Roots of Chaparral Shrubs Still Fail to Penetrate a GeoSynthetic Landfill Liner after 16 Years

References

1. 1. Callaway R.M.,
   2. Davis F.W.

   1993. Vegetation dynamics, fire, and the physical-environment in coastal central California. Ecology 74:1567–1578.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. 1. Calrecycle

   . 2009. A guide to the revegetation and environmental restoration of closed landfills. www.calrecycle.ca.gov/SWFacilities/Closure/Revegetate/.
3. 1. Dobson M.C.,
   2. Moffat A.J.

   1995. A re-evaluation of objections to tree planting on containment landfills. Waste Management and Research 13:579–600.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
4. 1. Forster A.

   1993. Landfill capping review. An assessment of current practices and performance within the United Kingdom, the rest of Europe and the United States. Department of the Environment Contract Report No. PECD 7/10/251. London: United Kingdom.
5. 1. Gillman E.F.

   1989. Tree root depth relative to landfill tolerance. HortScience 24:857.

   OpenUrl
6. 1. Griffin J.R.

   1978. Maritime chaparral and endemic shrubs of the Monterey Bay Region. Madrono 25:65–112.

   OpenUrl
7. 1. Handel S.N,
   2. Robinson G.R.,
   3. William F.J.,
   4. Mattei J.H.

   1997. Restoration of woody plants to capped landfills. Restoration Ecology 5:178–186.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. 1. Hellmers H.,
   2. Horton J.S.,
   3. Juhren G.,
   4. O’Keefe J.

   1955. Root systems of some chaparral plants in southern California. Ecology 36: 67–678.

   OpenUrl
9. 1. Holl K.D.

   2002. Roots of chaparral shrubs fail to penetrate a geosynthetic landfill liner. Ecological Restoration 20:111–115.

   OpenUrl
10. 1. Hutchings T.R.,
    2. Moffat A.J.,
    3. Kemp R.A.

    2001. Effects of rooting and tree growth of selected woodland species on cap integrity in a mineral capped landfill site. Waste Management & Research 19:194–200.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
11. 1. Kummerow J.,
    2. Krause D.,
    3. Jow W.

    1977. Root systems of chaparral shrubs. Oecologia 29:163–177.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. 1. Kummerow J.,
    2. Mangan R.

    1981. Root systems in Quercus dumosa Nutt. dominated chaparral in southern California. Acta Oecologica 2:177–188.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
13. 1. Moffat A. J.,
    2. Sinnett D.,
    3. Hutchings T.R.

    2008. Containment landfill sites–how to restore to beneficial land-use without compromising pollution control systems. Chemical Hazards and Poisons Report 13:37–39.

    OpenUrl
14. 1. Parsons W.F.J.,
    2. Ehrenfeld J.G.,
    3. Handel S.N.

    1998. Vertical growth and mycorrhizal infection of woody plant roots as potential limits to the restoration of woodlands on landfills. Restoration Ecology 6:280–289.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. 1. Robinson G.R.,
    2. Handel S.N.

    1995. Woody plant roots fail to penetrate a clay-lined landfill. Environmental Management 19:57–64.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
16. 1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)

    . 1989. Final covers on hazardous waste landfills and surface impoundments. Environmental Protection Agency Report EPA/530/SW-89/047. Washington, D.C.
17. 1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)

    . 2006. Revegetating landfills and waste containment areas fact sheet. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency Publication EPA 542-F-06-001.
18. 1. Vasey M.C.

    2012. Influence of the summer marine layer on maritime chaparral and implications for conservation policy in the California coastal zone. Ph.D. Dissertation: University of California, Santa Cruz.