Converting Riparian Restoration Waste to Energy: Testing Tamarisk (Tamarix spp.) Woody Biomass as Fuel for Downdraft Gasification

References

1. 1. Bateman H.L.,
   2. Paxton E.H.

   2010. Saltcedar and Russian olive interactions with wildlife. Pages 49–63 in Shafroth P.B., Brown C.A., Merritt D.M. (eds), Saltcedar and Russian Olive Control Demonstration Act science assessment. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009–5247.
2. 1. Bean D.

   2010. Personal communication on August 23. Colorado Department of Agriculture, Biological Pest Control Program, Program Administrator and Insectary Manager.
3. 1. Bilek E.M.,
   2. Skog K.E.,
   3. Fried J.,
   4. Christensen G.

   2005. Fuel to burn: economics of converting forest thinnings to energy using BioMax in southern Oregon. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-GTR-157. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory.
4. 1. Birken A.S.,
   2. Cooper D.J.

   2006. Processes of Tamarix invasion and floodplain development along the lower Green River, Utah. Ecological Applications 16:1103–1120.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 1. Briggs M.K.

   1996. Riparian Ecosystem Recovery in Arid Lands, Strategies and References. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.
6. 1. Clemons C.M,
   2. Stark N.M.

   2009. Feasibility of using saltcedar as a filler in injection-molded polyethylene composites. Wood and Fiber Science 41:2–12.

   OpenUrl
7. 1. Community Power Corporation

   . 2009. FAQs: What is a BioMax®? www.gocpc.com/faq.html.
8. 1. Di Tomaso J.M.

   1998. Impact, biology, and ecology of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) in the southwestern United States. Weed Technology 12:326–336.

   OpenUrlWeb of Science
9. 1. Dykstra D.P.

   2010. Extraction and utilization of saltcedar and Russian olive biomass. Pages 105–116 in Shafroth P.B., Brown C.A., Merritt D.M. (eds), Saltcedar and Russian Olive Control Demonstration Act science assessment. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009–5247.
10. 1. ECN

    , 2011. Energy Research Center of the Netherlands. www.ecn.nl/phyllis.
11. 1. Energy Information Administration

    . 1998. Challenges of electric power industry restructuring for fuel suppliers. Department of Energy Report DOE/EIA-0623. www.eia.doe.gov/pub/electricity/chg_str_fuel.pdf.
12. 1. Ellis L.M.

    2001. Short-term response of woody plants to fire in a Rio Grande riparian forest, central New Mexico, USA. Biological Conservation 97:159–170.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. 1. Gaskin J.F.,
    2. Kazmer D.J.

    2009. Introgression between invasive saltcedars (Tamarix chinensis and T. ramosissima) in the USA. Biological Invasions 11:1121–1130.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. 1. Gerry E

    . 1954. Athel Tamarisk Tamarix aphylla (L.) Karst. (= T. articulata Vahl.) Family: Tamaricaceae. U.S. Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, information leaflet, Foreign Woods Series Report 1986. Madison, WI.
15. 1. Glenn E.P.,
    2. Nagler P.L.

    2005. Comparative ecophysiology of Tamarix ramosissima and native trees in western U.S. riparian zones. Journal of Arid Environments 61:419–446.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. 1. Higgs T

    . 2011. Personal communication on April 28. Grand County Utah Weed Department, County Weed Control Supervisor.
17. 1. Morris G.

    1999. The value of the benefits of U.S. biomass power. NREL/SR57027541. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. www.nrel.gov/docs/fy00osti/27541.pdf.
18. 1. Next Earth Foundation

    . 2007. A pilot project for incorporating economic-benefit models into riparian restoration: creating jobs via alternative uses for tamarisk in the Lower Colorado River Region. A preliminary report prepared for Working for Rivers Foundation, Flagstaff AZ.
19. 1. O’Meara S.,
    2. Larsen D.,
    3. Owens C.

    2010. Methods to control saltcedar and Russian olive. Pages 65–102 in Shafroth P.B., Brown C.A., Merritt D.M. (eds), Saltcedar and Russian Olive Control Demonstration Act science assessment. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009–5247.
20. 1. Shafroth P.,
    2. Beauchamp V.,
    3. Briggs M.,
    4. Lair K.,
    5. Scott M.,
    6. Sher A.

    2008. Planning riparian restoration in the context of tamarix control in western North America. Restoration Ecology 16:97–112.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
21. 1. Sher A.,
    2. Lair K.,
    3. DePrenger-Levin M.,
    4. Dohrenwend K.

    2010. Best management practices for revegetation after tamarisk removal in the upper Colorado River basin. Colorado: Denver Botanic Gardens.
22. 1. Sustainable Communities

    . 2006. Chart of charcoal test results, May 2006 update. Zero Emissions Research & Initiatives, New Mexico. www.scizerinm.org/ZERI/_PDF/chartfinalmad.pdf.
23. 1. Tamarisk Coalition

    . 2009. Colorado River Basin tamarisk and Russian olive assessment. Prepared for the Central Arizona Water Conservation District, Colorado Water Conservation Board, New Mexico Interstate Stream Commission, Six Agency Committee, Southern Nevada Water Authority, Utah Division of Water Resources, and Wyoming State Engineer’s Office. http://tamariskcoalition.org/ColoradoRiver.html.
24. 1. Tracy J.L.,
    2. Di Luzio M.,
    3. DeLoach C.J.

    2009. Ecoclimatic species distribution models of tamarisk beetles (Diorhabda elongata species group) and invasive tamarisks (Tamarix spp.) with a novel stacked environmental envelope model (SEEM). Abstract in 2009 Tamarisk and Russian Olive Research Conference. Reno, NV: Tamarisk Coalition and Colorado State University. www.coopext.colostate.edu/TRA/PLANTS/weeds/Tamarisk_2009.shtml
25. 1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

    . 2009. Hazardous waste characteristics: a user-friendly reference document. www.epa.gov/osw/hazard/wastetypes/wasteid/char/hw-char.pdf.
26. 1. Electronic Code of Federal Regulations

    . 2010. 40 CFR, part 261.24 (b), Table 1, Maximum Concentration of Contaminants for the Toxicity Characteristic. http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&rgn=div8&view=text&node=40:25.0.1.1.2.3.1.5&idno=40.
27. 1. U.S. Department of Agriculture

    . 2010. Plant Protection and Quarantine. USDA APHIS PPQ Moratorium for Biological Control of Saltcedar (Tamarix species) using the Biological Control Agent Diorhabda Species (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Issued June 15. Print.
28. 1. Zavaleta E.

    2000. The Economic Value of Controlling an Invasive Shrub. Ambio 29:462–467.

    OpenUrl
29. 1. Zouhar K.

    2003. Tamarix spp. In Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory. www.fs.fed.us/database/feis.