Habitat Conditions of Montane Meadows associated with Restored and Unrestored Stream Channels of California

References

1. ACOE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual, Technical Report Y-87-1. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS. NTIS No. AD A176 912.
2. ACOE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region. Version 2.0. ERDC/ EL TR-10-3. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
3. 1. Adams M.J.

   2000. Pond permanence and the effects of exotic vertebrates on anurans. Ecological Applications 10:559–568.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. 1. Allen-Diaz B.

   1991. Water-table and plant species relationships in Sierra Nevada meadows. American Midland Naturalist 126: 30–43.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. 1. Anderson D.R.

   2008. Model-Based Inference in the Life Sciences: A Primer on Evidence. New York, NY: Springer.
6. 1. Badiou P.,
   2. McDougal R.,
   3. Pennock D.,
   4. Clark B.

   2011. Greenhouse gas emissions and carbon sequestration potential in restored wetlands of the Canadian prairie pothole region. Wetlands Ecology and Management 19:237–256.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. 1. Balcombe C.K.,
   2. Anderson J.T,
   3. Fortney R.H.,
   4. Rentch J.S.,
   5. Grafton W.N.,
   6. Kordek W.S.

   2005. A comparison of plant communities in mitigation and reference wetlands in the mid-Appalachians. Wetlands 25:130–142.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
8. 1. Beechie T.J.,
   2. Sear D.A,
   3. Olden J.D.,
   4. Pess G.R.,
   5. Buffington J.M.,
   6. Moir H.,
   7. Roni P.,
   8. Pollock M.M.

   2010. Process-based principles for restoring river ecosystems. BioScience 60:209–222.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
9. 1. Benoit T,
   2. Wilcox J.

   1997. Applying a fluvial geomorphic classification system to watershed restoration. Stream Notes. US Forest Service. feather-river-crm.org/pdf/Streamnts.pdf.
10. 1. Bernhardt E.S.,
    2. Palmer M.A.

    2011. River restoration: The fuzzy logic of repairing reaches to reverse catchment scale degradation. Ecological Applications 21:1926–1931.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 1. Bernhardt E.S.,
    2. Palmer M.A.,
    3. Allan J.D,
    4. Alexander G.,
    5. Barnas K.,
    6. Brooks S.,
    7. Carr J.,
    8. Clayton S.,
    9. Dahm C.,
    10. Follstad-Shah J.,
    11. Galat D.,
    12. Gloss S.,
    13. Goodwin P.,
    14. Hart D.,
    15. Hassett B.,
    16. Jenkinson R.,
    17. Katz S.,
    18. Kondolf G.M.,
    19. Lake P.S.,
    20. Lave R.,
    21. Meyer J.L.,
    22. O’Donnell T.K.,
    23. Pagano L.,
    24. Powell B.,
    25. Sudduth E.

    2005. Synthesizing US river restoration efforts. Science 308:636–637.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
12. 1. Bisutti I.,
    2. Hilke I.,
    3. Raessler M.

    2004. Determination of total organic carbon—An overview of current methods. Trends in Analytical Chemistry 23:10–11.

    OpenUrl
13. 1. Blank R.R.,
    2. Svejcar T.,
    3. Riegel T.

    2006. Soil attributes in a Sierra Nevada riparian meadow as influenced by grazing. Range Ecology and Management 59:321–329.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. 1. Booth E.G.,
    2. Loheide S.P II.

    2012. Comparing surface effective saturation and depth-to-water-level as predictors of plant composition in a restored riparian wetland. Ecohydrology 5:637–647.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. 1. Burnham K.P.,
    2. Anderson D.R.

    2002. Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach New York, NY: Springer Verlag.
16. 1. Cornwell K,
    2. Brown K.

    2008. Physical and hydrological characterization of Clark’s Meadow in the Last Chance Watershed of Plumas County: Report to the Natural Heritage Institute, Mountain Meadows IRWMP. Sacramento, CA: California State University Sacramento, Department of Geology.
17. 1. Crawford L.,
    2. Yeomans W.E.,
    3. Adams C.E.

    2006. The impact of introduced signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus on stream invertebrate communities. Aquatic Conservation 16:611–621.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. 1. Flenniken M.,
    2. McEldowney R.R.,
    3. Leininger W.C.,
    4. Frasier G.W.,
    5. Trlica M.J.

    2001. Hydrologic responses of a montane riparian ecosystem following cattle use. Journal of Range Management 54:567–574.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. 1. Fuller T.E.,
    2. Pope K.L.,
    3. Ashton D.,
    4. Welsh H.H.

    2011. Linking the distribution of an invasive amphibian (Rana catesbeiana) to habitat conditions in a managed river system in northern California. Restoration Ecology 19:204–213.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. 1. Germanoski D,
    2. Miller J.R.

    2004. Basin sensitivity to channel incision in response to natural and anthropogenic disturbance. Pages 88–123 in Chambers J.C., Miller J.R. (eds), Great Basin Riparian Ecosystems—Ecology Management and Restoration. Covelo, CA: Island Press.
21. 1. Hammersmark C.T.,
    2. Dobrowski S.Z.,
    3. Rains M.C.,
    4. Mount J.F.

    2010. Simulated effects of stream restoration on the distribution of wet-meadow vegetation. Restoration Ecology 18:882–893.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. 1. Hammersmark C.T.,
    2. Rains M.C.,
    3. Mount J.F.

    2008. Quantifying the hydrological effects of stream restoration in a montane meadow, northern California, USA. River Research and Applications 24:735–753.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. 1. Johnson P.T.,
    2. Olden J.D.,
    3. Vander Zanden M.J.

    2008. Dam invaders: Impoundments facilitate biological invasions into freshwaters. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6:357–363.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
24. 1. Kattelmann R

    . 1996. Hydrology and water resources. Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final report to Congress, Vol. II, Assessments and scientific basis for management options. Wildland Resources Center Report no. 39. Davis, CA: University of California, Davis.
25. 1. Kayranli B.,
    2. Scholz M.,
    3. Mustafa A.,
    4. Hedmark A.

    2010. Carbon storage and fluxes within freshwater wetlands: A critical review. Wetlands 30:111–124.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
26. 1. Kondolf M.K.

    1997. Hungry Water: Effects of dams and gravel mining on river channels. Environmental Management 4:533–551.

    OpenUrl
27. 1. Liang L.,
    2. Kavvas M.L.,
    3. Chen Z.Q.,
    4. Anderson M.,
    5. Ohara N.,
    6. Wilcox J.,
    7. Mink L.

    2007. Modeling river restoration impact on flow and sediment in a California watershed. Pages 1–10, Proceedings of the World Environmental and Water Resources Congress.
28. 1. Loheide S.P.,
    2. Deitchman R.S.,
    3. Cooper D.J.,
    4. Wolf E.C.,
    5. Hammersmark C.T.,
    6. Lundquist J.D.

    2009. Hydroecology of impacted wet meadows in the Sierra Nevada and Cascade Ranges, CA. Hydrogeology Journal 17:229–246.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
29. 1. Loheide S.P.,
    2. Gorelick S.M.

    2007. Riparian hydroecology: A coupled model of the observed interactions between groundwater flow and meadow vegetation patterning. Water Resources Research 43:W07414 doi:10.1029/2006WR005233.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
30. 1. Lowry C.S.,
    2. Loheide S.P. II.,
    3. Moore C.E.,
    4. Lundquist J.D.

    2011. Groundwater controls on vegetation composition and patterning in mountain meadows. Water Resources Research 47:W00J11. doi:10.1029/2010WR010086.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
31. 1. Lukacs P.M.,
    2. Burnham K.P.,
    3. Anderson D.R.

    2010. Model selection bias and Freedman’s paradox. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 62:117–125.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. 1. Menke J.W.,
    2. Davis C.,
    3. Beesley P.

    1996. Rangeland assessment. Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final Report to Congress, Vol. III. Davis, CA: University of California, Davis, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources.
33. 1. Miller J.R.,
    2. Lord M.L.,
    3. Germanoski D.

    2011. Meadow sensitivity to natural and anthropogenic disturbance. Pages 68–84in Chambers J.C., Miller J.R. (eds), Geomorphology, Hydrology, and Ecology of Great Basin Meadow Complexes: Implications for Management and Restoration. United States Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-258.
34. 1. Moreno-Mateos D.,
    2. Power M.E.,
    3. Comin F.A.,
    4. Yockteng R.

    2012. Structural and functional loss in restored ecosystems. PLOS Biology 10:e1001247.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
35. NFWF (National Fish and Wildlife Foundation). 2010. Business plan for the Sierra Nevada meadow restoration. www.nfwf.org/sierranevada/Documents/Sierra_Meadow_Restoration_business_plan.pdf.
36. 1. Nie Y.,
    2. Li A.

    2011. Assessment of alpine wetland dynamics from 1976–2006 in the vicinity of Mount Everest. Wetlands 31:875–884.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
37. 1. Norton J.B.,
    2. Jungst L.J.,
    3. Norton U.,
    4. Olsen H.R.,
    5. Tate K.W.,
    6. Horwath W.R.

    2011. Soil carbon and nitrogen storage in upper montane riparian meadows. Ecosystems 14:1217–1231.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
38. 1. Burt R

    . (ed). 2004. Soil Survey Laboratory Methods Manual, Version 4.0. Natural Resources Conservation Service. www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/home/?cid=nrcs142p2_054247.
39. 1. Burt R

    . (ed). 2011. Soil survey investigations report No. 45, Version 2.0. Natural Resources Conservation Service.
40. 1. Vasilas L.M.,
    2. Hurt G.W.,
    3. Noble C.V.

    (eds). 2010. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States, Version 7.0. Natural Resources Conservation Service in cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils.
41. 1. O’Neill K.P.,
    2. Amacher M.C.,
    3. Perry C.H.

    2005. Soils as an indicator of forest health: A guide to the collection, analysis, and interpretation of soil indicator data in the Forest Inventory and Analysis Program. United States Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-258.
42. 1. Palmer M.A.

    2009. Reforming watershed restoration: Science in need of application and applications in need of science. Estuaries and Coasts 32:1–17.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
43. 1. Palmer M.A.,
    2. Bernhardt E.S.

    2006. Hydroecology and river restoration: Ripe for research and synthesis. Water Resources Research 42:W03S07.

    OpenUrl
44. 1. Pan X.,
    2. Wang B.

    2009. Time for China to restore its natural wetlands. Nature 459:321.

    OpenUrlPubMed
45. 1. Peterson B.J.,
    2. Wollheim W.,
    3. Mulholland P.J.,
    4. Webster J.R.,
    5. Meyer J.L.,
    6. Tank J.L.,
    7. Martí E.,
    8. Bowden W.B.,
    9. Valett H.M.,
    10. Hershey A.E.,
    11. McDowell W.H.,
    12. Dodds W.K.,
    13. Hamilton S.K.,
    14. Gregory S.V.,
    15. Morrall D.D.

    2001. Control of nitrogen export from watersheds by headwater streams. Science 292:86–90.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
46. 1. Pilkey O.H.,
    2. Pilkey-Jarvis L.

    2007. Useless Arithmetic: Why Environmental Scientists Can’t Predict the Future. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
47. 1. Purdy S.E.,
    2. Moyle P.B.,
    3. Tate K.W.

    2012. Montane meadows in the Sierra Nevada: Comparing terrestrial and aquatic assessment methods. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 184: 6967–6986.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
48. 1. Rey Benayas J.M.,
    2. Newton A.C.,
    3. Diaz A.,
    4. Bullock J.M.

    2009. Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: A meta-analysis. Science 325:1121–1124.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
49. 1. Roath L.R.,
    2. Krueger W.C.

    1982. Cattle grazing influence on a mountain riparian zone. Journal of Range Management 35: 100–103.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
50. 1. Schlesinger W.H.,
    2. Reynolds J.F.,
    3. Cunningham G.L.,
    4. Huenneke L.F.,
    5. Jarrell W.M.,
    6. Virginia R.A.,
    7. Whitford W.G.

    1990. Biological feedbacks in global desertification. Science 247:1043–1048.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
51. 1. Simberloff D.

    2003. How much information on population biology is needed to manage introduced species? Conservation Biology 17:83–92.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
52. 1. Strayer D.L.

    2010. Alien species in fresh waters: Ecological effects, interactions with other stressors, and prospects for the future. Freshwater Biology 55:152–174.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
53. 1. Trowbridge W.,
    2. Chambers J.C.,
    3. Germanoski D.,
    4. Lord M.L.,
    5. Miller J.R.,
    6. Jewett D.G.

    2011. Characterization of meadow ecosystems based on watershed and valley segment/reach scale characteristics. Pages 95–112 in Chambers J.C., Miller J.R. (eds) in Geomorphology, Hydrology, and Ecology of Great Basin Meadow Complexes: Implications for Management and Restoration. United States Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-258. USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 1988. National list of vascular plant species that occur in wetlands. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 88 (26.9).
54. USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 1993. 1993 Supplement to list of plant species that occur in wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). Supplement to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 88 (26.9).
55. 1. VanAmburg L.,
    2. Booth D.T.,
    3. Weltz M.A.,
    4. Trlica M.J.

    2005. Technical note: A laser point frame to measure cover. Rangeland Ecology and Management 58:557–560.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
56. 1. Viers J.H.,
    2. Purdy S.E.,
    3. Peek R.A.,
    4. Fryjoff-Hung A.,
    5. Santos N.R.,
    6. Katz J.V.E.,
    7. Emmons J.D.,
    8. Dolan D.V.,
    9. Yarnell S.M.

    2013. Montane meadows in the Sierra Nevada: Changing hydroclimatic conditions and concepts for vulnerability assessment. Center for Watershed Sciences Technical Report (CWS-2013-01), University of California, Davis.
57. 1. Weixelman D.A.,
    2. Hill B.A.,
    3. Cooper D.J.,
    4. Berlow E.L.,
    5. Viers J.H.,
    6. Purdy S.E.,
    7. Merrill A.G.,
    8. Gross S.E.

    2011. A field key to meadow hydrogeomorphic types for the Sierra Nevada and southern Cascade ranges in California. United States Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region Gen. Tech. Rep. R5-TP-034, Vallejo, California.
58. 1. Wolf K.L.,
    2. Changwoo A.,
    3. Noe G.B.

    2011. Development of soil properties and nitrogen cycling in created wetlands. Wetlands 31:699–712.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
59. 1. Wood S.H.

    1975. Holocene stratigraphy and chronology of mountain meadows, Sierra Nevada, CA. PhD dissertation, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA.