Inter- and Intraspecific Variation in Native Restoration Plants for Herbicide Tolerance

References

1. 1. Allen E.B.,
   2. Knight D.H.

   1984. The effects of introduced annuals on secondary succession in sagebrush-grassland, Wyoming. The Southwestern Naturalist 29:407–421.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. 1. Baker W.L.,
   2. Garner J.,
   3. Lyon P.

   2009. Effects of imazapic on cheatgrass and native plants in Wyoming big sagebrush restoration for Gunnison sage grouse. Natural Areas Journal 29:204–209.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Bates D.,
   2. Maechler M.,
   3. Bolker B.,
   4. Walker S.

   2014. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. ArXiv e-print; submitted to Journal of Statistical Software. arxiv.org/abs/1406.5823.
4. 1. Bottoms R.M.,
   2. Whitson T.D.

   1998. A systems approach for the management of Russian knapweed (Centaurea repens). Weed Technology 12:363–366.

   OpenUrlWeb of Science
5. 1. Brain P.,
   2. Cousens R.

   1989. An equation to describe dose responses where there is stimulation of growth at low doses. Weed Research 29:93–96.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. 1. Conklin K.L.,
   2. Lym R.G.

   2013. Effect of temperature and moisture on aminocyclopyrachlor soil half-life. Weed Technology 27:552–556.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. 1. D’Antonio C.M.,
   2. Meyerson L.A.

   2002. Exotic plant species as problems and solutions in ecological restoration: A synthesis. Restoration Ecology 10:703–713.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 2010. Registration of the new active ingredient aminocyclopyrachlor for use on non-crop areas, sod farms, turf and residential lawns. Available at www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0789-0014. Accessed: August 3, 2014.
9. 1. Jones T.A.

   2013. Ecologically appropriate plant materials for restoration applications. Bioscience 63:211–219.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
10. 1. Kniss A.R.,
    2. Lyon D.J.

    2011. Winter wheat response to preplant applications of aminocyclopyrachlor. Weed Technology 25:51–57.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. 1. Kyser G.B.,
    2. Hazebrook A.,
    3. DiTomaso J.M.

    2013. Integration of prescribed burning, aminopyralid, and reseeding for restoration of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis)-infested rangeland. Invasive Plant Science and Management 6:480–491.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. 1. Leger E.A.

    2008. The adaptive value of remnant native plants in invaded communities: An example from the Great Basin. Ecological Applications 18:1226–1235.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 1. Leger E.A.,
    2. Espeland E.K.

    2010. PERSPECTIVE: Coevolution between native and invasive plant competitors: Implications for invasive species management. Evolutionary Applications 3:169–178.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 1. Lesica P.,
    2. Allendorf F.W.

    1999. Ecological genetics and the restoration of plant communities: Mix or match? Restoration Ecology 7:42–50.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. 1. Lesica P.,
    2. Atthowe H.E.

    2007. Identifying weed-resistant bluebunch wheatgrass for restoration in Western Montana. Ecological Restoration 25:191–198.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
16. 1. Mealor B.A.,
    2. Hild A.L.

    2006. Potential selection in native grasses by exotic invasion. Molecular Ecology 15:2291–3000.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 1. Mealor B.A.,
    2. Hild A.L.

    2007. Post-invasion evolution of native plant populations: a test of biological resilience. Oikos 116: 1493–1500.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. 1. Mikkelson J.R.,
    2. Lym R.G.

    2013. Effect of aminopyralid on desirable forb species. Invasive Plant Science and Management 6:30–35.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. 1. Morris C.,
    2. Monaco T.A.,
    3. Rigby C.W.

    2009. Variable impacts of imazapic rate on downy brome (Bromus tectorum) and seeded species in two rangeland communities. Invasive Plant Science and Management 2:110–119.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. 1. R Development Core Team

    . 2008. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. IBN 3-90051-07-0. www.R-project.org.
21. 1. Ritz C.,
    2. Streibig J.C.

    2005. Bioassay Analysis using R. Journal of Statistical Software. 12(5). www.jstatsoft.org/v12/i05/paper.
22. 1. Roach D.R.,
    2. Wulff R.D.

    1987. Maternal effects in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18:209–235.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. 1. Sbatella G.,
    2. Wilson R.,
    3. Winslow S.,
    4. Hicks C.

    2011. Propoxycarbazone- sodium and imazapic effects on downy brome (Bromus tectorum) and newly seeded perennial grasses. Invasive Plant Science and Management 4:78–86.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. 1. Seefeldt S.S.,
    2. Jensen J.E.,
    3. Fuerst E.P.

    1995. Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose response relationships. Weed Technology 9:218–227.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
25. United States Department of Agriculture—Forest Service (USDAFS). 2012. Native Plant Materials Policy: A Strategic Framework. FS-1006. Washington, D.C
26. United States Department of Interior—Bureau of Land Management (USDI-BLM). 2008. Integrated Vegetation Management Handbook. H-1740-02. Washington, D.C.
27. 1. Whitson T.D.,
    2. Koch D.W.

    1998. Control of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) with herbicides and perennial grass competition. Weed Technology 12:391–396.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
28. 1. Wilson M.V.,
    2. Ingersoll C.A.,
    3. Wilson M.G.,
    4. Clark D.L.

    2004. Why pest plant control and native plant establishment failed: A restoration autopsy. Natural Areas Journal 24:23–31.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
29. 1. Wilson R.G.,
    2. Kachman S.D.

    1999. Effect of perennial grasses on Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) control. Weed Technology 13:83–87.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science