Wolf Reintroduction: Ecological Management and the Substitution Problem

References

1. 1. Baker V

   . 2009. Wolf reintroduction: It won’t work here like in Yellowstone. Denver Post.February 15 2009. www.denverpost.com/search/ci_11694919.
2. 1. Baker W.L.,
   2. Munroe J.A.,
   3. Hessl A.E.

   1997. The effects of elk on aspen in the winter range in Rocky Mountain National Park. Ecography 20(2):155–165.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Berger K.M.,
   2. Gese E.M.,
   3. Berger J.

   2008. Indirect effects and traditional trophic cascades: A test involving wolves, coyotes, and pronghorn. Ecology 89(3):818–828.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 1. Borges J.L.

   2002. Of exactitude in science. Quaderns-Barcelona-Collegi D Arquitectes de Catalunya:12–12.
5. 1. Braithwaite R.B.

   1946. Teleological explanation: The presidential address. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 47:i–xx.

   OpenUrl
6. 1. Brennan A.

   1984. The moral standing of natural objects. Environmental Ethics 6(1):35–56.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
7. 1. Brown J.S.,
   2. Laundré J.W.,
   3. Gurung M.

   1999. The ecology of fear: Optimal foraging, game theory, and trophic interactions. Journal of Mammalogy 80(2):385–399.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
8. 1. Callicott J.B.,
   2. Crowder L.B.,
   3. Mumford K.

   1999. Current normative concepts in conservation. Conservation Biology 13(1):22–35.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. 1. Callicott J.B.,
   2. Mumford K.

   2002. Ecological sustainability as a conservation concept. Conservation Biology 11(1):32–40.

   OpenUrl
10. Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW). 2012. Gray Wolf. wildlife.state.co.us/WildlifeSpecies/SpeciesOfConcern/Mammals/Pages/GrayWolf.aspx.
11. 1. Edward R

    . 2009. A Vision for Wolves in the Southern Rocky Mountains. Wild Earth Guardians www.wildearthguardians.org/downloads/download_wolf-vision_low.pdf.
12. 1. Ehrenfeld J.G.

    2001. Defining the limits of restoration: The need for realistic goals. Restoration Ecology 8(1):2–9.

    OpenUrl
13. 1. Fix P.J.,
    2. Teel T.L.,
    3. Manfredo M.J.,
    4. Boston S.S.

    2010. Assessing public acceptance of wildlife management tradeoffs: A case study of elk and vegetation management in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 15:405–417.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
14. 1. Fujimura J.H.

    2011. Technobiological imaginaries: How do systems biologists know nature? Pages 65–80 in Goldman M.J., Nadasdy P., Turner M.D. (eds), Knowing Nature: Conversations at the Intersection of Political Ecology and Science Studies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
15. 1. Hale B.,
    2. Lee A.,
    3. Hermans A.

    2014. Clowning around with conservation: Adaptation, reparation, and the new substitution problem. Environmental Values 23(2):181–198.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. 1. Hettinger N.,
    2. Throop B.

    1999. Refocusing ecocentrism: De-emphasizing stability and defending wildness. Environmental Ethics 21:3–21.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
17. 1. Hilborn R,
    2. Mangel M.

    1997. The Ecological Detective: Confronting Models with Data (MPB-28). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18. 1. Katz E.

    1985. Organism, community, and the “Substitution Problem”. Environmental Ethics 7:241–256.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. 1. Katz E

    . 2000. Another look at restoration: technology and artificial nature. Pages 37–48 in Gobster P.H., Hull R.B. (eds), Restoring nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
20. 1. Laundré J.W.,
    2. Hernández L.,
    3. Altendorf K.B.

    2001. Wolves, elk, and bison: Reestablishing the “landscape of fear” in Yellowstone National Park, U.S.A. Canadian Journal of Zoology 79:1401–1409.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
21. 1. Licht D.S.,
    2. Millspaugh J.J.,
    3. Kunkel K.E.,
    4. Kochanny C.O.,
    5. Peterson R.O.

    2010. Using small populations of wolves for ecosystem restoration and stewardship. BioScience 60:147–153.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
22. 1. Mangel M.,
    2. Talbot L.M.,
    3. Meffe G.K.,
    4. et al.

    1996. Principles for the conservation of wild living resources. Ecological Applications 6:338–362.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. 1. McLaren B.E.,
    2. Peterson R.O.

    1994. Wolves, moose, and tree rings on Isle Royale. Science 266:1555–1558.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
24. 1. Mech D.L.

    2012. Is science in danger of sanctifying the wolf? Biological Conservation 150:143–149.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
25. 1. Middleton A.D.,
    2. Kauffman M.J.,
    3. McWhirter D.E.,
    4. Jimenez M.D.,
    5. Cook R.C.,
    6. Cook J.G.,
    7. Albeke S.E.,
    8. Sawyer H.,
    9. White P.J.

    2013. Linking anti-predator behaviour to prey demography reveals limited risk effects of an actively hunting large carnivore. Ecology Letters 16:1023–1030.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
26. 1. Monello R.J.,
    2. Powers J.G.,
    3. Hobbs N.T.,
    4. Spraker T.R.,
    5. Watry M.K.,
    6. Wild M.A.

    2014. Survival and population growth of a free-ranging elk population with a long history of exposure to chronic wasting disease. The Journal of Wildlife Management 78:214–223.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
27. 1. National Park Service

    . 2006. Management Policies: The Guide to Managing the National Park System. Washington, DC: National Park Service. www.nps.gov/tribes/Documents/NPSManagementPolicy.pdf.
28. 1. National Park Service

    . 2007. Rocky Mountain National Park: Elk and Vegetation Plan. Washington, DC: National Park Service. www.nps.gov/romo/parkmgmt/elkvegetation.htm.
29. 1. National Park Service

    . 2012a. Rocky Mountain National Park: History and Culture. Washington, DC: National Park Service. www.nps.gov/romo/historyculture/index.htm.
30. 1. National Park Service

    . 2012b. Revisting Leopold: Resource Stewardship in the National Parks. Washington DC: National Park System Advisory Board Committee.
31. 1. Pickett S.T.,
    2. Kolasa J.,
    3. Jones C.G.

    2007. Ecological Understanding: The Nature of Theory and the Theory of Nature, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Academic Press.
32. 1. Pielou E.

    1981. The usefulness of ecological models: A stocktaking. Quarterly Review of Biology 56:17–31.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
33. 1. Reading R.P.

    2009. Awakening Spirits: Wolves in the Southern Rockies. Golden, CO: Fulcrum Publishing.
34. 1. Ripple W.J.,
    2. Beschta R.L.

    2004. Wolves and the ecology of fear: Can predation risk structure ecosystems? BioScience 54:755–766.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
35. 1. Ripple W.J.,
    2. Beschta R.L.

    2006. Linking wolves to willows via risk-sensitive foraging by ungulates in the northern Yellowstone ecosystem. Forest Ecology and Management 230:96–106.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
36. 1. Sandom C.,
    2. Bull J.,
    3. Canney S.,
    4. Macdonald D.W.

    2012. Exploring the Value of Wolves (Canis lupus) in Landscape-Scale Fenced Reserves for Ecological Restoration in the Scottish Highlands. Pages 245–276 in Somers M.J., Hayward M. (eds), Fencing for Conservation. New York, NY: Springer.
37. 1. Seager S.T.,
    2. Eisenberg C.,
    3. St. Clair S.B.

    2013. Patterns and consequences of ungulate herbivory on aspen in western North America. Forest Ecology and Management 299:81–90.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
38. 1. Slack S.M.

    1994. The Implementation of the 1963 Leopold Report (Wildlife Management in the National Parks). Masters Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
39. 1. Smith D.W.,
    2. Peterson R.O.,
    3. Houston D.B.

    2003. Yellowstone after wolves. Bioscience 53:330–340.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
40. 1. Wilmers C.C.,
    2. Crabtree R.L.,
    3. Smith D.W.,
    4. Murphy K.M.,
    5. Getz W.M.

    2003. Trophic facilitation by introduced top predators: Grey wolf subsidies to scavengers in Yellowstone National Park. Journal of Animal Ecology 72:909–916.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
41. 1. Wright R.G.

    1999. Wildlife management in the national parks: questions in search of answers. Ecological Applications 9:30–36.

    OpenUrlCrossRef