Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Ecological Restoration
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Ecological Restoration

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleArticles

Odonata Richness and Abundance in Relation to Vegetation Structure in Restored and Native Wetlands of the Prairie Pothole Region, USA

Catherine Mabry and Connie Dettman
Ecological Restoration, December 2010, 28 (4) 475-484; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/er.28.4.475
Catherine Mabry
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Connie Dettman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

    1. Annen C.A.,
    2. Kirsch E.M.,
    3. Tyser R.W.
    2008. Reed canarygrass invasions alter succession patterns and may reduce habitat quality in wet meadows. Ecological Restoration 26:190–193.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Beule J.D.
    1979. Control and management of cattails in southeastern Wisconsin wetlands. Technical Bulletin No. 112. Madison: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
    1. Bick G.H.,
    2. Bick J.C.
    1972. Substrate utilization during reproduction by Argia plana Calvert and Argia moesta (Hagen) (Odonata:Coenagrionidae). Odonatologica 1:3–9.
    OpenUrl
    1. Bishop R.A.,
    2. Joens J.,
    3. Zohrer J.
    1998. Iowa’s wetlands, present and future with a focus on prairie potholes. Journal of the Iowa Academy of Science 105 (3):89–93.
    OpenUrl
    1. Bried J.T.,
    2. Ervin G.N.
    2005. Distribution of adult Odonata among localized wetlands in east-central Mississippi. Southeastern Naturalist 4:731–744.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Carchini G.,
    2. Solimini A.G.,
    3. Ruggiero A.
    2005. Habitat characteristics and odonate diversity in mountain ponds of central Italy. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 15:573–581.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Chovanec A.,
    2. Raab R.
    1997. Dragonflies (Insecta, Odonata) and the ecological status of newly created wetlands—Examples for long-term bioindication programmes. Limnologica 27:381–392.
    OpenUrl
    1. Clark T.E.,
    2. Samways M.
    1996. Dragonflies (Odonata) as indicators of biotope quality in the Kruger National Park, South Africa. Journal of Applied Ecology 33:1001–1012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Corbet P.S.
    1995. Habitats and habits of world dragonflies and the need to conserve species and habitats. Pages 1–7 in Corbet P.S., Dunkle S.W., Ubukata H. (eds), Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Conservation of Dragonflies and their Habitats. Kushiro: Japanese Society for Preservation of Birds.
    1. Corbet P.S.
    1999. Dragonflies. Ithaca NY: Comstock.
    1. Cruden B. W.,
    2. Gode O.J.
    1998. Progress report #4. Unpublished report submitted to the Camp Dodge Environmental Section.
    1. Cruden B. W.,
    2. Gode O.J.
    2000. The Odonata of Iowa. Bulletin of American Odonatology 6 (2):13–48.
    OpenUrl
    1. Dahl T.E.
    1990. Wetlands losses in the United States 1780’s to 1980’s. Washington DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
    1. Delphey P.J.,
    2. Dinsmore J.J.
    1993. Breeding bird communities of recently restored and natural prairie wetlands. Wetlands 13:200–206.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. DuBois B.
    2005. Damselflies of the North Woods. Duluth MN: Kollath-Stensaas.
    1. Dunkle S.W.
    2000. Dragonflies through Binoculars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    1. Elzinga C.L.,
    2. Salzer D.W.,
    3. Willoughby J.W.
    1998. Measuring and monitoring plant populations. Bureau of Land Management Technical Reference 1730–1.
    1. Euliss N.H. Jr..,
    2. Wrubleski D.A.,
    3. Mushet D.M.
    1999. Wetlands of the prairie pothole region. Pages 471–514 in Batzer D.P., Rader R.B., Wissinger S.A. (eds), Invertebrates in Freshwater Wetlands of North America. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    1. Fairbairn S.E.,
    2. Dinsmore J.J.
    2001. Factors associated with occurrence and density of wetland birds in the prairie pothole region of Iowa. Journal of the Iowa Academy of Science 108 (1):8–14.
    OpenUrl
    1. Fidler F.,
    2. Burgman M.A.,
    3. Cumming G.,
    4. Buttrose R.,
    5. Thomason N.
    2006. Impact of criticism of null-hypothesis significance testing on statistical reporting practices in conservation biology. Conservation Biology 20:1539–1544.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Foote A.L.,
    2. Rice Hornung C.L.
    2005. Odonates as biological indicators of grazing effects on Canadian prairie wetlands. Ecological Entomology 30:273–283.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Galatowitsch S.M.,
    2. Anderson N.O.,
    3. Ascher P.D.
    1999. Invasiveness in wetland plants in temperate North America. Wetlands 19:733–755.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Galatowitsch S.M.,
    2. van der Valk A. G.
    1994. Restoring Prairie Wetlands: An Ecological Approach. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
    1. Galatowitsch S.M.,
    2. van der Valk A. G.
    1996. Characteristics of newly restored prairie potholes. Wetlands 16:75–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
    1. Gibbons L.K.,
    2. Reed J.M.,
    3. Chew F.S.
    2002. Habitat requirements and local persistence of three damselfly species (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Journal of Insect Conservation 6:47–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Gleason R.A.,
    2. Laubhan M.K.,
    3. Euliss N.H. Jr..
    , eds. 2008. Ecosystem services derived from wetland conservation practices in the United States prairie pothole region with an emphasis on the U.S. Department of Agriculture Conservation Reserve and Wetlands Reserve Programs. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1745.
    1. Grace J.B.,
    2. Harrison J.S.
    1986. The biology of Canadian weeds. 73. Typha latifolia L., Typha angustifolia L. and Typha × glauca Godr. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 66:361–379.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Great Plains Flora Association (GPFA)
    . 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
    1. Hawking J.H.,
    2. New T.R.
    1999. The distribution patterns of dragonflies (Insecta: Odonata) along the Kiewa River, Australia, and their relevance in conservation assessment. Hydrobiologia 392:249–260.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Hutto R.L.,
    2. Pletschet S.M.,
    3. Hendricks P.
    1986. A fixed-radius point count method for nonbreeding and breeding season use. Auk 103:593–602.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
    1. Iowa Odonata Survey (IOS)
    . 2005. Dragonflies and damselflies of Iowa. www.iowaodes.com
    1. Kiauta M.
    1986. Dragonfly in haiku. Odonatologica 15:91–96.
    OpenUrl
    1. Kirsch E.M.,
    2. Gray B.R.,
    3. Fox T.S.,
    4. Thogmartin W.E.
    2007. Breeding bird territory placement in riparian wet meadows in relation to invasive reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea L.). Wetlands 27:755–766.
    OpenUrl
    1. Madson C.L.,
    2. Jones M.L.,
    3. Ratcliff H.,
    4. Wetzel P.R.,
    5. Leugner S.,
    6. et al.
    2001. Integrated natural resource management plan. Johnston: Iowa Army National Guard Environmental Branch.
    1. Major J.D.
    2009. Animals in the restoration process—Progressing the trends. Restoration Ecology 17:315–319.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. McCauley S.J.
    2006. The effects of dispersal and recruitment limitation on community structure of odonates in artificial ponds. Ecography 29:585–595.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. McCauley S.J.
    2007. The role of local and regional processes in structuring larval dragonfly distribution across habitat gradients. Oikos 116:121–133.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. McKay T.,
    2. Herman T.
    2008. Thermoregulation in three species of damselflies, with notes on temporal distribution and habitat use (Zygoptera: Lestidae). Odonatologica 37:29–39.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
    1. Mead K.
    2003. Dragonflies of the North Woods. Duluth MN: Kollath-Stensaas.
    1. Moore N.W.
    1991. The development of dragonfly communities and the consequences of territorial behavior: A 27-year study on small ponds at Woodwalten Fen, Cambridgeshire, UK. Odonatologica 20:203–231.
    OpenUrl
    1. Mulhouse J.M,
    2. Galatowitsch S.M.
    2003. Revegetation of prairie pothole wetlands in the mid-continental US: Twelve years post-reflooding. Plant Ecology 169:143–159.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Müller Z.,
    2. Jakab T.,
    3. Tóth A.,
    4. Dévai G.,
    5. Szállassy N.,
    6. et al.
    2003. Effect of sports fisherman activities on dragonfly assemblages on a Hungarian river floodplain. Biodiversity and Conservation 12:167–179.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. National Climatic Data Center (NCDC)
    . 2005. Freeze/frost occurrence data. cdo.ncdc.noaa.gov/climatenormals/clim20supp1/states/IA.pdf
    1. National Weather Service
    . 2008. Des Moines, IA: NOWData—NOAA online weather data. www.weather.gov/climate/xmacis.php?wfo=dmx
    1. NatureServe
    . 2009. NatureServe conservation status: National and subnational conservation status ranks. Vers. 7.1. www.natureserve.org/explorer/ranking.htm#natsub
    1. Pither J.,
    2. Taylor P.D.
    1998. An experimental assessment of landscape connectivity. Oikos 83:166–174.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Pollard A.
    1977. A method for assessing changes in the abundance of butterflies. Biological Conservation 12:115–134.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Roush S.A.,
    2. Anon J.P.
    2003. Repopulation of restored wetland habitat by Odonata (dragonflies and damselflies). Ecological Restoration 21:174–179.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Schindler M.,
    2. Fesl C.,
    3. Chovanec A.
    2003. Dragonfly associations (Insecta: Odonata) in relation to habitat variables: A multivariate approach. Hydrobiologia 497:169–180.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Schmidt E.
    1985. Habitat inventarization, characterization and bioindication by a “Representative Spectrum of Odonata Species (RSO).” Odonatologica 14:127–133.
    OpenUrl
    1. Schmidt E.
    1995. A survey of threatened dragonfly habitats in central Europe, especially bogs, and bog management. Pages 45–68 in Corbet P.S., Dunkle S.W., Ubukata H. (eds), Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Conservation of Dragonflies and their Habitats. Kushiro: Japanese Society for Preservation of Birds.
    1. Stewart T.W.,
    2. Downing J.A.
    2008. Macroinvertebrate communities and environmental conditions in recently constructed wetlands. Wetlands 28:141–150.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Thorp J.H.,
    2. Cothran M.L.
    1984. Regulation of freshwater community structure at multiple intensities of dragonfly predation. Ecology 65:1546–1555.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Van der Valk A.
    1989. Northern Prairie Wetlands. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
    1. VanRees-Siewert K.L.,
    2. Dinsmore J.J.
    1996. Influence of wetland age on bird use of restored wetlands in Iowa. Wetlands 16:577–582.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Voshell J.R.,
    2. Simmons G.M. Jr.
    . 1978. The Odonata of a new reservoir in the southeastern United States. Odonatologica 7:67–76.
    OpenUrl
    1. Watson J.A.L.,
    2. Arthington A.H.,
    3. Conrick D.L.
    1982. Effect of sewage effluent on dragonflies (Odonata) of Bulimba Creek, Brisbane. Australian Journal of Marine & Freshwater Research 33:517–528.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Westfall M.J.,
    2. May M.L.
    2006. Damselflies of North America. Gainesville FL: Scientific Publishers.
    1. Whedon A.D.
    1912. The Odonata of Iowa. MS thesis, University of Iowa.
    1. Wikum D.A.,
    2. Shanholtzer G.F.
    1978. Application of Braun-Blanquet cover-abundance scale for vegetation analysis in land development studies. Environmental Management 2:323–329.
    OpenUrl
    1. Zohrer J.J.
    2001. Prairie/wetland complex restoration in the prairie pothole region of Iowa. Pages 136–137 in Bernstein N.P., Ostrander L.J. (eds), Proceedings of the 17th North American Prairie Conference. Mason City: North Iowa Area Community College.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ecological Restoration: 28 (4)
Ecological Restoration
Vol. 28, Issue 4
1 Dec 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ecological Restoration.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Odonata Richness and Abundance in Relation to Vegetation Structure in Restored and Native Wetlands of the Prairie Pothole Region, USA
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ecological Restoration
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ecological Restoration web site.
Citation Tools
Odonata Richness and Abundance in Relation to Vegetation Structure in Restored and Native Wetlands of the Prairie Pothole Region, USA
Catherine Mabry, Connie Dettman
Ecological Restoration Dec 2010, 28 (4) 475-484; DOI: 10.3368/er.28.4.475

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Odonata Richness and Abundance in Relation to Vegetation Structure in Restored and Native Wetlands of the Prairie Pothole Region, USA
Catherine Mabry, Connie Dettman
Ecological Restoration Dec 2010, 28 (4) 475-484; DOI: 10.3368/er.28.4.475
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Impact of recreational fisheries on aquatic and riparian biodiversity in artificial lake ecosystems: implications for conservation
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Choosing Plant Diversity Metrics: A Tallgrass Prairie Case Study
  • A Conceptual Planning Framework to Improve Integration of Reclamation with Site Remediation
  • Genetic Diversity, Mating System, and Reproductive Output of Restored Melaleuca acuminata Populations are Comparable to Natural Remnant Populations
Show more Articles

Research Report

  • Cultural Acceptability of Alternative Pit and Quarry Rehabilitations
  • Vegetation Response after Removal of the Invasive Carpobrotus Hybrid Complex in Andalucía, Spain
Show more Research Report

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • habitat structure
  • invasive species
  • odonates
  • Prairie Pothole Region
  • wetland restoration
UW Press logo

© 2025 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire