A Realistic Role for Reference in Wetland Restoration

References

1. 1. Benayas J.M.R.,
   2. Netrom A.C.,
   3. Diaz A.,
   4. Bullock J.M.

   2009. Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: A meta-analysis. Science 325:1121–1124.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
2. 1. Brinson M.M.,
   2. Rheinhardt R.

   1996. The role of reference wetlands in functional assessment and mitigation. Ecological Applications 6:69–76.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Brooks R.P.,
   2. Wardrop D.H.,
   3. Cole C.A.,
   4. Campbell D.A.

   2005. Are we purveyors of wetland homogeneity? A model of degradation and restoration to improve wetland mitigation performance. Ecological Engineering 24:331–340.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. 1. Christensen V.

   1995. Ecosystem maturity: Towards quantification. Ecological Modeling 77:3–32.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
5. 1. Denslow J.S.

   1980. Patterns of plant species diversity during succession under different disturbance regimes. Oecologia 46:18–21.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. 1. Dodds W.K.,
   2. Wilson K.C.,
   3. Rehmier R.L.,
   4. Knight G.L.,
   5. Wiggam S.,
   6. Falke J.A.,
   7. Dalgleish H.J.,
   8. Bertrand K.N.

   2008. Comparing ecosystem goods and provided by restored and native lands. Bioscience 58:837–845.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
7. 1. Fagan K.C.,
   2. Powell R.F.,
   3. Bullock J.M.,
   4. Marrs R.H.

   2008. Do restored calcareous grasslands on former arable fields resemble ancient targets? The effect of time, methods, and environment on outcomes. Journal of Applied Ecology 45:1293–1303.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. 1. Findlay S.E.G.,
   2. Kiviat E.,
   3. Nieder W.C.,
   4. Blair E.A.

   2002. Functional assessment of a reference wetland set as a tool for science, management, and restoration. Aquatic Sciences 64:107–117.

   OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
9. 1. Hilderbrand R.H.,
   2. Watts A.C.,
   3. Randle A.M.

   2005. The myths of restoration ecology. Ecology and Society 10:19–29.

   OpenUrl
10. 1. Kentula M.E.,
    2. Sifneos J.C.,
    3. Good J.W.,
    4. Rylko M.,
    5. Kuntz K.

    1992. Trends and patterns in Section 404 permitting requiring compensatory mitigation in Oregon and Washington, USA. Environmental Management 16:109–119.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
11. 1. Leuschner C,
    2. Rode M.W.

    1999. The role of plant resources in forest succession: Changes in radiation, water and nutrient fluxes, and plant productivity over a 300-yr-long chronosequence in NW Germany. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 2:103–147.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. 1. Matthews J.W.,
    2. Spyreas G.

    2010. Convergence and divergence in plant community trajectories as a framework for monitoring wetland restoration progress. Journal of Applied Ecology 47:1128–1136.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. 1. Matthews J.W.,
    2. Spyreas G.,
    3. Endress A.G.

    2009. Trajectories of vegetation-based indicators used to assess wetland restoration progress. Ecological Applications 19:2093–2107.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 1. Miller J.R.,
    2. Hobbs R.J.

    2007. Habitat Restoration: Do we know what we’re doing? Restoration Ecology 15:382–390.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. 1. Mitsch W.J.,
    2. Gosselink J.G.

    2007. Wetlands. 4th Ed. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.
16. 1. Mitsch W.J.,
    2. Jørgensen S.E.

    2004. Ecological Engineering and Ecosystem Restoration. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.
17. 1. Moorhead K.K.,
    2. Rossell I.M.,
    3. Petranka J.W.,
    4. Rossell C.R. Jr..

    2001. Tulula Wetlands Mitigation Bank. Ecological Restoration 19:74–80.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
18. 1. Moreno-Mateos D.,
    2. Power M.E.,
    3. Comín F.A.,
    4. Yockteng R.

    2012. Structural and functional loss in restored wetland ecosystems. PLoS Biol 10(1): e1001247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001247.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
19. 1. National Research Council

    . 1992. Restoration of aquatic ecosystems. Science, Technology, and Public Policy. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
20. 1. Odum E.P.

    1969. The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164:262–270.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
21. 1. Palik B.J.,
    2. Goebel P.C.,
    3. Kirkman L.K.,
    4. West L.

    2000. Using landscape hierarchies to guide restoration of disturbed ecosystems. Ecological Applications 10:189–202.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. 1. Pastorok R.A.,
    2. MacDonald A.,
    3. Sampson J.R.,
    4. Wilber P.,
    5. Yozzo D.J.,
    6. Titre J.P.

    1997. An ecological decision framework for environmental restoration projects. Ecological Engineering 9:89–107.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. 1. Primm S.L.

    1984. The complexity and stability of ecosystems. Nature 307:321–326.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. 1. Rheinhardt R.D.,
    2. Rheinhardt M.C.,
    3. Brinson M.M.,
    4. Faser K.E. Jr..

    1999. Application of reference data for assessing and restoring headwater ecosystems. Restoration Ecology 7:241–251.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. 1. Rheinhardt R.D.,
    2. McKenney-Easterling M.,
    3. Brinson M.M.,
    4. Masina-Rubbo J.,
    5. Brooks R.P.,
    6. Whigham D.F.,
    7. O-Brien D.,
    8. Hite J.T.,
    9. Armstrong B.K.

    2009. Canopy composition and forest structure provide restoration targets for low-order riparian ecosystems. Restoration Ecology 17:51–59.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
26. 1. Ruiz-Jaen M.C.,
    2. Aide T.M.

    2005. Restoration success: How is it being measured? Restoration Ecology 13:569–577.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
27. 1. Simmons M.T.,
    2. Venhaus H.C.,
    3. Windhager S.

    2007. Exploiting the attributes of regional ecosystems for landscape design: The role of ecological restoration in ecological engineering. Ecological Engineering 30:201–205.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. 1. Society for Ecological Restoration International Science and Policy Working Group

    . 2004. The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration. www.ser.org and Tucson: Society for Ecological Restoration International.
29. 1. Standler E.K.,
    2. Ehrenfeld J.G.

    2009. Rapid assessment of urban wetlands: Do hydrogeomorphic classification and reference criteria work? Environmental Management 43:725–742.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 1. Stanturf J.A.,
    2. Schoenholtz S.H.,
    3. Schweitzer C.J.,
    4. Shepard J.P.

    2001. Achieving restoration success: Myths in bottomland hardwood forests. Restoration Ecology 9:189–200.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
31. 1. Tilman D.

    1996. Biodiversity: Population versus ecosystem stability. Ecology 77:350–363.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. 1. Vitousek P.M.,
    2. Reiners W.A.

    1975. Ecosystem succession and nutrient retention: A hypothesis. Bioscience 25:376–381.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
33. 1. Wassen M.J.

    2005. The use of reference areas in the conservation and restoration of riverine wetlands. Ecohydrology and Hydrobiology 5:41–49.

    OpenUrl
34. 1. Whigham D.F.

    1999. Ecological issues related to wetland preservation, restoration, creation, and assessment. The Science of the Total Environment 240:31–40.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
35. 1. Wyant J.G.,
    2. Meganck R.A.,
    3. Ham S.H.

    1995. A planning and decision-making framework for ecological restoration. Environmental Management 19:789–796.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
36. 1. Zedler J.B.,
    2. Callaway J.C.

    1999. Tracking wetland restoration: Do mitigation sites follow desired trajectories? Restoration Ecology 7:69–73.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science