Amending Soil with Mulched European Buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica) Does Not Reduce Reinvasion

References

1. 1. Adams C.R.,
   2. Galatowitsch S.M.

   2006. Increasing the effectiveness of reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) control in wet meadow restorations. Restoration Ecology 14:441–451.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. 1. Alpert P.

   2010. Amending invasion with carbon: After fifteen years, a partial success. Rangelands 32:12–15.

   OpenUrl
3. 1. Anderson M.J.

   2001. Permutation tests for univariate or multivariate analysis of variance and regression. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58:626–639.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. 1. Anderson M.J.,
   2. Gorley R.N.,
   3. Clarke K.R.

   2008. PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER: Guide to Software and Statistical Methods. Plymouth: PRIMERE Ltd.
5. 1. Archibold O.W.,
   2. Brooks D.,
   3. Delanoy L.

   1997. An investigation of the invasive shrub European buckthorn, Rhamnus cathartica L., near Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. Canadian Field-Naturalist 111:617–621.

   OpenUrlWeb of Science
6. 1. Averett J.M.,
   2. Klips R.A.,
   3. Nave L.E.,
   4. Frey S.D.,
   5. Curtis P.S.

   2004. Effects of soil carbon amendment on nitrogen availability and plant growth in an experimental tallgrass prairie restoration. Restoration Ecology 12:568–574.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. 1. Blumenthal D.M.,
   2. Jordan N.R.,
   3. Russelle M.P.

   2003. Soil carbon addition controls weeds and facilitates prairie restoration. Ecological Applications 13:605–615.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. 1. Cassidy T.M.,
   2. Fownes J.H.,
   3. Harrington R.A.

   2004. Nitrogen limits an invasive perennial shrub in forest understory. Biological Invasions 6:113–121.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. 1. Catling P.M.

   1997. The problem of invading alien trees and shrubs: some observations in Ontario and a Canadian checklist. Canadian Field Naturalist 111:338–342.

   OpenUrlWeb of Science
10. 1. Cornwell W.K.,
    2. Cornelissen J.H.C.,
    3. Allison S.D.,
    4. Bauhus J.,
    5. Eggleton P.,
    6. Preston C.M.,
    7. Scarff F.,
    8. Weedon J.T.,
    9. Wirth C.,
    10. Zanne A.E.

    2009. Plant traits and wood fates across the globe: Rotted, burned, or consumed? Global Change Biology 15:2431–2449.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. 1. Doane T.A.,
    2. Horwath W.R.

    2003. Spectrophotometric determination of nitrate with a single reagent. Analytical Letters 36:2713–2722.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. 1. Drayton B.,
    2. Primack R.B.

    1999. Experimental extinction of garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata) populations: Implications for weed science and conservation biology. Biological Invasions 1:159–167.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. 1. Dukes J.S.,
    2. Mooney H.A.

    1999. Does global change increase the success of biological invaders? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 14:135–139.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 1. Ehrenfeld J.G.,
    2. Kourtev P.,
    3. Huang W.Z.

    2001. Changes in soil functions following invasions of exotic understory plants in deciduous forests. Ecological Applications 11:1287–1300.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. 1. Grime J.P.

    1977. Evidence for existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. American Naturalist 111:1169–1194.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. 1. Hartman K.M.,
    2. McCarthy B.C.

    2004. Restoration of a forest understory after the removal of an invasive shrub, Amur honeysuckle (Lonicera maackii). Restoration Ecology 12:154–165.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. 1. Heneghan L.,
    2. Umek L.,
    3. Bernau B.,
    4. Grady K.,
    5. Iatropulos J.,
    6. Jabon D.,
    7. Workman M.

    2009. Ecological research can augment restoration practice in urban areas degraded by invasive species: Examples from Chicago Wilderness. Urban Ecosystems 12:63–77.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
18. 1. Hutchinson T.F.,
    2. Vankat J.L.

    1997. Invasibility and effects of Amur honeysuckle in southwestern Ohio forests. Conservation Biology 11:1117–1124.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. 1. Iannone B.V. III.

    . 2013. Utilizing multiple approaches to investigate the ecology of Rhamnus cathartica L. invasion and management. PhD dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago.
20. 1. Iannone B.V. III.,
    2. Rosen C.J.,
    3. Galatowitsch S.M.

    2009. Soil nitrogen concentrations in a restored sedge meadow wetland as affected by the application of high C:N amendments. Ecological Restoration 27:193–199.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
21. 1. Ingold J.L.,
    2. Craycraft M.J.

    1983. Avian frugivory on honeysuckle (Lonicera) in southwestern Ohio in fall. The Ohio Journal of Science 83:256–258.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
22. 1. Jarrell W.M.,
    2. Armstrong D.E.,
    3. Grigal D.F.,
    4. Kelly E.F.,
    5. Monger H.C.,
    6. Wedin D.A.

    1999. Soil water and temperature status. Pages 55–73 in Robertson G.P., Coleman D.C., Bledsoe C.S., Sollins P. (eds), Standard Soil Methods for Long-Term Ecological Research. New York: Oxford University Press.
23. 1. Kurylo J.S.,
    2. Knight K.S.,
    3. Stewart J.R.,
    4. Endress A.G.

    2007. Rhamnus cathartica: native and naturalized distribution and habitat preferences. The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 134:420–430.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. 1. Luken J.O.,
    2. Mattimiro D.T.

    1991. Habitat-specific resilience of the invasive shrub Amur honeysuckle (Lonicera maackii) during repeated clipping. Ecological Applications 1:104–109.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. 1. Malone C.R.

    1967. A rapid method for enumeration of viable seeds in soil. Weeds 15:381–382.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
26. 1. Martin P.H.,
    2. Canham C.D.,
    3. Marks P.L.

    2009. Why forests appear resistant to exotic plant invasions: Intentional introductions, stand dynamics, and the role of shade tolerance. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7:142–149.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
27. 1. Mascaro J.,
    2. Schnitzer S.A.

    2007. Rhamnus cathartica L. (common buckthorn) as an ecosystem dominant in southern Wisconsin forests. Northeastern Naturalist 14:387–402.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. 1. Moody M.E.,
    2. Mack R.N.

    1988. Controlling the spread of plant invasions: The importance of nascent foci. Journal of Applied Ecology 25:1009–1021.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
29. 1. Morghan K.J.R.,
    2. Seastedt T.R.

    1999. Effects of soil nitrogen reduction on nonnative plants in restored grasslands. Restoration Ecology 7:51–55.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. 1. Packard S.,
    2. Mutel C.F.

    1997. The Tallgrass Restoration Handbook. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
31. 1. Perry L.,
    2. Blumenthal D.,
    3. Monaco T.,
    4. Paschke M.,
    5. Redente E.

    2010. Immobilizing nitrogen to control plant invasion. Oecologia 163:13–24.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 1. R Development Core Team

    . 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. www.R-project.org.
33. 1. Rejmánek M.

    2000. Invasive plants: Approaches and predictions. Austral Ecology 25:497–506.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. 1. Rejmánek M.,
    2. Richardson D.M.

    1996. What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77:1655–1661.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
35. 1. Rhine E.D.,
    2. Mulvaney R.L.,
    3. Pratt E.J.,
    4. Sims G.K.

    1998. Improving the Berthelot reaction for determining ammonium in soil extracts and water. Soil Science Society of America Journal 62:473–480.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
36. 1. Robertson G.P.,
    2. Sollins P.,
    3. Ellis B.G.,
    4. Lajtha K.

    1999. Exchangeable ions, pH, and cation exchange capacity. Pages 106–114 in Robertson G.P., Coleman D.C., Bledsoe C.S., Sollins P. (eds), Standard Soil Methods for Long-Term Ecological Research. Oxford University Press.
37. 1. Runkle J.R.,
    2. DiSalvo A.,
    3. Graham-Gibson Y.,
    4. Dorning M.

    2005. Vegetation release eight years after removal of Lonicera maackii in West-Central Ohio. The Ohio Journal of Science 107:125–129.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
38. 1. Silander J.A.,
    2. Klepeis D.M.

    1999. The invasion ecology of Japanese barberry (Berberis thunbergii) in the New England landscape. Biological Invasions 1:189–201.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
39. 1. Simoni J.,
    2. Van Thiel B.,
    3. Wolthusen L.

    2012. Buckthorn Report. The Aldo Leopold Foundation. www.aldoleopold.org/images/enewsletter/BuckthornReport2012.pdf.
40. 1. Sollins P.,
    2. Glassman C.,
    3. Paul E.A.,
    4. Swanston C.,
    5. Lajtha K.,
    6. Heil J.W.,
    7. Elliott E.T.

    1999. Soil carbon and nitrogen pools and fractions. Pages 89–105 in Robertson G.P., Coleman D.C., Bledsoe C.S., Sollins P. (eds), Standard Soil Methods for Long-Term Ecological Research. New York: Oxford University Press.
41. 1. Stevenson F.J.,
    2. Cole M.A.

    1986. Cycles of Soil: Carbon, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Sulfur, Micronutrients. New York: Wiley.
42. 1. US Department of Agriculture [USDA]

    . 2012. Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey. websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm.
43. 1. Wedin D.,
    2. Tilman D.

    1990. Species effects on nitrogen cycling: A test with perennial grasses. Oecologia 84:433–441.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
44. 1. Woods K.D.

    1993. Effects of invasion by Lonicera tatarica L. on herbs and tree seedlings in four New England forests. American Midland Naturalist 130:62–74.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
45. 1. Zink T.A.,
    2. Allen M.F.

    1998. The effects of organic amendments on the restoration of a disturbed coastal sage scrub habitat. Restoration Ecology 6:52–58.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
46. 1. Zuur A.F.,
    2. Ieno E.N.,
    3. Walker N.J.,
    4. Saveliev A.A.,
    5. Smith G.M.

    2009. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. New York: Springer Science and Business Media.