Testing the Microclimatic Habitat Design Framework in Abandoned Sand and Gravel Extraction Sites Using the Karner Blue Butterfly

References

1. 1. Baker R.H.A.,
   2. Sansford C.E.,
   3. Jarvis C.H.,
   4. Cannon R.J.C.,
   5. MacLeod A.,
   6. Walters K.F.A.

   2000. The role of climatic mapping in predicting the potential geographic distribution of non-indigenous pests under current and future climates. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 82:57–71.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. 1. Banks S.,
   2. Skilleter G.A.

   2007. The importance of incorporating fine-scale habitat data into the design of an intertidal marine reserve system. Biological Conservation 138:13–29.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Benes J.,
   2. Kepka P.,
   3. Konvicka M.

   2003. Limestone quarries as refuges for European xerophilous butterflies. Conservation Biology 17:1058–1069.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. 1. Boyonoski A.M.

   1992. Factors affecting the establishment and maintenance of Lupinus perennis (wild lupine). MSc thesis, University of Guelph, Canada.
5. 1. Brooker L.

   2002. The application of focal species knowledge to landscape design in agricultural lands using the ecological neighbourhood as a template. Landscape and Urban Planning 60:185–210.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. 1. Brown D.M.,
   2. McKay G.A.,
   3. Chapman L.J.

   1980. The Climate of Southern Ontario. Environment Canada Atmospheric Environment Services Climatological Studies Number 5. Toronto, ON: Environment Canada.
7. 1. Campbell C.A.,
   2. Coulson D.P.,
   3. Bryant A.A.

   1990. Status, distribution, and life history characteristics of some butterflies at risk in the Carolinian Forest Zone of Ontario. Pages 207–246 in Allen G.M., Eagles P.F.J., Price S.D. (eds), Conserving Carolinian Canada. Waterloo ON: University of Waterloo Press.
8. 1. Campbell G.S.,
   2. Norman J.M.

   1998. An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics. New York: Springer.
9. 1. Chan P.K.,
   2. Laurence P.

   2006. Assessment of potential Karner blue butterfly (Lycaeides melissa samuelis) (Family: Lycanidae) reintroduction sites in Ontario Canada. Restoration Ecology 14: 645–652.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. 1. Chapman L.J.,
    2. Putnam D.F.

    1984. The Physiography of Southern Ontario. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources.
11. 1. Chen J.,
    2. Franklin J.F.,
    3. Lowe S.J.

    1996. Comparison of abiotic and structurally defined patch patterns in a hypothetical forest landscape. Conservation Biology 10:854–862.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. 1. Clausen H.D.,
    2. Holbeck H.B.,
    3. Reddersen J.

    2001. Factors influencing abundance of butterflies and burnet moths in the uncultivated habitats of an organic farm in Denmark. Biological Conservation 98:167–178.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. 1. Coppolillo P.,
    2. Gomez H.,
    3. Maisels F.,
    4. Wallace R.

    2004. Selection criteria for suites of landscape species as a basis for site-based conservation. Biological Conservation 115:419–430.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. 1. Corry R.C.,
    2. Lafortezza R.,
    3. Brown R.D.,
    4. Kenny N.,
    5. Robertson P.J.

    2008. Using landscape context to guide ecological restoration: An approach for pits and quarries in Ontario. Ecological Restoration 26:120–127.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
15. 1. Dubayah R.,
    2. Van Katwijk E.

    1992. The topographic distribution of annual incoming solar radiation in the Rio Grande River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters 19:2231–2234.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. 1. Fraser J.,
    2. McBride R.A.

    2000. The utility of aggregate processing fines in the rehabilitation of dolomite quarries. Land Degradation and Development 11:1–17.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
17. 1. Gehlhausen S.M.,
    2. Schwartz M.W.,
    3. Augspurger C.K.

    2000. Vegetation and microclimatic edge effects in two mixed-mesophytic forest fragments. Plant Ecology 147:21–35.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. 1. Geiger R.,
    2. Aron R.H.,
    3. Todhunter P.

    2003. The Climate near the Ground. New York: Rowan and Littlefield Publishers.
19. 1. Grundel R.,
    2. Pavlovic N.B.

    2007. Resource availability, matrix quality, microclimate, and spatial pattern as predictors of patch use by the Karner blue butterfly. Biological Conservation 135:135–144.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. 1. Grundel R.,
    2. Pavlovic N.B.,
    3. Sulzman C.L.

    1998a. The effect of canopy cover and seasonal change on host plant quality for the endangered Karner blue butterfly (Lycaeides melissa samuelis). Oecologica 114:243–250.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
21. 1. Grundel R.,
    2. Pavlovic N.B.,
    3. Sulzman C.L.

    1998b. Habitat use by the endangered Karner blue butterfly in oak woodlands: The influence of canopy cover. Biological Conservation 85:47–53.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. 1. Heikkinen R.K.,
    2. Luoto M.,
    3. Kuussaari M.,
    4. Poyry J.

    2005. New insights into butterfly-environment relationships using partitioning methods. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 272:2203–2210.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
23. 1. Knutson R.L.,
    2. Kwilosz J.R.,
    3. Grundel R.

    1999. Movement patters and population characteristics of the Karner blue butterfly (Lycaeides melissa samuelis) at Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore. Natural Areas Journal 19:109–120.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
24. 1. Lafortezza R.,
    2. Brown R.D.

    2004. A framework for landscape ecological design of new patches in the rural landscape. Environmental Management 34:461–473.

    OpenUrlPubMed
25. 1. Lane C.P.,
    2. Andow D.A.

    2003. Oak savanna subhabitat variation and the population biology of Lycaeides melissa samuelis (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Ecology and Population Biology 96:799–809.

    OpenUrl
26. 1. Luoto M.,
    2. Kuussaari M.,
    3. Rita H.,
    4. Salminen J.,
    5. von Bonsdorff T.

    2001. Determinants of distribution and abundance in the clouded apollo butterfly: A landscape ecological approach. Ecography 24:601–617.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
27. 1. McCune B.,
    2. Keon D.

    2002. Equations for potential annual direct incident radiation and heat load. Journal of Vegetation Science 13:603–606.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. 1. Milgrom T.

    2008. Environmental aspects of abandoned quarries: Israel as a case study. Landscape and Urban Planning 87:172–179.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
29. 1. Oke T.R.

    1987. Boundary Layer Climates, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
30. 1. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (OMNR)

    . 2000. Significant Habitat Technical Guide. MNR#51438. Government of Ontario, Canada. www.mnr.gov.on.ca/stdprodconsume/groups/lr/@mnr/@fw/documents/document/mnr_e001285.pdf
31. 1. Packer L

    . 1990. The status of two butterflies, Karner blue (Lycaeides melissa samuelis) and Frosted Elfin (Incisalia irus), restricted to oak savannah in Ontario. Pages 253–271 in Allen G.M., Eagles P.F.J., Price S.D. (eds), Conserving Carolinian Canada. Waterloo, ON: University of Waterloo Press.
32. 1. Putnam D.F.,
    2. Chapman L.J.

    1938. The climate of southern Ontario. Scientific Agriculture 18:401–446.

    OpenUrl
33. 1. Quon S.P.,
    2. Martin L.R.G.,
    3. Murphy S.D.

    2001. Effective planning and implementation of rehabilitation projects: A case study of the regional municipality of Waterloo (Ontario, Canada). Environmental Management 27:421–433.

    OpenUrlPubMed
34. 1. Reis L.,
    2. Debinski M.

    2001. Butterfly responses to habitat edges in the highly fragmented prairies of Central Iowa. Journal of Animal Ecology 70:840–852.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
35. 1. Sheley R.L.,
    2. Mangold J.M.,
    3. Anderson J.L.

    2006. Potential for successional theory to guide restoration of invasive-plant-dominated rangeland. Ecological Monographs 76:365–379.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
36. 1. Smallidge P.J.,
    2. Leopold D.J.

    1997. Vegetation management for the maintenance and conservation of butterfly habitat in temperate human-dominated landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 38:259–280.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
37. 1. Thomas J.A.,
    2. Bourn N.A.D.,
    3. Clarke R.T.,
    4. Stewart K.E.,
    5. Simcox D.J.,
    6. Pearman G.S.,
    7. Curtis R.,
    8. Goodger B.

    2001. The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London B 268:1791–1796.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
38. 1. Warren M.S.

    1993a. A review of butterfly conservation in central southern Britain: I. Protection, evaluation and extinction on prime sites. Biological Conservation 64:25–35.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
39. 1. Warren M.S.

    1993b. A review of butterfly conservation in central southern Britain: II. Site management and habitat selection of key species. Biological Conservation 64:37–49.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
40. 1. Weiss S.B.,
    2. Murphy D.D.

    1990. Thermal microenvironments and the restoration of rare butterfly habitat. Pages 50–60 in Berger J.J. (ed), Environmental Restoration: Science and Strategies for Restoring the Earth. Washington DC: Island Press.
41. 1. Weiss S.B.,
    2. Murphy D.D.,
    3. Ehrlich P.R.,
    4. Metzler C.F.

    1993. Adult emergence phenology in checkerspot butterflies: The effects of macroclimate, topoclimate, and population history. Oecologia 96:261–270.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
42. 1. Weiss S.B.,
    2. Murphy D.D.,
    3. White R.R.

    1988. Sun, slope and butterflies: Topographic determinants of habitat quality for Euphydryas editha. Ecology 69:1486–1496.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
43. 1. Yokohari M.,
    2. Brown R.D.,
    3. Takeuchi K.

    1994. A framework for the conservation of rural ecological landscapes in the urban fringe area in Japan. Landscape and Urban Planning 29:103–116.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science