Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UW Press Journals
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Ecological Restoration
  • Other Publications
    • UW Press Journals
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Ecological Restoration

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Article

Socio-Economic Indicators for Forest Restoration Projects

Andrew Egan and Vicky Estrada
Ecological Restoration, September 2013, 31 (3) 302-316; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/er.31.3.302
Andrew Egan
Estrada Collaborative Resource Management, LLC,5912 Royal Oak St. NE, Alburquerque, NM .
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: egana{at}brandonu.ca vicjuabus{at}msn.com
Vicky Estrada
Estrada Collaborative Resource Management, LLC,5912 Royal Oak St. NE, Alburquerque, NM .
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: vicjuabus{at}msn.com
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

    1. Beckley T.,
    2. Parkins J.,
    3. Stedman R.
    2002. Indicators of forest-dependent community stability: The evolution of research. Forestry Chronicle 78:626–636.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Bliss J.,
    2. Aplet G.,
    3. Hartzell C.,
    4. Harwood P.,
    5. Jahnige J.,
    6. Kittredge D.,
    7. Lewandowski S.,
    8. Soscia M.
    2001. Community-based ecosystem monitoring. Pages 143–168 in Gray G.J., Enzer M.J., Kusel J. (eds), Understanding Community-Based Forest Ecosystem Management. New York: Food Products Press.
    1. Bonfantine K.,
    2. Zebrowski J.,
    3. Egan A.
    2011. Guidelines and protocols for monitoring riparian forest restoration projects. New Mexico Forest and Watershed Restoration Institute, New Mexico Highlands University, Las Vegas, NM.
    1. Dalkey N.,
    2. Helmer O.
    1962. An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science 9:458.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
    1. Derr T.,
    2. Moote A.,
    3. Savage M.,
    4. Schumann M.,
    5. Abrams J.,
    6. McCarthy L.,
    7. Love K.
    2005. Handbook Five: Monitoring social and economic effects of forest restoration. Ecological Restoration Institute, Northern Arizona University.
    1. Derr T,
    2. Krasilovsky E.
    2009. Final Report. Technical Assistance in Multiparty Monitoring 2009.
    1. de Steiguer J.E.,
    2. Pye J.M.,
    3. Love C.S.
    1990. Air pollution damage to U.S. forests. Journal of Forestry 88:17–22.
    OpenUrl
    1. Egan A.,
    2. Jones S.,
    3. Luloff A.,
    4. Finley J.
    1995. The value of using multiple methods: An illustration using survey, focus group, and Delphi techniques. Society and Natural Resources 8:457–465.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Egan A.,
    2. Jenkins A.,
    3. Rowe J.
    1996. Forest roads in West Virginia, USA: Identifying issues and challenges. Journal of Forest Engineering 8:33–40.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
    1. Egan A.,
    2. Jones S.
    1997. Determining forest harvest impact assessment criteria using expert opinion: A Delphi study. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 14:20–25.
    OpenUrl
    1. Egan A,
    2. Estrada V.
    2011. Socioeconomic indicators for forest restoration projects. New Mexico Forest and Watershed Restoration Institute, New Mexico Highlands University, Las Vegas, NM.
    1. Egan D,
    2. Howell E.
    2001. The Historical Ecology Handbook: A Restorationist’s Guide to Reference Ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
    1. Estrada V.,
    2. McGrath D.,
    3. Krasilovsky E.,
    4. Evans A.
    2009. Assessing the socioeconomic benefits of New Mexico’s Collaborative Forest Restoration Program: Issues, indicators, and recommendations. New Mexico Forest and Watershed Restoration Institute, New Mexico Highlands University, Las Vegas, NM.
    1. Force J.,
    2. Machlis G.
    1997. The human ecosystem part II: Social indicators in ecosystem management. Society and Natural Resources 10:369–382.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Forestry Working Group
    . 1995. Criteria and indicators for the conservation and sustainable management of temperate and boreal forests. The Montreal Process. Ottawa Canadian Forest Service.
    1. Gray G.,
    2. Enzer M.,
    3. Kusel J.
    2001. Understanding community-based forest ecosystem management: An editorial synthesis. Pages 1–23 in Gray G.J., Enzer M.J., Kusel J. (eds), Understanding Community-Based Forest Ecosystem Management. New York: Food Products Press.
    1. Gregersen H.M.,
    2. Lundgren A.L.,
    3. Jakes P.J.,
    4. Bengsten D.N.
    1990. Identifying emerging issues in forestry as a tool for research planning. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NC-137.
    1. Hobbs R.,
    2. Norton D.
    1996. Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 4:93–110.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Kusel J.
    2001. Assessing well-being in forest dependent communities. Pages 359–384 in Gray G.J., Enzer M.J., Kusel J. (eds), Understanding Community-Based Forest Ecosystem Management. New York: Food Products Press.
    1. Machlis G.,
    2. Force J.,
    3. Burch W.
    1997. The human ecosystem, part I: The human ecosystem as an organizing concept in ecosystem management. Society and Natural Resources 10:347–367.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Magis K.
    2010. Community resilience: An indicator of social sustainability. Society and Natural Resources 23:401–416.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. MacDonlad G.,
    2. Lane M.
    2004. Converging global indicators for sustainable forest management. Forest Policy and Economics 6:63–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Moote A.,
    2. Savage M.,
    3. Abrams J.,
    4. Schumann M.,
    5. Derr T.,
    6. Krasilovski E.
    2008. Short guide for grant recipients. Ecological Restoration Institute, Northern Arizona University.
    1. Moote M.,
    2. Burke S.,
    3. Cortner H.,
    4. Wallace M.
    1994. Principles of Ecosystem Management. Tucson, AZ: Water Resources Research Center, College of Agriculture, The University of Arizona.
    1. Patton M.Q.
    1980. Qualitative evaluation methods. Beverly Hills, CA.: Sage Publications.
    1. Rossi R,
    2. Gilmartin K.
    1980. The handbook of social indicators: Sources, characteristics, and analysis. New York: Garland STMP Press.
    1. Schuster E.G.,
    2. Frissell S.S.,
    3. Baker E.E.,
    4. Loveless R.S.
    1985. The Delphi method: Application to elk habitat quality. Wildlife Conservation and Management. USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-353.
    1. Shafer E.L.,
    2. Moeller G.H.,
    3. Getty R.E.
    1974. Future leisure environments. USDA Forest Service Research Paper NE-301.
    1. Society for Ecological Restoration Science and Policy Working Group (SER)
    . 2002. The SER Primer on Ecological Restoration, 2002. www.ser.org/Primer.pdf.
    1. Stanturf J.
    2004. What is forest restoration? Pages 3–11 in Stanturf J., Madsen P. (eds), Restoration of Boreal and Temperate Forests. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
    1. Walker G,
    2. Daniels S.
    2001. Natural resource policy and the paradox of public involvement: Bringing scientistst and citizens together. Pages 253–269 in Gray G.J., Enzer M.J., Kusel J. (eds), Understanding Community-Based Forest Ecosystem Management. New York: Food Products Press.
    1. Wright P.,
    2. Alward G.,
    3. Colby J.,
    4. Hoekstra T.,
    5. Tegler B.,
    6. Turner M.
    2002. Monitoring for forest management unit scale sustainability: The local unit criteria and indicators development (LUCID) test. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service Inventory and Monitoring Report No. 5.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ecological Restoration: 31 (3)
Ecological Restoration
Vol. 31, Issue 3
1 Sep 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ecological Restoration.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Socio-Economic Indicators for Forest Restoration Projects
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ecological Restoration
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ecological Restoration web site.
Citation Tools
Socio-Economic Indicators for Forest Restoration Projects
Andrew Egan, Vicky Estrada
Ecological Restoration Sep 2013, 31 (3) 302-316; DOI: 10.3368/er.31.3.302

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Socio-Economic Indicators for Forest Restoration Projects
Andrew Egan, Vicky Estrada
Ecological Restoration Sep 2013, 31 (3) 302-316; DOI: 10.3368/er.31.3.302
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating Restoration Techniques for Degraded Steppe Rangelands
  • Restoring Frequent Fire Results in Habitat Improvement for Bison but Minimal Early Reduction of Woody Encroachment
  • Species Interactions Critical to Restoration Success in an Urban Living Shoreline
Show more Research Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Delphi process
  • snowball sampling
  • watershed restoration
UW Press logo

© 2026 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire