landscape design: A necessary relationship in changing landscapes. Pages 217–230 in Johnson B.R., Hill K.Z. (eds), Ecology and Design: Frameworks for Learning. Washington, DC: Island Press.
    1. Nielsen C,
    2. Heimes C.,
    3. Kollmann J.
    2008. Little evidence for negative effects of an invasive alien plant on pollinator services. Biological Invasions 10:1353–1363.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Overpeck J.T.,
    2. Bartlein P.J.,
    3. Webb T. III.
    1991. Potential magnitude of future vegetation change in eastern North America: Comparisons with the past. Science 254:692–695.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Park L. S-H.,
    2. Pellow D.N.
    2011. The Slums of Aspen: Immigrants vs. the Environment in America’s Eden. New York, NY: New York University Press.
    1. Parmesan C.
    2006. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annual Review of Ecological Systems 37:637–669.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Parry M.,
    2. Carter T.
    1998. Climate Impact and Adaptation Assessment. London, UK: Earthscan.
    1. Pastorok R.A.,
    2. MacDonald A.,
    3. Sampson J.R.,
    4. Wilbur P.,
    5. Yozzo D.J.,
    6. Titre J.P.
    1997. An ecological decision framework for environmental restoration projects. Ecological Engineering 9:89–107.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Pejchar L.,
    2. Mooney H.A.
    2009. Invasive species, ecosystem services and human well-being. Trends in Evology and Evolution 24:497–504.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Perkins H.A.,
    2. Heynen N.,
    3. Wilson J.
    2004. Inequitable access to urban reforestation: The impact of urban political economy on housing tenure and urban forests. Cities 21:291–299.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Peterson G.D.,
    2. Cumming G.S.,
    3. Carpenter S.
    2003. Scenario planning: a Tool for conservation in an uncertain world. Conservation Biology 17:358–366.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Pulliam H.R.,
    2. Johnson B.R.
    2002. Ecology’s new paradigm: What does it offer designers and planners? Pages 51–84 in Johnson B.R., Hill K.Z. (eds), Ecology and Design: Frameworks for Learning. Washington, DC: Island Press.
    1. Reckien D.,
    2. Eisenack K.
    2013. Climate change gaming on board and screen: A review. Simulation & Gaming 44:253–271.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Reynolds K.M.,
    2. Hessburg P.F.
    2005. Decision support for integrated landscape evaluation and restoration planning. Forest Ecology and Management 207:263–278.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Robbins P.,
    2. Sharp J.
    2003. Producing and consuming chemicals: The moral economy of the American lawn. Economic Geography 79:425–451.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
    1. Ruesink J.L.,
    2. Lenihan H.S.,
    3. Trimble A.C.,
    4. Heiman K.W.,
    5. Micheli F.,
    6. Byers J.E.,
    7. Kay M.C.
    2005. Introduction of non-native oysters: Ecosystem effects and restoration implications. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 36:643–689.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Sakai A.K,
    2. Allendorf F.W.,
    3. Holt J.S.,
    4. Lodge D.M.,
    5. Molofksy J.,
    6. With K.A.,
    7. Baughman S.,
    8. Cabin R.J.,
    9. Cohen J.E.,
    10. Ellstrand N.C.,
    11. McCauley D.E.,
    12. O’Neil P.,
    13. Parker I.M.,
    14. Thompson J.N.,
    15. Weller S.G.
    2001. The population biology of invasive species. Annual Review of Ecological Systematics 32:305–332.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Sax D.F.,
    2. Stachowicz J.J.,
    3. Brown J.H.,
    4. Bruno J.F.,
    5. Dawson M.N.,
    6. Gaines S.D.,
    7. Grosberg R.K.,
    8. Hastings A.,
    9. Holt R.D.,
    10. Mayfield M.M.,
    11. O’Connor M.I.,
    12. Rice W.R.
    2007. Ecological and evolutionary insights from species invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22:465–471.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Schakely S.,
    2. Deanwood R.
    2003. Constructing social futures for climate-change impacts and response studies: Building qualitative and quantitative scenarios with the participation of stakeholders. Climate Change Research 24:71–90.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
    1. Schlaepfer M.A.,
    2. Sax D.F.,
    3. Olden J.D.
    2011. The potential conservation value of non-native species. Conservation Biology 25:428–437.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Seastedt T.R.,
    2. Hobbs R.J.,
    3. Suding K.N.
    2008. Management of novel ecosystems: Are novel approaches required? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6:547–553.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Selman P.
    1998. Landscape design as research: an emerging debate. Landscape Research 23: 195–196.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Shearer A.W.
    2005. Approaching scenario-based studies: Three perceptions about the future and considerations for landscape planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 32:67–87.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Simenstad C.,
    2. Reed D.,
    3. Ford M.
    2006. When is restoration not: Incorporating landscape scale processes to restore self-sustaining ecosystems in coastal wetland restoration. Ecological Engineering 26:27–29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Slobodkin L.B.
    2001. The good, the bad, and the reified. Evolutionary Ecology Research 3:1–3.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
    1. Steiner F.,
    2. Simmons M.,
    3. Gallagher M.,
    4. Ranganathan J.,
    5. Robertson C.
    2013. The ecological imperative for environmental design and planning. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11:355–361.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Stromberg J.,
    2. Chew M.K.,
    3. Nagler P.,
    4. Glenn E.P.
    2009. Changing perceptions of change: The role of scientists in Tamarix and river management. Restoration Ecology 17:177–186.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Suding K.N.,
    2. Leger E.
    2012. Shifting baselines: Dynamics of evolution and community change in a changing world. Pages 281–292 in van Andel J., Aronson J.(eds), Restoration Ecology: The New Frontier. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
    1. Thering S.,
    2. Chanse V.
    2011. The scholarship of transdisciplinary action research: Toward a new paradigm for the planning and design professions. Landscape Journal 30:1–11.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. The United States Environmental Protection Agency
    . 2004. Landscaping with Native Plants: Quantification of the Benefits of Native Landscaping Current Knowledge. http://www.epa.gov/greatlakes/greenacres/conf12_04/conf_knwldge.html.
    1. Thompson A,
    2. Jackson S.T.
    2013. The human influence: Moral responsibility for novel ecosystems. Pages 125–150 in Basl J., Sandler R.L. (eds), Designer Biology: The Ethics of Intensively Engineering Biological and Ecological Systems. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
    1. Tockner K.,
    2. Pusch M.,
    3. Gessner J.,
    4. Wolter C.
    2011. Domesticated ecosystems and novel communities: Challenges for the management of large rivers. Ecohydrology and Hydrobiology 11:167–174.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Tress B.,
    2. Tress G.,
    3. Decamps H.,
    4. d’Hauteserre A-M
    . 2001. Bridging human and natural sciences in landscape research. Landscape and Urban Planning 57:137–141.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Tschakert P.,
    2. Dietrich K.A.
    2010. Anticipatory learning for climate change adaptation and resilience. Ecology and Society 15:11.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
    1. United States National Park Service and the Soil Conservation Service
    . 2000. Native plants for parks: Cost-effective programs for resource management, revegetation with native plants, threatened or endangered species, historical plants. A cooperative program between the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, and Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Washington, D.C.: National Park Service, Soil Conservation Service.
    1. Van der Ryn S,
    2. Cowan S.
    1996. Ecological Design. Washington, DC: Island Press.
    1. Vergragt P.J.,
    2. Quist J.
    2011. Backcasting for sustainability: Introduction to the special issue. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78:747–755.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Vila M.,
    2. Basnou C.,
    3. Pysek P.,
    4. Josefsson M.,
    5. Genovesi P.,
    6. Gollasch S.,
    7. Nentwig W.,
    8. Olenin S.,
    9. Roques A.,
    10. Roy D.,
    11. Hulme P.,
    12. DAISE Partners.
    2010. How well do we understand the impacts of alien species on ecosystem services? A pan-European, cross-taxa assessment. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 8:155–144.
    OpenUrl
    1. Walther G-R.,
    2. Roques A.,
    3. Hulme P.E.,
    4. Sykesm M.T.,
    5. Pysek P.,
    6. Kuhn I.,
    7. Zobel M.,
    8. Bacher S.,
    9. Botta-Dukat Z.,
    10. Bugmann H.,
    11. Czucz B.,
    12. Dauber J.,
    13. Hickler T.,
    14. Jarosik V.,
    15. Kenis M.,
    16. Klotz S.,
    17. Minchin D.,
    18. Moora M.,
    19. Nentwig W.,
    20. Ott J.,
    21. Panov V.E.,
    22. Reineking B.,
    23. Robinet C.,
    24. Semenchenko V.,
    25. Solarz W.,
    26. Thuiller W.,
    27. Vila M.,
    28. Vohland K.,
    29. Settele J.
    2009. Alien species in a warmer world: Risks and opportunities. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24:686–693.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. White P.S.,
    2. Walker J.
    1997. Approximating nature’s variation: selecting and using reference information in restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 5:338–49.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Wiens J.A.,
    2. Seavy N.E.,
    3. Jongsomjit D.
    2011. Protected areas in climate space: What will the future bring? Biological Conservation 144:2119–2125.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Williams J.W.,
    2. Jackson S.T.
    2007. Novel climates, no-analog communities, and ecological surprises. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5:475–482.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Wolch J.R.,
    2. Byrne J.,
    3. Newell J.P.
    2014. Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough.’ Landscape and Urban Planning 125:234–244.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Woodall C.W.,
    2. Nowak D.J.,
    3. Liknes G.C.,
    4. Westfall J.A.
    2010. Assessing the potential for urban trees to facilitate forest tree migration in the eastern United States. Forest Ecology and Management 259:1447–1454.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Zachos J.,
    2. Pagani M.,
    3. Sloan L.,
    4. Thomas E.,
    5. Billups K.
    2001. Trends, rhythms, and aberrations in global climate 65 Ma to present. Science 292:686–693.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Zeunert J.
    2013. Challenging assumptions in urban restoration ecology. Landscape Journal 32: 231–241.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Zube E.H.
    1980. Environmental Evaluation: Perception and Public Policy. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ecological Restoration: 33 (1)
Ecological Restoration
Vol. 33, Issue 1
1 Mar 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ecological Restoration.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Novel Landscapes: Challenges and Opportunities for Educating Future Ecological Designers and Restoration Practitioners
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ecological Restoration
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ecological Restoration web site.
Citation Tools
Novel Landscapes: Challenges and Opportunities for Educating Future Ecological Designers and Restoration Practitioners
Sarah E. Dooling
Ecological Restoration Mar 2015, 33 (1) 96-110; DOI: 10.3368/er.33.1.96

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Novel Landscapes: Challenges and Opportunities for Educating Future Ecological Designers and Restoration Practitioners
Sarah E. Dooling
Ecological Restoration Mar 2015, 33 (1) 96-110; DOI: 10.3368/er.33.1.96
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Restoring Degraded Objects: The Next Best Thing to Teaching Ecological Restoration in the Field
  • North Carolina University System Developing Program in Restoration
Show more Education

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • landscape architecture and design
  • novel ecosystems
  • pedagogical strategies
UW Press logo

© 2025 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire