An Index of Cumulative Disturbance to River Fish Habitats of the Conterminous United States from Landscape Anthropogenic Activities

References

1. 1. Abell R.A.,
   2. Olson D.M.,
   3. Dinerstein E.,
   4. Hurley P.T.,
   5. Diggs J.T.,
   6. Eichbaum W.,
   7. Walters S.,
   8. Wettengel W.,
   9. Allnutt T.,
   10. Louks C.J.,
   11. Hedao P.

   2000. Freshwater Ecoregions of North America: A Conservation Assessment. Washington DCIsland Press.
2. 1. Alexander R.B.,
   2. Smith R.A.,
   3. Schwarz G.E.,
   4. Boyer E.W.,
   5. Nolan J.V.,
   6. Brakebill J.W.

   2008. Differences in phosphorus and nitrogen delivery to the gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi river basin. Environmental Science and Technology 42:822–830.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 1. Allan J.D.

   2004. Landscapes and riverscapes: The influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35:257–284.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. 1. Anderson M.J.,
   2. Gribble N.A.

   1998. Partitioning the variation among spatial, temporal and environmental components in a multivariate data set. Australian Journal of Ecology 23:158–167.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. 1. Angermeier P.L.,
   2. Karr J.R.

   1986. Applying an index of biotic integrity based on stream-fish communities: Considerations in sampling and interpretation. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 6:418–429.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. 1. Angermeier P.L.,
   2. Winston M.R.

   1999. Characterizing fish community diversity across Virginia landscapes: Prerequisite for conservation. Ecological Applications 9:335–349.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. 1. Bayley P.B.

   1995. Understanding larger river-floodplain ecosystems. Bioscience 45:153–158.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. 1. Borcard D.,
   2. Legendre P.,
   3. Drapeau P.

   1992. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73:1045–1055.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. 1. Boughton D.A.,
   2. Smith E.R.,
   3. O’Neill R.V.

   1999. Regional vulnerability: A conceptual framework. Ecosystem Health 5:312–322.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. 1. Brenden T.O.,
    2. Wang L.Z.,
    3. Su Z.M.

    2008. Quantitative identification of disturbance thresholds in support of aquatic resource management. Environmental Management 42:821–832.

    OpenUrlPubMed
11. 1. Danz N.P.,
    2. Niemi G.J.,
    3. Regal R.R.,
    4. Hollenhorst T.,
    5. Johnson L.B.,
    6. Hanowski J.M.,
    7. Axler R.P.,
    8. Ciborowski J.J.H.,
    9. Hrabik T.,
    10. Brady V.J.,
    11. Kelly J.R.,
    12. Morrice J.A.,
    13. Brazner J.C.,
    14. Howe R.W.,
    15. Johnston C.A.,
    16. Host G.E.

    2007. Integrated measures of anthropogenic stress in the US Great Lakes basin. Environmental Management 39:631–647.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
12. 1. Diefenderfer H.L.,
    2. Sobocinski K.L.,
    3. Thom R.M.,
    4. May C.W.,
    5. Borde A.B.,
    6. Southard S.L.,
    7. Vavrinec J.,
    8. Sather N.K.

    2009. Multiscale analysis of restoration priorities for marine shoreline planning. Environmental Management 44:712–731.

    OpenUrlPubMed
13. 1. Douvere F.,
    2. Ehler C.N.

    2009. New perspectives on sea use management: Initial findings from European experience with marine spatial planning. Journal of Environmental Management 90:77–88.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 1. Dudgeon D.,
    2. Arthington A.H.,
    3. Gessner M.O.,
    4. Kawabata Z.I.,
    5. Knowler D.J.,
    6. Leveque C.,
    7. Naiman R.J.,
    8. Prieur-Richard A.H.,
    9. Soto D.,
    10. Stiassny M.L.J.,
    11. Sullivan C.A.

    2006. Freshwater biodiversity: Importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological Reviews 81:163–182.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
15. 1. Emery E.B.,
    2. Simon T.P.,
    3. McCormick F.H.,
    4. Angermeier P.L.,
    5. Deshon J.E.,
    6. Yoder C.O.,
    7. Sanders R.E.,
    8. Pearson W.D.,
    9. Hickman G.D.,
    10. Reash R.J.,
    11. Thomas J.A.

    2003. Development of a multimetric index for assessing the biological condition of the Ohio River. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 132:791–808.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. 1. Fausch K.D.,
    2. Torgersen C.E.,
    3. Baxter C.V.,
    4. Li H.W.

    2002. Landscapes to riverscapes: Bridging the gap between research and conservation of stream fishes. Bioscience 52:483–498.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. 1. Fitzpatrick F.A.,
    2. Scudder B.C.,
    3. Lenz B.N.,
    4. Sullivan D.J.

    2001. Effects of multi-scale environmental characteristics on agricultural stream biota in eastern Wisconsin. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 37:1489–1507.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
18. 1. Frimpong E.A.,
    2. Angermeier P.L.

    2009. Fish traits: A database of ecological and life-history traits of freshwater fishes of the United States. Fisheries 34:487–495.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. 1. Frissell C.A.,
    2. Nawa R.K.

    1992. Incidence and causes of physical failure of artificial habitat structures in streams of western Oregon and Washington. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 12:182–197.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
20. 1. Gergel S.E.,
    2. Turner M.G.,
    3. Miller J.R.,
    4. Melack J.M.,
    5. Stanley E.H.

    2002. Landscape indicators of human impacts to riverine systems. Aquatic Sciences 64:118–128.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
21. 1. Gosselink J.G.,
    2. Shaffer G.P.,
    3. Lee L.C.,
    4. Burdick D.M.,
    5. Childers D.L.,
    6. Leibowitz N.C.,
    7. Hamilton S.C.,
    8. Boumans R.,
    9. Cushman D.,
    10. Fields S.,
    11. Koch M.,
    12. Visser J.M.

    1990. Landscape conservation in a forested wetland watershed: Can we manage cumulative impacts? Bioscience 40:588–600.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. 1. Griffith D.A.,
    2. Amrhein C.G.

    1997. Multivariate Statistical Analysis for Geographersdle River. Upper Sad NJ: Prentice Hall.
23. 1. Haan C.T.

    2002. Statistical Methods in Hydrology, 2nd ed. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
24. 1. Halliwell D.B.,
    2. Langdon R.W.,
    3. Daniels R.A.,
    4. Kurtenbach J.P.,
    5. Jacobson R.A.

    1999. Classification of freshwater fish species of the northeastern United States for use in the development of indices of biological integrity, with regional applications. Pages 301–333 in Simon T.P. (ed),Assessing the Sustainability and Biological Integrity of Water Resources Using Fish Communities. Boca Raton FL: CRC Press.
25. 1. Harding J.S.,
    2. Benfield E.F.,
    3. Bolstad P.V.,
    4. Helfman G.S.,
    5. Jones E.B.D.

    1998. Stream biodiversity: The ghost of land use past. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 95:14843–14847.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
26. 1. Hastie T.J.,
    2. Pregibon D.

    1993. Generalized linear models. Chapter 6 in Chambers J.M., Hastie T.J. (eds), Statistical Models. London: Chapman and Hall.
27. 1. Hayes D.B.,
    2. Ferreri C.P.,
    3. Taylor W.W.

    1996. Linking fish habitat to their population dynamics. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53:383–390.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. 1. Helfman G.S.

    2007. Fish Conservation: A Guide to Understanding and Restoring Global Aquatic Biodiversity and Fishery Resources. Washington DC: Island Press.
29. 1. Herlihy A.T.,
    2. Paulsen S.G.,
    3. Van Sickle J.,
    4. Stoddard J.L.,
    5. Hawkins C.P.,
    6. Yuan L.L.

    2008. Striving for consistency in a national assessment: The challenges of applying a reference-condition approach at a continental scale. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 27:860–877.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. 1. Hiddink J.G.,
    2. Kaiser M.J.

    2005. Implications of Liebig’s law of the minimum for the use of ecological indicators based on abundance. Ecography 28:264–271.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
31. 1. Higgins J.V.,
    2. Bryer M.T.,
    3. Khoury M.L.,
    4. Fitzhugh T.W.

    2005. A freshwater classification approach for biodiversity conservation planning. Conservation Biology 19:432–445.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. 1. Hitt N.P.,
    2. Angermeier P.L.

    2008. River-stream connectivity affects fish bioassessment performance. Environmental Management 42:132–150.

    OpenUrlPubMed
33. 1. Hunsaker C.T.,
    2. Graham R.L.,
    3. Suter G.W.,
    4. Oneill R.V.,
    5. Barnthouse L.W.,
    6. Gardner R.H.

    1990. Assessing ecological risk on a regional scale. Environmental Management 14:325–332.

    OpenUrl
34. 1. Jelks H.L.,
    2. Walsch S.J.,
    3. Burkhead N.,
    4. Contreras-Balderas S.,
    5. Diaz-Pardo E.,
    6. Hendrickson D.,
    7. Lyons J.,
    8. Mandrak N.,
    9. McCormick F.,
    10. Nelson J.,
    11. Platania S.,
    12. Porter B.,
    13. Renaud C.,
    14. Schmitter-Soto J.,
    15. Taylor E.,
    16. Warren M.

    2008. Conservation status of imperiled North American freshwater and diadromous fishes. Fisheries 33:372–386.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
35. 1. Karr J.R.

    1987. Biological monitoring and environmental assessment: A conceptual framework. Environmental Management 11:249–256.

    OpenUrl
36. 1. Karr J.R.,
    2. Chu E.W.

    1997. Biological Monitoring and Assessment: Using Multimetric Indexes Effectively. Seattle: University of Washington.
37. 1. Karr J.R.,
    2. Fausch K.D.,
    3. Angermeier P.L.,
    4. Yant P.R.,
    5. Schlosser I.J.

    1986. Assessing Biological Integrity in Running Waters: A Method and Its Rational. Champaign: Illinois Natural History Survey.
38. 1. King R.S.,
    2. Baker M.E.,
    3. Whigham D.F.,
    4. Weller D.E.,
    5. Jordan T.E.,
    6. Kazyak P.F.,
    7. Hurd M.K.

    2005. Spatial considerations for linking watershed land cover to ecological indicators in streams. Ecological Applications 15:137–153.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
39. 1. Lake P.S.

    2000. Disturbance, patchiness, and diversity in streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 19:573–592.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
40. 1. Legendre P.

    1993. Spatial autocorrelation: Trouble or new paradigm? Ecology 74:1659–1673.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
41. 1. Linam G.W.,
    2. Kleinsasser L.J.,
    3. Mayes K.B.

    2002. Regionalization of the index of biotic integrity for Texas streams. River Studies Report No. 17. Austin: Resource Protection Division, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department.
42. 1. Line D.E.,
    2. Harman W.A.,
    3. Jennings G.D.,
    4. Thompson E.J.,
    5. Osmond D.L.

    2000. Nonpoint-source pollutant load reductions associated with livestock exclusion. Journal of Environmental Quality 29:1882–1890.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
43. 1. Lyons J.

    1996. Patterns in the species composition of fish assemblages among Wisconsin streams. Environmental Biology of Fishes 45:329–341.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
44. 1. Lyons J.,
    2. Piette R.R.,
    3. Niermeyer K.W.

    2001. Development, validation, and application of a fish-based index of biotic integrity for Wisconsin’s large warmwater rivers. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 130:1077–1094.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
45. 1. Mattson K.M.,
    2. Angermeier P.L.

    2007. Integrating human impacts and ecological integrity into a risk-based protocol for conservation planning. Environmental Management 39:125–138.

    OpenUrlPubMed
46. 1. McCormick F.H.,
    2. Hughes R.M.,
    3. Kaufmann P.R.,
    4. Peck D.V.,
    5. Stoddard J.L.,
    6. Herlihy A.T.

    2001. Development of an index of biotic integrity for the Mid-Atlantic Highlands region. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 130:857–877.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
47. 1. Mebane C.A.,
    2. Maret T.R.,
    3. Hughes R.M.

    2003. An index of biological integrity (IBI) for Pacific Northwest rivers. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 132:239–261.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
48. 1. Metzeling L.,
    2. Doeg T.,
    3. O’Connor W.

    1995. The impact of salinization and sedimentation on aquatic biota. Pages 126–136 in Bradstock R.A., Auld T.D., Keith D.A., Kingsford R.T., Lunney D., Sivertsen D.P.(eds), Conserving Biodiversity: Threats and Solutions. Sydney, Australia: Surrey Beatty and Sons.
49. Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ). 2002. Great Lakes and environmental assessment section procedure #51. Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Surface Water Quality Division.
50. 1. Moss B.

    2000. Biodiversity in fresh waters: An issue of species preservation or system functioning? Environmental Conservation 27:1–4.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
51. 1. Moulton S.R.,
    2. Kennen J.G.,
    3. Goldstein R.M.,
    4. Hambrook J.A.

    2002. Revised protocols for sampling algal, invertebrate, and fish communities as part of the National Water-Quality Assessment Program. Reston VA: U.S. Geological Survey.
52. National Fish Habitat Action Plan (NFHAP). 2006. National fish habitat action plan. Washington DC: Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies.
53. National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 2010. Development sprawl impacts on the terrestrial carbon dynamics of the United States. Data download. www.ngdc.noaa.gov/dmsp/download_sprawl.html
54. 1. Norris R.H.,
    2. Linke S.,
    3. Prosser I.,
    4. Young W.J.,
    5. Liston P.,
    6. Bauer N.,
    7. Sloane N.,
    8. Dyer F.,
    9. Thoms M.

    2007. Very-broad-scale assessment of human impacts on river condition. Freshwater Biology 52:959–976.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
55. 1. Oberdorff T.,
    2. Hugueny B.,
    3. Guegan J.F.

    1997. Is there an influence of historical events on contemporary fish species richness in rivers? Comparisons between Western Europe and North America. Journal of Biogeography 24:461–467.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
56. 1. Odum E.P.,
    2. Finn J.T.,
    3. Franz E.H.

    1979. Perterbation theory and the subsidy-stress gradient. Bioscience 29:349–352.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
57. 1. Omernik J.M.

    1987. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77:118–125.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
58. 1. Opdam P.,
    2. Foppen R.,
    3. Vos C.

    2001. Bridging the gap between ecology and spatial planning in landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology 16:767–779.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
59. 1. Palmer M.A.,
    2. Bernhardt E.S.,
    3. Allan J.D.,
    4. Lake P.S.,
    5. Alexander G.,
    6. Brooks S.,
    7. Carr J.,
    8. Clayton S.,
    9. Dahm C.N.,
    10. Follstad Shah J.,
    11. Galat D.L.,
    12. Loss S.G.,
    13. Goodwin P.,
    14. Hart D.D.,
    15. Hassett B.,
    16. Jenkinson R.,
    17. Kondolf G.M.,
    18. Lave R.,
    19. Meyer J.L.,
    20. O’Donnell T.K.,
    21. Pagano L.,
    22. Sudduthr E.

    2005. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:208–217.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
60. 1. Paul M.J.,
    2. Meyer J.L.

    2001. Streams in the urban landscape. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32:333–365.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
61. 1. Paulsen S.G.,
    2. Mayio A.,
    3. Peck D.V.,
    4. Stoddard J.L.,
    5. Tarquinio E.,
    6. Holdsworth S.M.,
    7. Van Sickle J.,
    8. Yuan L.L.,
    9. Hawkins C.P.,
    10. Herlihy A.T.,
    11. Kaufmann P.R.,
    12. Barbour M.T.,
    13. Larsen D.P.,
    14. Olsen A.R.

    2008. Condition of stream ecosystems in the US: An overview of the first national assessment. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 27:812–821.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
62. 1. Poff N.L.

    1997. Landscape filters and species traits: Towards mechanistic understanding and prediction in stream ecology. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16:391–409.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
63. 1. Poff N.L.,
    2. Allan D.J.,
    3. Bain M.B.,
    4. Karr J.R.,
    5. Prestegaard K.L.,
    6. Richter B.D.,
    7. Sparks R.E.,
    8. Stromberg J.C.

    1997. The natural flow regime: A paradigm for conservation and restoration of riverine ecosystems. Bioscience 47:769–784.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
64. 1. Poiani K.A.,
    2. Richter B.D.,
    3. Anderson M.G.,
    4. Richter H.E.

    2000. Biodiversity conservation at multiple scales: Functional sites, landscapes, and networks. Bioscience 50:133–146.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
65. 1. Pont D.,
    2. Hughes R.M.,
    3. Whittier T.R.,
    4. Schmutz S.

    2009. A predictive index of biotic integrity model for aquatic-vertebrate assemblages of western U.S. streams. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 138:292–305.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
66. 1. Postel S.,
    2. Richter B.D.

    2003. Rivers for Life: Managing Water for People and Nature. Washington DC: Island Press.
67. 1. Pringle C.M.

    1997. Exploring how disturbance is transmitted upstream: Going against the flow. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16:425–438.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
68. 1. Pringle C.M.,
    2. Freeman M.C.,
    3. Freeman B.J.

    2000. Regional effects of hydrologic alterations on riverine macrobiota in the New World: Tropical-temperate comparisons. Bioscience 50:807–823.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
69. 1. Reid L.M.

    1998. Cumulative watershed effects and watershed analysis. Pages 476–501 in Naiman R.J., Bilby R.E. (eds), River Ecology and Management: Lessons from the Pacific Coastal Ecoregion. New York: Springer-Verlag.
70. 1. Ricciardi A.,
    2. Rasmussen J.B.

    1999. Extinction rates of North American freshwater fauna. Conservation Biology 13:1220–1222.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
71. 1. Richards C.,
    2. Johnson L.B.,
    3. Host G.E.

    1996. Landscape-scale influences on stream habitats and biota. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53:295–311.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
72. 1. Riitters K.H.

    2005. Downscaling indicators of forest habitat structure from national assessments. Ecological Indicators 5:273–279.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
73. 1. Roth N.E.,
    2. Allan D.J.,
    3. Erickson D.L.

    1996. Landscape influences on stream biotic integrity assessed at multiple spatial scales. Landscape Ecology 11:141–156.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
74. 1. Schleiger S.L.

    2000. Use of an index of biotic integrity to detect effects of land uses on stream fish communities in west-central Georgia. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129:1118–1133.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
75. 1. Seaber P.R.,
    2. Kapinos F.P.,
    3. Knapp G.L.

    1987. Hydrologic unit maps. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2294. Washington DC: U.S. Geological Survey.
76. 1. Sessions S.L.,
    2. Reeves G.,
    3. Johnson K.N.,
    4. Burnett K.

    1997. Implementing spatial planning in watersheds. Pages 271–280 in Kohm K.A., Franklin J.F. (eds), Creating a Forestry for the 21st Century: The Science of Ecosystem Management. Washington DC: Island Press.
77. 1. Silk N,
    2. Ciruna K.

    2005. A Practitioner’s Guide to Freshwater Biodiversity Conservation. Washington DC: Island Press.
78. 1. Snelder T.,
    2. Biggs B.J.F.

    2002. Multiscale river environment classification for water resources management. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38:1225–1240.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
79. 1. Sowa S.P.,
    2. Annis G.,
    3. Morey M.E.,
    4. Diamond D.D.

    2007. A gap analysis and comprehensive conservation strategy for riverine ecosystems of Missouri. Ecological Monographs 77:301–334.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
80. 1. Sponseller R.A.,
    2. Benfield E.F.,
    3. Valett H.M.

    2001. Relationships between land use, spatial scale and stream macroinvertebrate communities. Freshwater Biology 46:1409–1424.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
81. 1. Stoddard J.L.,
    2. Peck D.V.,
    3. Paulsen S.G.,
    4. Van Sickle J.,
    5. Hawkins C.P.,
    6. Herlihy A.T.,
    7. Hughes R.M.,
    8. Kaufmann P.R.,
    9. Larsen D.P.,
    10. Lomnicky G.,
    11. Olsen A.R.,
    12. Peterson S.A.,
    13. Ringold P.L.,
    14. Whittier T.R.

    2005. An ecological assessment of western streams and rivers. EPA. 620/R-05/005. Washington DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
82. 1. Stein B.A.,
    2. Kutner L.S.,
    3. Adams J.S.

    2000. Precious Heritage: The Status of Biodiversity in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.
83. 1. Taylor C.A.,
    2. Warren M.L.,
    3. Fitzpatrick J.F.,
    4. Hobbs H.H.,
    5. Jezerinac R.F.,
    6. Pflieger W.L.,
    7. Robinson H.W.

    1996. Conservation status of crayfishes of the United States and Canada. Fisheries 21:25–38.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
84. 1. ter Braak C.J.F.,
    2. Prentice I.C.

    1988. A theory of gradient analysis. Pages 271–317 in Begon M., Fitter A.H., Ford E.D., MacFadyen A. (eds),Advances in Ecological Research. London: Academic Press.
85. 1. Timm R.K.,
    2. Wissmar R.C.,
    3. Small J.W.,
    4. Leschine T.M.,
    5. Lucchetti G.

    2004. A screening procedure for prioritizing riparian management. Environmental Management 33:151–161.

    OpenUrlPubMed
86. 1. Tonn W.M.,
    2. Magnuson J.J.,
    3. Rask M.,
    4. Toivonen J.

    1990. Intercontinental comparison of small-lake fish assemblages: The balance between local and regional processes. American Naturalist 136:345–375.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
87. 1. Toth L.A.

    1995. Principles and guidelines for restoration of river/floodplain ecosystems—Kissimmee River, Florida. Pages 49–74 in Cairns J. Jr. . (ed), Rehabilitating Damaged Ecosystems. Boca Raton FL: Lewis.
88. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2010. National inventory of dams. http://geo.usace.army.mil/pgis/f?p=397:1:1201933699896903::NO:::
89. U.S. Bureau of the Census. 2000. Census 2000 TIGER/Line data. www.esri.com/data/download/census2000-tigerline/index.html
90. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2006. Draft wadeable streams assessment: A collaborative survey of the nation’s streams. EPA 841-B-06-002.
91. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2008. Regional environmental monitoring and assessment program. www.epa.gov/emap/remap/index.html
92. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2010. EPA geospatial data download service. www.epa.gov/enviro/geo_data.html.
93. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Geological Survey (USEPA and USGS). 2005. National hydrography dataset plus, NHDPlus Version 1.0. www.horizon-systems.com/nhdplus/
94. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2005. Active mines and mineral processing plants in the United States in 2003. http://tin.er.usgs.gov/metadata/mineplant.faq.html
95. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 2006. National elevation dataset. http://ned.usgs.gov/
96. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2008. Multi-resolution land characteristics consortium: National land cover database. www.mrlc.gov/nlcd_multizone_map.php.
97. 1. Vörösmarty C.,
    2. Leveque C.,
    3. Revenga C.

    2005. Freshwater. Pages 165–207 in Hassan R., Scholes R., Ash N. (eds), Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and Trends. Washington DC: Island Press.
98. 1. Wang L.Z.,
    2. Brenden T.,
    3. Seelbach P.,
    4. Cooper A.,
    5. Allan D.,
    6. Clark R.,
    7. Wiley M.

    2008. Landscape based identification of human disturbance gradients and reference conditions for Michigan streams. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 141:1–17.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
99. 1. Wang L.Z.,
    2. Lyons J.,
    3. Kanehl P.,
    4. Gatti R.

    1997. Influences of watershed land use on habitat quality and biotic integrity in Wisconsin streams. Fisheries 22:6–12.

    OpenUrl
100. 1. Wang L.Z.,
     2. Lyons J.,
     3. Rasmussen P.,
     4. Seelbach P.,
     5. Simon T.,
     6. Wiley M.,
     7. Kanehl P.,
     8. Baker E.,
     9. Niemela S.,
     10. Stewart P.M.

     2003. Watershed, reach, and riparian influences on stream fish assemblages in the Northern Lakes and Forest Ecoregion, USA. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 60:491–505.

     OpenUrlCrossRef
101. 1. Wang L.Z.,
     2. Seelbach P.,
     3. Hughes R.M.

     2006. Introduction to landscape influences on stream habitats and biological assemblages. American Fisheries Society Symposium 48:1–23.

     OpenUrlWeb of Science
102. 1. Weisberg S

     . 1985. Applied Linear Regression, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley.
103. 1. Whittier T.R.,
     2. Hughes R.M.,
     3. Lomnicky G.A.,
     4. Peck D.V.

     2007a. Fish and amphibian tolerance values and an assemblage tolerance index for streams and rivers in the western USA. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 136:254–271.

     OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
104. 1. Whittier T.R.,
     2. Hughes R.M.,
     3. Stoddard J.L.,
     4. Lomnicky G.A.,
     5. Peck D.V.,
     6. Herlihy A.T.

     2007b. A structured approach for developing indices of biotic integrity: Three examples from streams and rivers in the western USA. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 136:718–735.

     OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
105. 1. Wickham J.D.,
     2. Jones K.B.,
     3. Riitters K.H.,
     4. O’Neill R.V.,
     5. Tankersley R.D.,
     6. Smith E.R.,
     7. Neale A.C.,
     8. Chaloud D.J.

     1999. An integrated environmental assessment of the US mid-Atlantic region. Environmental Management 24:553–560.

     OpenUrlPubMed
106. 1. Yuan L.L.,
     2. Hawkins C.P.,
     3. Van Sickle J.

     2008. Effects of regionalization decisions on an O/E index for the US national assessment. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 27:892–905.

     OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
107. 1. Zaroban D.W.,
     2. Mulvey M.P.,
     3. Maret T.R.,
     4. Hughes R.M.,
     5. Merritt G.D.

     1999. Classification of species attributes for Pacific Northwest freshwater fishes. Northwest Science 73:81–93.

     OpenUrlWeb of Science