Forecasting Avian Responses to Elwha River Restoration

References

1. 1. Alldredge M.W.,
   2. Simons T.R.,
   3. Pollock K.H.

   2007. A field evaluation of distance measurement error in auditory avian point count surveys. Journal of Wildlife Management 71:2759–2766.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. 1. Ambuel B.,
   2. Temple S.A.

   1983. Area-dependent changes in the bird communities and vegetation of southern Wisconsin forests. Ecology 64:1057–1068.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Anderson D.R.,
   2. Burnham K.P.

   2002. Avoiding pitfalls when using information-theoretic methods. Journal of Wildlife Management 66:912–918.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. 1. Andrews E.D.

   1986. Downstream effects of Flaming Gorge Reservoir on the Green River, Colorado and Utah. Geological Society of America Bulletin 97:1012–1023.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
5. 1. Bednarek A.T.

   2001. Undamming rivers: A review of the ecological impacts of dam Removal. Environmental Management 27:803–814.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 1. Bender D.J.,
   2. Contreras T.A.,
   3. Fahrig L.

   1998. Habitat loss and population decline: a meta-analysis of the patch size effect. Ecology 79:517–533.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. 1. Benson T.J.,
   2. Dinsmore J.J.,
   3. Hohman W.L.

   2006. Changes in land cover and breeding bird populations with restoration of riparian habitats in east-central Iowa. Journal of the Iowa Academy of Sciences 113:10–16.

   OpenUrl
8. 1. Blake J.G.,
   2. Karr J.R.

   1987. Breeding birds of isolated woodlots: area and habitat relationships. Ecology 68:1724–1734.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. 1. Brand L.A.,
   2. Stromberg J.C.,
   3. Noon B.R.

   2010. Avian density and nest survival on the San Pedro River: Importance of vegetation type and hydrologic regime. Journal of Wildlife Management 74:739–754.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. 1. Bromley C

    . 2008. The morphodynamics of sediment movement through a reservoir during dam removal. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nottingham, UK.
11. 1. Bull E.L.,
    2. Skovlin J.

    1982. Relationships between avifauna and streamside vegetation. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resource Conference 47:496–506.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
12. 1. Burnham K.P.,
    2. Anderson D.R.

    2002. Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
13. 1. Carignan V.,
    2. Villard M.A.

    2002. Selecting indicator species to monitor ecological integrity: A review. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 78: 45–61.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 1. Chenoweth J.,
    2. Acker S.A.,
    3. McHenry M.L.

    2011. Revegetation and restoration plan for Lake Mills and Lake Aldwell. Olympic National Park and the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, Port Angeles, WA. www.nps.gov/olym/naturescience/elwha-restroation-docs.htm
15. 1. Childers D.,
    2. Kresch D.,
    3. Gustafson S.,
    4. Randle T.,
    5. Melena J.,
    6. Cluer B.

    2000. Hydrologic data collected during the 1994 Lake Mills drawdown experiment, Elwha River, Washington. United States Geological Survey, Water Resources Investigations Report 99–4215.
16. 1. Clark J.S.,
    2. Carpenter S.R.,
    3. Barber M.,
    4. Collins S.,
    5. Dobson A.,
    6. Foley J.A.,
    7. Lodge D.M.,
    8. Pascual M.,
    9. Pielke R. Jr..,
    10. Pizer W.,
    11. Pringle C.,
    12. Reid W.V.,
    13. Rose K.A.,
    14. Sala O.,
    15. Schlesinger W.H.,
    16. Wall D.H.,
    17. Wear D.

    2001. Ecological forecasts: An emerging imperative. Science 293:657–660.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
17. 1. Cody M.L.

    (ed). 1985. Habitat Selection in Birds. Orlando: Academic Press.
18. 1. Crozier G.E.,
    2. Niemi G.J.

    2003. Using patch and landscape variables to model bird abundance in a naturally heterogeneous landscape. Canadian Journal of Zoology 81:441–452.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. 1. Doyle M.W.,
    2. Stanley E.H.,
    3. Harbor J.M.,
    4. Grant G.S.

    2003. Dam removal in the United States: Emerging needs for science and policy. EOS 84:29–36.

    OpenUrl
20. 1. Duda J.J.,
    2. Freilich J.E.,
    3. Schreiner E.G.

    2008. Baseline studies in the Elwha River ecosystem prior to dam removal: Introduction to the special issue. Northwest Science 82:1–12.

    OpenUrl
21. 1. Dunteman G.H.,
    2. Ho M.R.

    2006. An Introduction to Generalized Linear Models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
22. 1. Franklin A.B.,
    2. Anderson D.R.,
    3. Burnham K.P.

    2002. Estimation of longterm trends and variation in avian survival probabilities using random effects models. Journal of Applied Statistics 29:267–287.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
23. 1. Gardali T.,
    2. Holmes A.L.,
    3. Small S.L.,
    4. Nur N.,
    5. Geupel G.R.,
    6. Golet G.H.

    2006. Abundance patterns of land-birds in restored and remnant riparian forests on the Sacramento River, California, USA. Restoration Ecology 14:391–403.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. 1. Gardali T.,
    2. Holmes A.L.

    2011. Maximizing benefits from riparian revegetation efforts: Local- and landscape-level determinants of avian response. Environmental Management 48:28–37.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 1. Gelarden C.J.

    2008. Forecasting avian responses to Elwha River restoration. MS thesis, Western Washington University.
26. 1. Gibbons D.W.,
    2. Hill D.A.,
    3. Sutherland W.J.

    1996. Birds. Pages 227– 259 in Sutherland W.J. (ed), Ecological Census Techniques: A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. 1. Graf W.L.

    1999. Dam nation: A geographic census of American dams and their large-scale hydrologic impacts. Water Resources Research 35:1305–1311.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
28. 1. Grant G.,
    2. Stewart G.,
    3. Bromley C.,
    4. Lewis S.

    2007. Geomorphic responses to dam removal: New insights from flume and field experiments. Presentation at Ecological Society of America and Society for Ecological Restoration International Joint Conference, San Jose, CA. OOS 44-4.
29. 1. Gray L.J.

    1993. Response of insectivorous birds to emerging aquatic insects in riparian habitats of a tallgrass prairie stream. American Midland Naturalist 129:288–300.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. 1. Gregory S.,
    2. Li H.,
    3. Li J.

    2002. The conceptual basis for ecological responses to dam removal. Bioscience 52:713–723.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
31. 1. Hardin J.W.,
    2. Hilbe J.M.

    2007. Generalized Linear Models and Extensions, 2nd ed. College Station, Texas: Stata Press.
32. 1. Hart D.D.,
    2. Johnson T.E.,
    3. Bushaw-Newton K.L.,
    4. Horwitz R.J.,
    5. Bednarek A.T.,
    6. Charles D.F.,
    7. Kreeger D.A.,
    8. Velinksy D.J.

    2002. Dam removal: Challenges and opportunities for ecological research and river restoration. Bioscience 52:669–681.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. 1. Hastie T.J.,
    2. Pregibon D.

    1991. General linearized models. in Chambers J.M., Hastie T.J. (eds), Statistical Models in S. New York: Chapman and Hall.
34. 1. Hawrot R.Y.,
    2. Niemi G.J.

    1996. Effects of edge type and patch shape on avian communities in a mixed conifer-hardwood forest. Auk 113:586–598.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
35. 1. Hobson K.A.,
    2. Bayne E.M.

    2000. Effects of forest fragmentation by agriculture on avian communities in the southern boreal mixed woods of western Canada. Wilson Bulletin 112:373–387.

    OpenUrl
36. 1. Hosmer D.W.,
    2. Lemeshow S.

    2000. Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd Ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
37. 1. Jansen A.

    2005. Avian use of restoration plantings along a creek linking rainforest patches on the Atherton Tablelands, North Queensland. Restoration Ecology 13:275–283.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
38. 1. Kloehn K.K.,
    2. Beechie T.J.,
    3. Morely S.A.,
    4. Coe H.J.,
    5. Duda J.J.

    2008. Influence of dams on river-floodplain dynamics in the Elwha River, Washington. Northwest Science 82:224–235.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
39. 1. Kohri M.,
    2. Kamada M.,
    3. Nakagoshi N.

    2011. Spatial-temporal distribution of ornithochorus seeds from an Elaeagnus umbellata community dominating a riparian habitat. Plant Species Biology 26:174–185.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
40. 1. Kus B.E.

    1998. Use of restored riparian habitat by the endangered Least Bell’s Vireo (Vireo belli pusillus). Restoration Ecology 6:75–82.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
41. 1. Kus B.E.,
    2. Beck P.P.

    2001. An approach for monitoring bird communities to assess development of restored riparian habitat. Pages 396– 406 in Haber P.M. (ed), California riparian systems: processes and floodplain management, ecology, and restoration. Sacramento, California: Riparian Habitat and Floodplains Conference Proceedings, Riparian Habitat Joint Venture.
42. 1. Latta S.C,
    2. Howell C.A.,
    3. Dettling M.D.,
    4. Cormier R.L.

    2012. Use of data on avian demographics and site persistence during overwintering to assess quality of restored riparian habitat. Conservation Biology 26:482–492.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
43. 1. Lindenmayer D.B.,
    2. Knight E.J.,
    3. Crane M.J.,
    4. Montague-Drake R.,
    5. Michael D.R.,
    6. MacGregor C.I.

    2010. What makes an effective restoration planting for woodland birds? Biological Conservation 143:289–301.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
44. 1. MacArthur R.H.,
    2. MacArthur J.W.

    1961. On bird species diversity. Ecology 42:594–598.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
45. 1. Maguire T.J.,
    2. Hadley K.S.

    2010. A multi-scale assessment of avian diversity following stream rewatering, Owens River Gorge, California. Natural Areas Journal 30:124–137.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
46. 1. Mazerolle M.J.,
    2. Villard M.A.

    1999. Patch characteristics and landscape context as predictors of species presence and abundance: A review. Ecoscience 6:117–124.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
47. 1. McArdle R.E.,
    2. Meyer W.H.

    1930. The yield of Douglas-fir in the Pacific Northwest. USDA, Washington, D.C. Technical Bulletin 201.
48. 1. McGarigal K.,
    2. Cushman S.A.,
    3. Neel M.C.,
    4. Ene E.

    2002. FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical Maps. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA. www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html
49. 1. McGarigal K.,
    2. McComb W.C.

    1995. Relationships between landscape structure and breeding birds in the Oregon Coast range. Ecological Monographs 65:235–260.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
50. 1. McLaughlin J.F.

    2013 (this issue). Engaging birds in vegetation restoration after Elwha dam removal. Restoration Ecology 31:46–56.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
51. 1. Michel J.T.,
    2. Helfield J.M.,
    3. Hooper D.U.

    2011. Seed rain and revegetation of exposed substrates following dam removal on the Elwha River. Northwest Science 85:15–29.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
52. 1. Munro N.T.,
    2. Fischer J.,
    3. Barrett G.,
    4. Wood J.,
    5. Leavesley A.,
    6. Lindenmayer D.B.

    2011. Bird’s response to revegetation of different structure and floristics—Are “restoration plantings” restoring bird communities? Restoration Ecology 19:223–235.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
53. 1. National Park Service (NPS)

    . 1995. Elwha River Ecosystem Restoration: Final Environmental Impact Statement. U.S. National Park Service, Denver, CO: Denver Service Center.
54. 1. National Park Service (NPS)

    . 1996. Elwha River Ecosystem Restoration Implementation: Final Environmental Impact Statement. U.S. National Park Service, Denver, CO: Denver Service Center.
55. 1. Ortega-Alvarez R.,
    2. Lindig-Cisneros R.

    2012. Feathering the scene: The effects of ecological restoration on birds and the role birds play in evaluating restoration outcomes. Restoration Ecology 30:116–127.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
56. 1. Pacific Meridian Resources

    . 1996. Vegetation landform database development—final report submitted to National Park Service, Pacific Northwest Region. Pacific Meridian Resources, Portland, OR.
57. 1. Peters P.C.,
    2. Herrick J.E.,
    3. Urban D.L.,
    4. Gardner R.H.,
    5. Breshears D.D.

    2004. Strategies for ecological extrapolation. Oikos 106:627–636.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
58. 1. Poff N.L.,
    2. Olden J.D.,
    3. Merritt D.M.,
    4. Pepin D.M.

    2007. Homogenization of regional river dynamics by dams and global biodiversity implications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104:5732–5737.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
59. 1. Pohl M.

    2004. Channel bed mobility downstream from the Elwha Dams, Washington. Professional Geographer 56:422–431.

    OpenUrlGeoRefWeb of Science
60. 1. Robinson G.R.,
    2. Handel S.N.

    1993. Forest restoration on a closed landfill: Rapid addition of new species by bird dispersal. Conservation Biology 7:271–278.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
61. 1. Robinson G.R.,
    2. Handel S.N.

    2000. Directing spatial patterns of recruitment during an experimental urban woodland reclamation. Ecological Applications 10:174–188.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
62. 1. Rood S.B.,
    2. Mahoney J.M.

    2000. Revised stream flow regulation enables cottonwood recruitment along the St. Mary River, Alberta, Canada. Rivers 7:1591–1597.

    OpenUrl
63. 1. Royle J.A.,
    2. Dawson D.K.,
    3. Bates S.

    2004. Modeling abundance effects in distance sampling. Ecology 85:1591–1597.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
64. 1. Russell R.E.,
    2. Royle J.A.,
    3. Saab V.A.,
    4. Lehmkuhl J.F.,
    5. Block W.M.,
    6. Sauer J.R.

    2009. Modeling effects of environmental disturbance on wildlife communities: Avian responses to prescribed fire. Ecological Applications 19:1253–1263.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
65. 1. Saab V.

    1999. Importance of spatial scale to habitat use by breeding birds in riparian forests: A hierarchical analysis. Ecological Applications 9:135–151.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
66. 1. Schmidt J.C.,
    2. Graf J.B.

    1990. Aggradation and degradation of alluvial sand deposits, 1965 to 1986, Colorado River, Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1493.
67. 1. Scott M.L.,
    2. Skagen S.K.,
    3. Mergliano M.F.

    2003. Relating geomorphic change and grazing to avian communities in riparian forests. Conservation Biology 17:284–296.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
68. 1. Seoane J.,
    2. Carrascal L.M.,
    3. Alonso C.L.,
    4. Palomino D.

    2005. Speciesspecific traits associated to prediction errors in bird habitat suitability modeling. Ecological Modeling 185:299–308.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
69. 1. Shafroth P.B.,
    2. Friedman J.M.,
    3. Auble G.T.,
    4. Scott M.L.,
    5. Braatne J.H.

    2002. Potential responses of riparian vegetation to dam removal. Bioscience 52:703–712.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
70. 1. Siegel R.B.,
    2. Wilkerson R.L.,
    3. Hall S.

    2004. Landbird inventory for Olympic National Park final report. Point Reyes Station, CA: The Institute for Bird Populations.
71. 1. Small S.L,
    2. Thompson F.R. III.,
    3. Geupel G.R.,
    4. Faaborg J.

    2007. Spotted towhee population dynamics in a riparian restoration context. Condor 109:721–733.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
72. 1. Smith T.A.,
    2. Osmond D.L.,
    3. Moorman C.E.,
    4. Stucky J.M.,
    5. Gilliam J.W.,
    6. Wendell J.

    2008. Effect of vegetation management on bird habitat in riparian buffer zones. Southeastern Naturalist 7:277–288.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
73. 1. Stralberg D.,
    2. Herzog M.,
    3. Warnock N.,
    4. Nur N.,
    5. Valdez S.

    2006. Habitat-based modeling of wetland bird communities: An evaluation of potential restoration alternatives for South San Francisco Bay. Draft Final Report to California Coastal Conservancy. Petaluma, CA: PRBO Conservation Science. http://www.prbo.org/refs/files/11819_Stralberg2006.pdf
74. 1. Stralberg D.,
    2. Applegate D.L.,
    3. Phillips S.J.,
    4. Herzog M.P.,
    5. Nur N.,
    6. Warnock N.

    2009. Optimizing wetland restoration and management for avian communities using a mixed integer programming approach. Biological Conservation 142:94–109.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
75. 1. Stromberg J.C.

    2001. Restoration of riparian vegetation in the southwestern United States: Importance of flow regimes and fluvial dynamism. Journal of Arid Environments 49:17–34.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
76. 1. Thomas L,
    2. Laake J.L.,
    3. Strindberg S.,
    4. Marques F.F.C.,
    5. Buckland S.T.,
    6. Borchers D.L.,
    7. Anderson D.R.,
    8. Burnham K.P.,
    9. Hedley S.L.,
    10. Pollard J.H.

    2006. Distance 5.0, Release 2. Research Unit for Wildlife Populations Assessment, University of St. Andrews, UK. www.ruwpa.st-and.ac.uk/distance/
77. 1. Topping D.J.,
    2. Rubin D.M.,
    3. Nelson J.M.,
    4. Kinzel P.J. III.,
    5. Courson I.C.

    2000. Colorado River sediment transport 1: Natural sediment supply limitation and the influence of Glen Canyon Dam. Water Resources Research 36: 515–542.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
78. 1. Uriarte M.,
    2. Anciaes M.,
    3. da Silva M.T.B.,
    4. Rubim P.,
    5. Johnson E.,
    6. Bruna E.M.

    2011. Disentangling the drivers of reduced long-distance seed dispersal by birds in an experimentally fragmented landscape. Ecology 92:924–937.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
79. 1. Van Pelt R.,
    2. O’Keefe T.C.,
    3. Latterell J.J.,
    4. Naiman R.J.

    2006. Riparian forest stand development along the Queets River in Olympic National Park, Washington. Ecological Monographs 76: 277–298.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
80. 1. Vernier L.A.,
    2. Pearce J.L.

    2005. Boreal bird community response to jack pine forest succession. Forest Ecology and Management 217:19–36.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
81. 1. Wang B.C.,
    2. Smith T.B.

    2002. Closing the seed dispersal loop. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:379–385.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
82. 1. Willson M.F.

    1974. Avian community organization and habitat structure. Ecology 55:1017–1029.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
83. 1. Winter B.D.,
    2. Crain P.

    2008. Making the case for ecosystem restoration by dam removal in the Elwha River, Washington. Northwest Science 82:13–28.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
84. 1. Woodward A.,
    2. Schreiner E.G.,
    3. Crain P.,
    4. Brenkman S.J.,
    5. Happe P.J.,
    6. Acker S.A.,
    7. Hawkins-Hoffman C.

    2008. Conceptual models for research and monitoring of Elwha dam removal-management perspective. Northwest Science 82:59–71.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
85. 1. World Commission on Dams

    . 2000. Dams and Development. London: Earthscan Publications. www.dams.org/report/