Connectivity Restoration in Large Landscapes: Modeling Landscape Condition and Ecological Flows

References

1. 1. Baldwin R.F.,
   2. Perkl R.M.,
   3. Trombulak S.C.,
   4. Burwell W.B.I.

   2010. Modeling ecoregional connectivity. Pages 349–367 in Trombulak S. C., Baldwin R. F. (eds), Landscape-scale Conservation Planning. New York: Springer.
2. 1. Beier P.,
   2. Brost B.

   2010. Use of land facets to plan for climate change: conserving the arenas, not the actors. Conservation Biology 24:701–710.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 1. Beier P.,
   2. Spencer W.D.,
   3. Baldwin R.F.,
   4. McRae B.H.

   2011. Toward best practices for developing regional connectivity maps. Conservation Biology 25:879–892.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 1. Carroll C.,
   2. McRae B.H.,
   3. Brookes A.

   2011. Use of linkage mapping and centrality analysis across habitat gradients to conserve connectivity of gray wolf populations in Western North America. Conservation Biology 26:78–87.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
5. 1. Carroll C.,
   2. Phillips M.K.,
   3. Schumaker N.H.,
   4. Smith D.W.

   2003. Impacts of landscape change on wolf restoration success: planning a reintroduction using dynamic spatial models. Conservation Biology 17:536–548.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. 1. Compton B.W.,
   2. McGarigal K.,
   3. Cushman S.A.,
   4. Gamble L.

   2007. A resistant-kernel model of connectivity for amphibians that breed in vernal pools. Conservation Biology 21:788–799.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 1. Crooks K.R.,
   2. Sanjayan M.

   2006. Connectivity Conservation. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
8. 1. Cushman S.A.,
   2. McKelvey K.,
   3. Hayden J.,
   4. Schwartz M.

   2006. Gene flow in complex landscapes: testing multiple hypotheses with causal modeling. The American Naturalist 168:486–489.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 1. Davis M.A.,
   2. Chew M. K.,
   3. Hobbs R.J.,
   4. Lugo A.E.,
   5. Ewel J.J.,
   6. Vermeij G.J.,
   7. Brown J.H.,
   8. Rosenzweig M.L.,
   9. Gardener M.R.,
   10. Carroll S.P.,
   11. Thompson K.,
   12. Pickett S.T.A.,
   13. Stromberg J.C.,
   14. Tredici P.D.,
   15. Suding K.N.,
   16. Ehrenfeld J.,
   17. Grime J.P.,
   18. Mascaro J.,
   19. Briggs J.C.

   2011. Don’t judge species by their origins. Science 474:153–154.

   OpenUrl
10. 1. Dobson A.,
    2. Ralls K.,
    3. Foster M.S.,
    4. Soulé M.E.,
    5. Simberloff D,
    6. Doak D.,
    7. Estes J.A.,
    8. Mills L.S.,
    9. Mattson D,
    10. Dirzo R,
    11. Arita H,
    12. Ryan S,
    13. Norse E.A.,
    14. Noss R.F.,
    15. Johns D.

    1999. Connectivity: maintaining flows in fragmented landscapes. in Soulé M.E., Terborgh J. (eds), Continental Conservation: Scientific Foundations of Regional Reserve Networks. Washington D.C.: Island Press.
11. 1. Dobson A.P.,
    2. Bradshaw A.D.,
    3. Baker A.J.M.

    1997. Hopes for the future: restoration ecology and conservation biology. Science 277:515–522.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
12. 1. Donald P.F.,
    2. Evans A.D.

    2006. Habitat connectivity and matrix restoration: the wider implications of agrienvironment schemes. Journal of Applied Ecology 43:209–218.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. 1. Fahrig L.,
    2. Rytwinski T.

    2009. Effects of roads on animal abundance: an empirical review and synthesis. Ecology and Society 13:21.

    OpenUrl
14. 1. Haddad N.M.,
    2. Tewksbury J.J.

    2006. Impacts of corridors on populations and communities. Pages 390–415 in Crooks K.R., Sanjayan M. (eds), Connectivity Conservation. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
15. 1. Hannah L.,
    2. Midgley G.F.,
    3. Lovejoy T.,
    4. Bond W.J.,
    5. Bush M.,
    6. Lovett J.C.,
    7. Scott D.,
    8. Woodward F.I.

    2002. Conservation of biodiversity in a changing climate. Conservation Biology 16:264–268.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. 1. Hanski I.

    1997. Predictive and practical metapopulation models: the incidence function approach. Pages 21–45 in Tilman D., Kareiva P. (eds), Spatial Ecology: the Role of Space in Population Dynamics and Interspecific Interactions. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
17. 1. Harrison D.J.

    1992. Dispersal characteristics of juvenile coyotes in Maine. Journal of Wildlife Management 56:128–138.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. 1. Heller N.E.,
    2. Zavaleta E.S.

    2009. Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: a review of 22 years of recommendations. Biological Conservation 142:14–32.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. 1. Huxel G.R.,
    2. Hastings A.

    1999. Habitat loss, fragmentation, and restoration. Restoration Ecology 7:309–315.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. 1. Landguth E.L.,
    2. Hand B.K.,
    3. Glassy J.,
    4. Cushman S.A.,
    5. Sawaya M.A.

    2011. UNICOR: a species connectivity and corridor network simulator. Ecography 35:9–14.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
21. 1. McRae B.H.,
    2. Beier P.

    2007. Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations. PNAS 104:19885–19890.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
22. 1. McRae B.H.,
    2. Dickson B.G.,
    3. Keitt T.H.,
    4. Shah V.B.

    2008. Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. Ecology 89:2712–2724.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 1. Merriam G.

    1984. Connectivity: a fundamental ecological characteristic of landcape pattern. in Ruzicka M., Hrnciarova T., Miklos L. (eds), Proceedings of the First International Seminar on Methodology in Landscape Ecological Research and Planning. Roskilde, Denmark: IALE.
24. 1. Noss R.F.

    1983. A regional landscape approach to maintain diversity. Bioscience 33:700–706.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. 1. Noss R.F.

    1991. Wilderness recovery: thinking big in restoration ecology. Environmental Professional 13:225–234.

    OpenUrl
26. 1. Noss R.F.,
    2. Beier P.,
    3. Covington W.W.,
    4. Grumbine R.E.,
    5. Lindenmayer D.B.,
    6. Prather J.W.,
    7. Schmiegelow F.,
    8. Sisk T.D.,
    9. Vosick D.J.

    2006. Recommendations for integrating restoration ecology and conservation biology in Pondersa pine forests in the Southwestern United States. Restoration Ecology 14:4–10.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
27. 1. Nunez T.

    2011. Connectivity planning to facilitate species movements in response to climate change. Seattle, WA: University of Washington.
28. 1. Rouget M.,
    2. Cowling R.M.,
    3. Lombard A.T.,
    4. Knight A.T.,
    5. Kerley G.I.H.

    2006. Designing large-scale conservation corridors for pattern and process. Conservation Biology 20:549–561.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 1. Sanderson E.W.,
    2. Jaiteh M.,
    3. Levy M.A.,
    4. Redford K.H.,
    5. Wannebo A.V.,
    6. Woolmer G.

    2002. The human footprint and the last of the wild. Bioscience 52:891–904.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. 1. Semlitsch R.D.,
    2. Bodie J.R.

    2003. Biological criteria for buffer zones around wetlands and riparian habitats for amphibians and reptiles. Conservation Biology 17:1219–1228.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
31. 1. Singleton P.H.,
    2. Gaines W.L.,
    3. Lehmkuhl J.F.

    2002. Landscape permeability for large carnivores in Washington: a geographic information system weighted-distance and least-cost corridor assessment. Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station.
32. 1. Theobald D.M.

    2010. Estimating natural landscape changes from 1992 to 2030 in the conterminous US. Landscape Ecology 25:999–1011.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. 1. Theobald D.M.,
    2. Reed S.E.,
    3. Fields K.,
    4. Soulé M.E.

    2012. Connecting natural landscapes using a landscape permeability model to prioritize conservation activities in the United States. Conservation Letters 5:122–133.

    OpenUrl
34. 1. Tracey J.A.

    2006. Individual-based modeling as a tool for conserving connectivity. in Crooks K. R., Sanjayan M. A. (eds), Connectivity Conservation. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
35. 1. WHCWG

    . 2010. Washington Connected Landscapes Project: Statewide Analysis. Olympia, WA: Washington Departments of Fish and Wildlife, and Transportation.
36. 1. WHCWG

    . 2011. Washington Connected Landscapes Project: Climate-Gradient Corridors Report. Washington Departments of Fish and Wildlife, and Transportation.
37. 1. White P.S.,
    2. Walker J.L.

    1997. Approximating nature’s variation: selecting and using reference information in restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 5:338–349.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
38. 1. Woolmer G.,
    2. Trombulak S.C.,
    3. Ray J.C.,
    4. Doran P.J.,
    5. Anderson M.G.,
    6. Baldwin R.F.,
    7. Morgan A.,
    8. Sanderson E.W.

    2008. Rescaling the human footprint: a tool for conservation planning at an ecoregional scale. Landscape and Urban Planning 87:42–53.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science