Decisions . . . Decisions . . . How to Source Plant Material for Native Plant Restoration Projects

References

1. 1. Breed M.F.,
   2. Stead M.G.,
   3. Ottewell K.M.,
   4. Gardner M.G.,
   5. Lowe A.J.

   2013. Which provenance and where? Seed sourcing strategies for revegetation in a changing environment. Conservation Genetics 14:1–10.

   OpenUrl
2. 1. Broadhurst L.M.,
   2. Lowe A.,
   3. Coates D.J.,
   4. Cunningham S.A.,
   5. McDonald M.,
   6. Vesk P.A.,
   7. Yates C.

   2008. Seed supply for broadscale restoration: maximizing evolutionary potential. Evolutionary Applications 1:587–597.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
3. 1. Fant J.B.,
   2. Holmstrom R.M.,
   3. Sirkin E.,
   4. Etterson J.R.,
   5. Masi S.

   2008. Genetic structure of threatened native populations and propagules used for restoration in a clonal species, American beachgrass (Ammophila breviligulata fern.). Restoration Ecology 16:594–603.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. 1. Galloway L.F.,
   2. Fenster C.B.

   2000. Population differentiation in an annual legume: Local adaptation. Evolution 54:1173–1181.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 1. Gibson D.J.,
   2. Baer S.G.,
   3. Klopf R.P.,
   4. Reed L.K.,
   5. Wodika B.R.,
   6. Wiland J.E.

   2013. Limited effects of dominant species population source on community composition during community assembly. Journal of Vegetation Science 24:429–440.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. 1. Golay M.G.,
   2. Manatt R.,
   3. Mabry C.,
   4. Thompson J.,
   5. Kolka R.

   2013. Restoration of herbaceous woodland plants: Persistence, growth, and reproductive success of local and non-local propagules. Ecological Restoration 31:378–387.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
7. 1. Hufford K.M.,
   2. Mazer S.J.

   2003. Plant ecotypes: Genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:147–155

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. 1. Hufford K.M.,
   2. Krauss S.L.,
   3. Veneklaas E.J.

   2012. Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in Stylidium hispidum: Implications for mixing seed sources for ecological restoration. Ecology and Evolution 2:2262–2273.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
9. 1. Keller M.,
   2. Kollman J.,
   3. Edwards P.J.

   2000. Genetic introgression from distant provenances reduces fitness in local weed populations. Journal of Applied Ecology 37:647–659.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. 1. Linhart Y.B.,
    2. Grant M.C.

    1996. Evolutionary significance of local genetic differentiation in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27:237–277.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. 1. Pickup M.,
    2. Field D.L.,
    3. Rowell D.M.,
    4. Young A.G.

    2012. Source population characteristics affect heterosis following genetic rescue of fragmented plant populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society 280:1–9.

    OpenUrl
12. 1. Potter K.M.,
    2. Hargrove W.W.

    2012. Determining suitable locations for seed transfer under climate change: A global quantitative method. New Forests 43:581–599.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. 1. Saari C.,
    2. Glisson W.

    2012. Survey of Chicago Region restoration seed source policies. Ecological Restoration 30:162–165.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
14. 1. Waser N.M.,
    2. Price M.V.

    1985. Reciprocal transplant experiments with Delphinium nelsonii (Ranunculaceae): Evidence for local adaptation. American Journal of Botany 72:1726–1732.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science