The Rapid Riparian Revegetation Approach

References

1. 1. Anderson M,
   2. Graziano G.

   2002. Statewide Survey of Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board Riparian and Stream Enhancement Projects. Report sponsored by Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board and Northwest Service Academy.
2. 1. Arnott J.T.

   1975. Field performance of container grown and bareroot trees in coastal British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 5:186–194.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
3. 1. Beechie T.J.,
   2. Sear D.A.,
   3. Olden J.D.,
   4. Pess G.R.,
   5. Buffington J.M.,
   6. Moir H.,
   7. Roni P.,
   8. Pollock M.M.

   2010. Process-based principles for restoring river ecosystems. BioScience 60(3):209–222.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
4. 1. Bernhardt E.S.,
   2. Palmer M.A.,
   3. Allan J.D.,
   4. Alexander G.,
   5. Barnas K.,
   6. Brooks S.,
   7. Carr J.,
   8. Clayton S.,
   9. Dahm C.,
   10. Follstad-Shah J.,
   11. Galat D.,
   12. Gloss S.,
   13. Goodwin P.,
   14. Hart D.,
   15. Hassett B.,
   16. Jenkinson R.,
   17. Katz S.,
   18. Kondolf G.M.,
   19. Lake P.S.,
   20. Lave R.,
   21. Meyer J.L.,
   22. O'Donnell T.K.,
   23. Pagano L.,
   24. Powell B.,
   25. Sudduth E.

   2005. Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts. Science(308):636–637.
5. 1. Broadhurst L.M.,
   2. Lowe A.,
   3. Coates D.J.,
   4. Cunningham S.A.,
   5. McDonald M.,
   6. Vesk P.A.,
   7. Yates C.

   2008. Seed supply for broadscale restoration: Maximizing evolutionary potential. Evolutionary Applications 1(4):587–597.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
6. 1. Burbidge A.H.,
   2. Maron M.,
   3. Clarke M.F.,
   4. Baker J.,
   5. Oliver D.L.,
   6. Ford G.

   2011. Linking science and practice in ecological research and management: How can we do it better? Ecological Management & Restoration 12(1):54–60.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
7. 1. Burdett A.N.,
   2. Herring L.J.,
   3. Thompson C.F.

   1984. Early growth of planted spruce. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 14:644–651.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. 1. Butler S,
   2. Long J.

   2005. Economics and Survival of Hand-Planted Riparian Forest Buffers in West Central Maine. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service.
9. 1. Christy J.A.,
   2. Alverson E.R.

   2011. Historical vegetation of the Willamette Valley, Oregon, circa 1850. Northwest Science 85:93–107.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. Clean Water Services. 2005. Revised Temperature Management Plan February 28, 2005 www.deq.state.or.us/wq/wqpermit/docs/individual/npdes/ph1ms4/cws/tmp/plan.pdf.

    OpenUrl
11. 1. Downs P.W.,
    2. Kondolf G.M.

    2002. Post-project appraisals in adaptive management of river channel restoration. Environmental Management 29(4):477–496.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
12. 1. Fierke M.K.,
    2. Kauffman J.B.

    2006. Invasive sepecies influence riparian plant diversity along a successional gradient, Willamette River, Oregon. Natural Areas Journal 26:376–382.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. 1. Grossnickle S.C.

    2005. Importance of root growth in overcoming planting stress. New Forests 30:273–294.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. 1. Hiers J.K.,
    2. Mitchell R.J.,
    3. Barnett A.,
    4. Walters J.R.,
    5. Mack M.,
    6. Williams B.,
    7. Sutter R.

    2012. The dynamic reference concept: Measuring restoration success in a rapidly changing no-analogue future. Ecological Restoration 30:27–36.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
15. 1. Hobbs S.D.,
    2. Wearstler J.K.A.

    1983. Performance of three Douglas-fir stocktypes on a skeletal soil. Tree Planters’ Notes 34:ii-14.

    OpenUrl
16. 1. Hobbs S.D.

    1984. The influence of species and stocktype selection on stand establishment: An ecophysiological perspective. Pages 179–224 in Dureyea M.L., Brown G.N. (eds), Seedling Physiology and Reforestation Success. Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff W. Junk Publishers.
17. 1. Hobbs R.J.,
    2. Norton D.A.

    1996. Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 4(2):93–110.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. 1. Hobbs R.J.

    2006. Foreword. Pages ix–x in Falk D.A., Palmer M.A., Zedler J.B. (eds), Foundations of Restoration Ecology. Washington DC: Island Press.
19. 1. Hulse D.,
    2. Gregory S.,
    3. Baker J.

    2002. Willamette River Basin Planning Atlas: Trajectories of Environmental and Ecological Change. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.
20. 1. Kondolf G.M.

    1995.Five elements for effective evaluation of stream restoration. Restoration Ecology 3(2):133–136.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
21. 1. Lackey R.T.

    2000. Restoring wild salmon to the Pacific Northwest: Chasing an illusion? In: What We Don’t Know about Pacific Northwest Fish Runs—An Inquiry into Decision-Making. Patricia Koss, Katz Mike, Editodolrs, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, pp. 91–143.
22. 1. Landis T.D.,
    2. Dumroese R.K.,
    3. Haase D.L.

    2010. Seedling processing, storage, and outplanting, Vol. 7, The Container Tree Nursery Manual. Agricultural Handbook. 674. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC.
23. 1. Lave R.

    2009. The controversy over natural channel design: Substantive explanations and potential avenues for resolution. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 45(6):1519–1532.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. 1. Lave R.,
    2. Doyle M.,
    3. Robertson M.

    2010. Privatizing stream restoration in the US. Social Studies of Science 40(5):677–703.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
25. 1. Macarthur R,
    2. Wilson E.O.

    1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26. 1. Michie R

    . 2010. Cost Estimate to Restore Riparian Forest Buffers and Improve Stream Habitat in the Willamette Basin, Oregon. Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) Water Quality Division, Watershed Management Section, Salem, Oregon.
27. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). National Weather Service Forecast Office, Portland, OR, (Accessed November 11, 2013), www.wrh.noaa.gov/.
28. 1. Nilsson U.,
    2. Örlander G.

    1995. Effects of regeneration methods on drought damage to newly planted Norway spruce seedlings. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 25:790–802.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
29. 1. Oregon Department of State Lands (ODSL)

    . 2009. Interim Review Draft: Routine Monitoring Guidance for Vegetation Version 1.0. Oregon Division of State Lands.
30. 1. Palmer M.A.,
    2. Bernhardt E.S.,
    3. Allan J.D.,
    4. Lake P.S.,
    5. Alexander G.,
    6. Brooks S.,
    7. Carr J.,
    8. Clayton S.,
    9. Dahm C.N.,
    10. Follstad Shah J.,
    11. Galat D.L.,
    12. Loss S.G.,
    13. Goodwin P.,
    14. Hart D.D.,
    15. Hassett B.,
    16. Jenkinson R.,
    17. Kondolf G.M.,
    18. Lave R.,
    19. Meyer J.L.,
    20. O’donnell T.K.,
    21. Pagano L.,
    22. Sudduth E.

    2005. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:208–217.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
31. 1. Prodgers R.A.,
    2. Keck T.,
    3. Holzworth L.K.

    2000. Revegetation Evaluations—How Long Must We Wait? 2000 Billings Land Reclamation Symposium.
32. 1. Query T

    . 2001. Watershed Revegetation Program Reference Site Analysis, City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services.
33. 1. Reid K.A.,
    2. Williams K.J.H.,
    3. Paine M.S.

    2011. Hybrid knowledge: place, practice, and knowing in a volunteer ecological restoration project. Ecology and Society 16:19.

    OpenUrl
34. 1. Rose R.,
    2. Haase D.L.

    2005. Root and shoot allometry of bareroot and container Douglas-fir seedlings. New Forests 30:215–233.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
35. 1. Rose R.,
    2. Cambell S.J.,
    3. Landis T.D.

    (eds). 1990. Target Seedling Symposium: Proceedings, Combined Meeting of the Western Forest Nursery Associations; August 13–17, 1990; Roseburg, Oregon. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-200. Ft. Collins, CO: USDA, USFS, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
36. 1. Seavy N.E.,
    2. Gardali T.,
    3. Golet G.H.,
    4. Griggs F.T.,
    5. Howell C.A.,
    6. Kelsey R.,
    7. Small S.L.,
    8. Viers J.H.,
    9. Weigand J.F.

    2009. Why climate change makes riparian restoration more important than ever: Recommendations for practice and research. Ecological Restoration 27:330–338.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
37. 1. Smith C

    . 2012. 2012 Implementation and Effectiveness Monitoring Results for the Washington Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP): Plant and Buffer Performance. Washington State Conservation Commission.
38. 1. Sounhein R

    . 2003. Fourth and Fifth field Hucs (watersheds) within the State of Oregon. Salem, State of Oregon Division of State Lands.
39. 1. Stanturf J.A.,
    2. Conner W.H.,
    3. Gardiner E.S.,
    4. Schweitzer C.J.,
    5. Ezell A.W.

    2004. Practice and perspective: Recognizing and overcoming difficult site conditions for afforestation of bottomland hardwoods. Ecological Restoration 22:183–193.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
40. 1. Sudduth E.B.,
    2. Hassett B.A.,
    3. Cada P.,
    4. Bernhardt E.S.

    2011. Testing the field of dreams hypothesis: Functional responses to urbanization and restoration in stream ecosystems. Ecological Applications 21:1972–1988.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
41. 1. Suding K.N.,
    2. Gross K.L.,
    3. Houseman G.

    2004. Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19:46–53.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
42. 1. United States Geological Survey (USGS)

    . 2012. The National Hydrography Data Set. nhd.usgs.gov/data.html.
43. 1. Weigand J.F.,
    2. Haynes R.W.,
    3. Tiedemann A.R.,
    4. Riggs R.A.,
    5. Quigley T.M.

    1993. Economic assessment of ungulate herbivory in commercial forests of eastern Oregon and Washington, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 61:137–155.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
44. 1. Weisberg P.J.,
    2. Mortenson S.G.,
    3. Dilts T.E.

    2012. Gallery Forest or Herbaceous Wetland? The Need for Multi-Target Perspectives in Riparian Restoration Planning. Restoration Ecology 21(1):12–16.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
45. 1. Western Wildland Environmental Threat Assessment Center (WWETAC)

    . 2013. (Accessed 4 March 2013), www.fs.fed.us/wwetac/threat_map/SeedZones_Intro.html.
46. 1. Withrow-Robinson B.,
    2. Bennet M.,
    3. Ahrens G.

    2011.A Guide to Riparian Tree and Shrub Planting in the Willamette Valley: Steps to Success. Oregon State University Extension.
47. 1. Wyborn C.,
    2. Jellinek S.,
    3. Cooke B.

    2012. Negotiating multiple motivations in the science and practice of ecological restoration. Ecological Management & Restoration 13(3):249–253.

    OpenUrlCrossRef