Spanning the Science-Practice Divide: Why Restoration Scientists Need to be More Involved with Practice

References

1. 1. Allen E.B.,
   2. Covington W.W.,
   3. Falk D.A.

   1997. Developing the conceptual basis for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 5:275–276.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. 1. Arlettaz R.,
   2. Schaub M.,
   3. Fournier J.,
   4. Reichlin T.S.,
   5. Sierro A.,
   6. Watson J.E.M.,
   7. Braunisch V.

   2010. From publications to public actions: When conservation biologists bridge the gap between research and implementation. BioScience 60:835–842.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Baasch A.,
   2. Tischew S.,
   3. Bruelheide H.

   2010. How much effort is required for proper monitoring? Assessing the effects of different survey scenarios in a dry acidic grassland. Journal of Vegetation Science 21:876–887.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. 1. Bernhardt E.S.,
   2. Sudduth E.B.,
   3. Palmer M.A.,
   4. Allan J.D.,
   5. Meyer J.L.,
   6. Alexander G.,
   7. Follastad-Shah J.,
   8. Hassett B.,
   9. Jenkinson R.,
   10. Lave R.,
   11. Rumps J.,
   12. Pagano L.

   2007. Restoring rivers one reach at a time: Results from a survey of U.S. river restoration practitioners. Restoration Ecology 15:482–493.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. 1. Cabin R.J.

   2007. Science-driven restoration: A square grid on a round earth? Restoration Ecology 15:1–7.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. 1. Cabin R.J.,
   2. Clewell A.,
   3. Ingram M.,
   4. McDonald T.,
   5. Temperton V.

   2010. Bridging restoration science and practice: Results and analysis of a survey from the 2009 Society for Ecological Restoration International Meeting. Restoration Ecology 18:783–788.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. 1. Chazdon R.L.,
   2. Harvey C.A.,
   3. Komar O.,
   4. Griffith D.M.,
   5. Ferguson B.G.,
   6. Mart M.

   2011. Beyond Reserves: A research agenda for conserving biodiversity in human-modified Tropical Landscapes 41:142–153.

   OpenUrl
8. 1. DellaSala D.A.,
   2. Martin A.,
   3. Spivak R.,
   4. Schulke T.,
   5. Bird B.,
   6. Criley M.,
   7. van Daalen C.,
   8. Kreilick J.,
   9. Brown R.,
   10. Aplet G.

   2003. A citizen’s call for ecological forest restoration: Forest restoration principles and criteria. Ecological Restoration 21:14–23.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
9. 1. Ehrenfeld J.G.

   2000. Defining the limits of restoration: The need for realistic goals. Restoration Ecology 8:2–9.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. 1. Giardina C.P.,
    2. Litton C.M.,
    3. Thaxton J.M.,
    4. Cordell S.,
    5. Hadway L.J.,
    6. Sandquist D.R.

    2007. Science driven restoration: A candle in a demon haunted world? Response to (Cabin 2007) Restoration Ecology 15:171–176.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. 1. Gibbons P.,
    2. Zammit C.,
    3. Youngentob K.,
    4. Possingham H.P.,
    5. Lindenmayer D.B.,
    6. Bekessy S.,
    7. Burgman M.,
    8. Colyvan M.,
    9. Considine M.,
    10. Felton A.,
    11. Hobbs R.J.,
    12. Hurley K.,
    13. McAlpine C.,
    14. McCarthy M. A.,
    15. Moore J.,
    16. Robinson D.,
    17. Salt D.,
    18. Wintle B.

    2008. Some practical suggestions for improving engagement between researchers and policy-makers in natural resource management. Ecological Management and Restoration 9:182–186.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. 1. Gonzalo-Turpin H.,
    2. Couix N.,
    3. Hazard L.

    2008. Rethinking partnerships with the aim of producing knowledge with practical relevance: A case study in the field of ecological restoration. Ecology and Society 13:53.

    OpenUrl
13. 1. Halle S.

    2007. Science, Art, or Application? The “Karma” of Restoration Ecology. Restoration Ecology 15:358–361.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. 1. Hassett B.A.,
    2. Palmer M.A.,
    3. Bernhardt E.S.

    2007. Evaluating stream restoration in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed through practitioner interviews. Restoration Ecology 15:563–572.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. 1. Hobbs R.J.

    2007. Setting effective and realistic restoration goals: Key directions for research. Restoration Ecology 15:354–357.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. 1. Hobbs R.J.,
    2. Higgs E.,
    3. Harris J.A.

    2009. Novel ecosystems: Implications for conservation and restoration. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24:599–605.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 1. Hobbs R.J.,
    2. Norton D.

    1996. Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 4(2):93–110.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. 1. Hoeksema J.D.,
    2. Chaudhary V. B.,
    3. Gehring C.A.,
    4. Johnson N.C.,
    5. Karst J.,
    6. Koide R.T.,
    7. Pringle A.,
    8. Zabinski C.,
    9. Bever J.D.,
    10. Moore J.C.,
    11. Wilson G.T.,
    12. Klironomos J.N.,
    13. Umbanhowar J.

    2010. A meta-analysis of context-dependency in plant response to inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi. Ecology Letters 13:394–407.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 1. Kardol P.,
    2. Wardle D.A.

    2010. How understanding aboveground-belowground linkages can assist restoration ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25:670–9.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 1. Katz S.L.,
    2. Barnas K.,
    3. Hicks R.,
    4. Cowen J.,
    5. Jenkinson R.

    2007. Freshwater habitat restoration actions in the Pacific Northwest: A decade’s investment in habitat improvement. Restoration Ecology 15:494–505.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
21. 1. Kentula M.E.

    2000. Perspectives on setting success criteria for wetland restoration. Ecological Engineering 15:199–209.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. 1. Kondolf G.M.,
    2. Anderson S.,
    3. Lave R.,
    4. Pagano L.,
    5. Merenlender A.,
    6. Bernhardt E.S.

    2007. Two decades of river restoration in California: What can we learn? Restoration Ecology 15:516–523.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. 1. Matthews J.W,
    2. Endress A.G.

    2008. Performance criteria compliance success, and vegetation developement in compensitory mitigation wetlands. Environmental Management 41:130–141.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
24. 1. Matthews J.W.,
    2. Spyreas G.,
    3. Endress A.G.

    2009. Trajectories of vegetation-based indicators used to assess wetland restoration progress. Ecological Applications 19:2093–2107.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 1. Meade R.J.,
    2. Consulting, Inc

    . 1996. Natural Community Conservation Plan and Habitat Conservation Plan: County of Orange Central and Coastal Sub Region Parts 1 and 2: NCCP/HCP. County of Orange, California.
26. 1. Neumann M.

    2007. Web-based data, document, and knowledge management in restoration projects. Restoration Ecology 15:326–329.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
27. 1. Orsi F.,
    2. Geneletti D.,
    3. Newton A.C.

    2011. Towards a common set of criteria and indicators to identify forest restoration priorities: An expert panel-based approach. Ecological Indicators 11:337–347.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. 1. O’Donnell T.K.,
    2. Galat D.L.

    2008. Evaluating success criteria and project monitoring in river enhancement within an adaptive management framework. Environmental Management 41:90–105.

    OpenUrlPubMed
29. 1. Palmer M.A.,
    2. Bernhardt E.S.,
    3. Allen J.D.,
    4. Lake P.S.,
    5. Alexander G.,
    6. Brooks S.,
    7. Carr J.,
    8. Clayton S.,
    9. Dahm C.N.,
    10. Follstad Shah J.,
    11. Galat D.L.,
    12. Loss S.G.,
    13. Goodwin P.,
    14. Hart D.D.,
    15. Hassestt B.,
    16. Jenkinson R.,
    17. Kondolf G.M.,
    18. Lave R.,
    19. Meyers J.L.,
    20. O’Donnell T.K.,
    21. Pagano L.,
    22. Sudduth E.

    2005. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:208–217.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. 1. Palmer M.A.

    2009. Reforming watershed restoration: Science in need of application and applications in need of science. Estuaries and Coasts 32:1–17.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
31. 1. Palmer M.,
    2. Allan J.D.,
    3. Meyer J.,
    4. Bernhardt E.S.

    2007. River restoration in the twenty-first century: Data and experiential knowledge to inform future efforts. Restoration Ecology 15:472–481.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. 1. Reiss K.,
    2. Hernandez E.,
    3. Brown M.T.

    2009. Evaluation of permit success in wetland mitigation banking: A Florida case study. BioOne 29:907–918.

    OpenUrl
33. 1. Rodrigues R.R.,
    2. Lima R.A. F.,
    3. Gandolfi S.,
    4. Nave A.G.

    2009. On the restoration of high diversity forests: 30 years of experience in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biological Conservation 142:1242–1251.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. 1. Rowe H.I.

    2010. Tricks of the trade: Techniques and opinions from 38 experts in tallgrass prairie restoration. Restoration Ecology 18:253–262.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
35. 1. Suding K.N.,
    2. Hobbs R.J.

    2009. Threshold models in restoration and conservation: A developing framework. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24:271–9.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. 1. Tischew S.,
    2. Baasch A.,
    3. Conrad M.K.,
    4. Kirmer A.

    2010. Evaluating restoration success of frequently implemented compensation measures: Results and demands for control procedures. Restoration Ecology 18:467–480.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
37. 1. Tischew S.,
    2. Kirmer A.

    2007. Implementation of basic studies in the ecological restoration of surface-mined land. Restoration Ecology 15:321–325.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
38. 1. Weiher E.

    2007. On the status of restoration science: Obstacles and opportunities. Restoration Ecology 15:340–343.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
39. 1. Wyant J.G.,
    2. Lane B.,
    3. Meganck R.A.,
    4. Ham S.H.

    1995. Planning and decision-making framework for ecological restoration. Environmental Management 19:789–796.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
40. 1. Zedler J.B.

    2007. Success: An unclear, subjective descriptor of restoration outcomes. Ecological Restoration 25:162–168.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text