Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UW Press Journals
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Ecological Restoration
  • Other Publications
    • UW Press Journals
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Ecological Restoration

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleRestoration Notes

Should Coral Fragments Collected for Restoration be Subdivided to Create More, Smaller Pieces for Transplanting?

Graham Forrester, Russell Dauksis and Megan Ferguson
Ecological Restoration, March 2013, 31 (1) 4-7; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/er.31.1.4
Graham Forrester
Department of Natural Resources Science, University of Rhode Island, 105 Coastal Institute, 1 Greenhouse Rd, Kingston, RI 02881,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: gforrester{at}uri.edu
Russell Dauksis
Department of Biological Science, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Megan Ferguson
Department of Biological Science, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

    1. Abramoff M.D.,
    2. Magelhaes P.J.,
    3. Ram S.J.
    2004. Image Processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics International 11:36–42.
    OpenUrl
    1. Bowden-Kerby A.
    2001. Low-tech coral reef restoration methods modeled after natural fragmentation processes. Bulletin of Marine Science 69:915–931.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
    1. Bruckner A.W.,
    2. Bruckner R.J.
    2001. Condition of restored Acropora palmata fragments off Mona Island, Puerto Rico, two years after the Fortuna Reefer ship grounding. Coral reefs 20:235–243.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Bythell J.C.,
    2. Pan P.,
    3. Lee J.
    2001. Three-dimensional morphometric measurements of reef corals using underwater photogrammetry techniques. Coral reefs 20:193–199.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Cook R.E.
    1979. Asexual reproduction—further consideration. American Naturalist 113:769–772.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Epstein N.,
    2. Bak R.P.M.,
    3. Rinkevich B.
    2001. Strategies for gardening denuded coral reef areas: The applicability of using different types of coral material for reef restoration. Restoration Ecology 9:432–442.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Forrester G.E.,
    2. Maynard A.,
    3. Schofield S.,
    4. Taylor K.
    2012. Evaluating causes of transplanting stress in fragments of Acropora palmata used for coral reef restoration. Bulletin of Marine Science 88:1099–1113.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Forrester G.E.,
    2. O’Connell-Rodwell C.,
    3. Baily P.,
    4. Forrester L.M.,
    5. Giovannini S.,
    6. Harmon L.,
    7. Karis R.,
    8. Krumholz J.,
    9. Rodwell T.,
    10. Jarecki L.
    2011. Evaluating methods for transplanting endangered elkhorn corals in the Virgin Islands. Restoration Ecology 19:299–306.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Forsman Z.H.,
    2. Rinkevich B.,
    3. Hunter C.L.
    2006. Investigating fragment size for culturing reef-building corals (Porites lobata and P. compressa) in ex situ nurseries. Aquaculture 261:89–97.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Gardner T.A.,
    2. Cote I.M.,
    3. Gill J.A.,
    4. Grant A.,
    5. Watkinson A.R.
    2003. Long-term region-wide declines in Caribbean corals. Science 301:958–960.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Garrison V.,
    2. Ward G.
    2008. Storm-generated coral fragments: A viable source of transplants for reef rehabilitation. Biological Conservation 141:3089–3100.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Hughes T.P.
    1984. Population dynamics based on individual size rather than age: A general model with a reef coral example. American Naturalist 123:778–795.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Krumholz J.,
    2. Barber T.,
    3. Jadot C.
    2010. Avoiding “Band-Aid” solutions in ecosystem restorations. Ecological Restoration 28:17–19.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Precht W.F.
    2006. Coral Reef Restoration Handbook: The Rehabilitation of an Ecosystem Under Siege. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
    1. Precht W.F.,
    2. Robbart M.L.,
    3. Aronson R.B.
    2004. The potential listing of Acropora species under the US Endangered Species Act. Marine Pollution Bulletin 49:534–536.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Rinkevich B.
    2005. Conservation of coral reefs through active restoration measures: Recent approaches and last decade progress. Environmental Science and Technology 39:4333–4342.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Rogers C.S.,
    2. Suchanek T.H.,
    3. Pecora F.A.
    1982. Effects of hurricanes David and Frederic (1979) on shallow Acropora palmata reef communities: St. Croix, United States Virgin Islands. Bulletin of Marine Science 32:532–548.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
    1. Schutte V.G.W.,
    2. Selig E.R.,
    3. Bruno J.F.
    2010. Regional spatio-temporal trends in Caribbean coral reef benthic communities. Marine Ecology Progress Series 402:115–122.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Shafir S.,
    2. Rijn J.V.,
    3. Rinkevich B.
    2006. A mid-water coral nursery. Pages 1674–1679 in Proceedings of 10th International Coral Reef Symposium. Okinawa, Japan.
    1. Smith L.D.,
    2. Hughes T.P.
    1999. An experimental assessment of survival, re-attachment and fecundity of coral fragments. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 235:147–164.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Soong K.,
    2. Chen T.A.
    2003. Coral transplantation: Regeneration and growth of Acropora fragments in a nursery. Restoration Ecology 11:62–71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Williams D.E.,
    2. Miller M.W.
    2010. Stabilization of fragments to enhance asexual recruitment in Acropora palmata, a threatened Caribbean coral. Restoration Ecology 18:446–451.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Yap H.T.,
    2. Alino P.M.,
    3. Gomez E.D.
    1992. Trends in growth and mortality of 3 coral species (Anthozoa, Scleractinia), including effects of transplantation. Marine Ecology Progress Series 83:91–101.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ecological Restoration: 31 (1)
Ecological Restoration
Vol. 31, Issue 1
1 Mar 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ecological Restoration.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Should Coral Fragments Collected for Restoration be Subdivided to Create More, Smaller Pieces for Transplanting?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ecological Restoration
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ecological Restoration web site.
Citation Tools
Should Coral Fragments Collected for Restoration be Subdivided to Create More, Smaller Pieces for Transplanting?
Graham Forrester, Russell Dauksis, Megan Ferguson
Ecological Restoration Mar 2013, 31 (1) 4-7; DOI: 10.3368/er.31.1.4

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Should Coral Fragments Collected for Restoration be Subdivided to Create More, Smaller Pieces for Transplanting?
Graham Forrester, Russell Dauksis, Megan Ferguson
Ecological Restoration Mar 2013, 31 (1) 4-7; DOI: 10.3368/er.31.1.4
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Caribbean Damselfish Recolonize Reefs Following Coral Restoration
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Restoration of an Andean Peatland Influences Wildlife
  • Post-fire Management in Northern Cyprus
  • The Muddy Creek Design for Beaver Dam Analogs
Show more Restoration Notes

Similar Articles

UW Press logo

© 2026 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire