Resolution of Sweet Flag Species Identity Provides Basis for Managing Contrasting Impacts of Native and Introduced Sweet Flag in North American Ecosystems

References

1. 1. Andreas B.K.,
   2. Mack J.J.,
   3. McCormac J.S.

   2004. Floristic quality assessment index (FQAI) for vascular plants and mosses for the State of Ohio. Columbus: Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Division of Surface Water, Wetland Ecology Group.
2. 1. Gilmore M.R.

   1931. Dispersal by Indians a factor in the extension of discontinuous distribution of certain species of native plants. Michigan Academy of Science 13:89–94.

   OpenUrl
3. 1. Gleason H.A.,
   2. Cronquist A.

   1991. Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada, 2nd ed. New York: The New York Botanical Garden.
4. 1. Les D.H.,
   2. Mehrhoff L.J.

   1999. Introduction of nonindigenous aquatic vascular plants in southern New England: a historical perspective. Biological Invasions 1:281–300.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
5. 1. Packer J.G.,
   2. Ringius G.S.

   1984. The distribution and status of Acorus (Araceae) in Canada. Canadian Journal of Botany 62:2248–2252.

   OpenUrl
6. 1. Pai A.,
   2. McCarthy B.C.

   2010. Suitability of the medicinal plant, Acorus calamus L., for wetland restoration. Natural Areas Journal 30:380–386.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
7. 1. Skibo A.Z.

   2006. Planting for a livable Delaware. Delaware: Delaware Invasive Species Counsel.
8. 1. Thompson S.A.

   1995. Systematics and biology of the Araceae and Acoraceae (Sweet-Flag Family) in temperate North America. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois.
9. 1. Thompson S.A.

   2000. Acoraceae Pages 124–127 in Flora of North America Editorial Committee (eds), Flora of North America Volume 22. New York: Oxford University Press.