Ecological Beauty, In the Eye of the Beholder

References

1. 1. Buchmann S.L.,
   2. Nabhan G.P.

   1997. The Forgotten Pollinators. Washington DC: Island Press.
2. 1. Daily G. C.

   (ed). 1997. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington DC: Island Press.
3. 1. Daily G.C.,
   2. Alexander S.,
   3. Ehrlich P.R.,
   4. Goulder L.,
   5. Lubchenco J.,
   6. Matson P.A.,
   7. Mooney H.A.,
   8. Postel S.,
   9. Schneider S.H.,
   10. Tilman D.,
   11. Woodwell G.M.

   1997. Ecosystem services: benefits supplied to human societies by natural ecosystems. Ecological Society of America, Issues in Ecology, Number 2. www.esa.org/science_resources/issues/FileEnglish/issue2.pdf.
4. 1. Dearborn D.C.,
   2. Kark S.

   2009. Motivations for conserving urban biodiversity. Conservation Biology 24:432–440.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
5. 1. Kareiva P.,
   2. Tallis H.,
   3. Ricketts T.H.,
   4. Daily G.C.,
   5. Polasky S.

   (eds). 2011. Natural Capital: Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
6. 1. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment

   . 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: General Synthesis. Washington DC: Island Press.
7. 1. Naeem S.,
   2. Bunker D.E.,
   3. Hector A.,
   4. Loreau M.,
   5. Perrings C.

   2009. Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning and Human Wellbeing: An Ecological and Economic Perspective. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.
8. 1. Steiner F.

   2011. Ecosystem services—learning to leverage natural capital. ArcNews 33:4–5.

   OpenUrl
9. 1. TEEB

   . 2010. Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB. www.teebweb.org/TEEBSynthesisReport/tabid/29410/Default.aspx.