U.S. Wetland Protection and Restoration: Have We Made a Difference?

References

1. 1. Able K.W.,
   2. Hagan S.M.

   2003. Impact of common reed, Phragmites australis, on essential fish habitat: Influence on reproduction, embryological development and larval abundance of mummichog, Fundulus heteroclitus. Estuaries 26:40–50.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. 1. Brown S.C.,
   2. Bedford B.L.

   1997. Restoration of wetland vegetation with transplanted wetland soil: An experimental study. Wetlands 17:424–437.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
3. 1. Brown S.C.,
   2. Veneman P.L.M.

   2001. Effectiveness of compensatory wetland mitigation in Massachusetts, USA. Wetlands 21: 508–518.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. 1. Carson Rachel

   . 1962. Silent Spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
5. 1. Dahl T.E.

   2006. Status and trends of wetlands in the coterminous United States 1998 to 2004. , Washington DC: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
6. 1. Gore Al

   . 2006. An Inconvenient Truth. Emmaus PA: Rodale Press.
7. 1. Johnson P.A.,
   2. Mock D.L.,
   3. Teachout E.J.,
   4. McMillan A.

   2000. Washington State wetland mitigation evaluation study. Washington State Department of Ecology Publication No. 00-06-016.
8. 1. Kusler J.,
   2. Kentula M.

   1990. Wetland Creation and Restoration: The Status of the Science. Washington DC: Island Press.
9. 1. Mack J.J.,
   2. Micacchion M.

   2006. An ecological assessment of Ohio mitigation banks: Vegetation, amphibians, hydrology, and soils. Ohio EPA Technical Report WET/2006-1.
10. 1. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MDEP)

    . 2009. Massachusetts wetland change data base. www.mass.gov/mgis/wetchange.htm
11. 1. Mitsch W.J.,
    2. Gosselink J.G.

    2007. Wetlands, 4th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
12. 1. Mitsch W.J.,
    2. Wilson R.F.

    1996. Improving the success of wetland creation and restoration with know-how, time, and self-design. Ecological Applications 6:77–83.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. 1. National Research Council

    . 2001. Compensating for wetland losses under the Clean Water Act. Committee on Mitigating Wetland Losses, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Water Science and Technology Board, Division on Earth and Life Studies. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
14. 1. New York City Department of Environmental Protection (NYCDEP)

    . 2009. A review of the state of the bay. www.nyc.gov/html/dep/html/dep_projects/jamaica_bay_symposium_recap.shtml
15. 1. Robb J.T.

    2000. Indiana wetland compensatory mitigation: Inventory. Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Acquisition and Assistance Branch.
16. 1. San Francisco Estuary Project

    . 2009. San Francisco Bay Area wetlands restoration program. www.sfwetlands.ca.gov/
17. 1. Streever B

    . 2001. Saving Louisiana? The Battle for Coastal Wetlands. Jackson MS: University Press of Mississippi.
18. 1. Teal J.M.,
    2. Peterson S.B.

    2005. Introduction to the Delaware Bay salt marsh restoration. Ecological Engineering 25: 199–203.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. 1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)

    . 2001. Wetland restoration. www.epa.gov/owow/wetlands/pdf/restoration_pr.pdf
20. 1. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS)

    . 2009. National wetlands inventory. www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/index.html
21. 1. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS)

    . 2010. National wetlands inventory, wetlands mapper. www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Mapper.html
22. 1. Weis J.S.,
    2. Butler C.A.

    2009. Salt Marshes. Piscataway NJ: Rutgers University Press.