Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Ecological Restoration
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Ecological Restoration

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleArticles

Combining Available Spatial Data to Define Restoration Goals

Rosaleen G. March and Elizabeth H. Smith
Ecological Restoration, September 2011, 29 (3) 252-260; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/er.29.3.252
Rosaleen G. March
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth H. Smith
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

    1. Anderson J.R.,
    2. Hardy E.E.,
    3. Roach J.T.,
    4. Witmer R.E.
    1976. A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. Geological Survey Professional Paper 964, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
    1. Aransas County Appraisal District
    . 2008. County Taxing Units. www.aransascad.org/Appraisal/PublicAccess/TaxingUnitListing.aspx?SelectedItem=6&PropertyID=&PropertyOwnerID=&NodeID=11.
    1. Brown L.F.,
    2. Evans T.J.,
    3. Fisher W.L.,
    4. Groat C.G.,
    5. McGowen J.H.,
    6. Proctor C.V.
    1976. Environmental geologic atlas of the Texas coastal zone: Port Lavaca area. Austin: Bureau of Economic Geology, Univ. Tex. Austin.
    1. Defries R.S.,
    2. Townshend J.R.G.
    1994. NDVI-derived land cover classifications at a global scale. International Journal of Remote Sensing 15:3567–3586.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Egan D,
    2. Howell E.A.
    , eds. 2001. The Historical Ecology Handbook: A Restorationist’s Guide to Reference Ecosystems. Washington DC: Island Press.
    1. Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI)
    . 2009. ArcGIS. Version 9.3.1. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.
    1. Gesch D.B.
    2007. The National Elevation Dataset. Pages 99–118 in Maune D. (ed), Digital elevation model technologies and applications: the DEM users manual, 2nd edition. Bethesda: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.
    1. Gesch D.,
    2. Oimoen M.,
    3. Greenlee S.,
    4. Nelson C.,
    5. Steuck M.,
    6. Tyler D.
    2002. The National Elevation Dataset. Photogrammetric engineering and remote sensing 68:5–11.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
    1. Global Land Cover Facility (GLCF)
    . 2009. Landsat Imagery. www.landcover.org/data/landsat/
    1. Grossman D.H.,
    2. Faber-Langendoen D.,
    3. Weakley A.S.,
    4. Anderson M.,
    5. Bourgeron P.,
    6. Crawford R.,
    7. Goodin K.,
    8. Landaal S.,
    9. Metzler K.,
    10. Patterson K.,
    11. Pyne M.,
    12. Reid M.,
    13. Sneddon L.
    1998. International classification of ecological communities: terrestrial vegetation of the United States. Volume 1. The national vegetation classification system: development, status, and applications. Arlington VA: The Nature Conservancy.
    1. Guckian W.J.,
    2. Garcia R.N.
    1979. Soil Survey of San Patricio and Aransas Counties, Texas. National Cooperative Soil Survey, College Station.
    1. Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS)
    . 2010. http://www.itis.gov/
    1. Natural Resources Conservation Service
    . 2009. Soil survey of San Patricio and Aransas Counties, Texas. United States Department of Agriculture. http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov.
    1. NOAA Coastal Services Center
    . 2008. Gulf Coast Land Cover. www.csc.noaa.gov/crs/lca/gulfcoast.html.
    1. Texas Natural Resource Inventory System
    . 2008. Texas Natural Resources Information System home page. www.tnris.state.tx.us/.
    1. Zerbe S.
    1998. Potential natural vegetation: validity and applicability in landscape planning and nature conservation. Applied Vegetation Science 1:165–172.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ecological Restoration: 29 (3)
Ecological Restoration
Vol. 29, Issue 3
1 Sep 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ecological Restoration.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Combining Available Spatial Data to Define Restoration Goals
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ecological Restoration
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ecological Restoration web site.
Citation Tools
Combining Available Spatial Data to Define Restoration Goals
Rosaleen G. March, Elizabeth H. Smith
Ecological Restoration Sep 2011, 29 (3) 252-260; DOI: 10.3368/er.29.3.252

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Combining Available Spatial Data to Define Restoration Goals
Rosaleen G. March, Elizabeth H. Smith
Ecological Restoration Sep 2011, 29 (3) 252-260; DOI: 10.3368/er.29.3.252
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Choosing Plant Diversity Metrics: A Tallgrass Prairie Case Study
  • A Conceptual Planning Framework to Improve Integration of Reclamation with Site Remediation
  • Genetic Diversity, Mating System, and Reproductive Output of Restored Melaleuca acuminata Populations are Comparable to Natural Remnant Populations
Show more Articles

Research Article

  • Effects of Restoration on Small Headwater Stream Quality
  • Container Type but not Substrate or Hydrogel affects Establishment of Sandhill Milkweed (Asclepias humistrata)
  • Natural Regeneration Dynamics of Himalayan Forests
Show more Research Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • ecological sites
  • elevation model
  • land use/land cover
  • potential natural vegetation
  • Texas Coastal Bend
UW Press logo

© 2025 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire