Linking Geomorphological and Ecological Responses in Restored Urban Pool-Riffle Streams

References

1. 1. Allan J.D.,
   2. Meyer J.,
   3. Bernhardt E.S.

   , eds. 2007. Special section: Restoring rivers; A synthesis of findings from project records and interviews. Restoration Ecology 15:472–591.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. 1. Angradi T.R.

   1999. Fine sediment and macroinvertebrate assemblages in Appalachian streams: A field experiment with biomonitoring applications. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 18:49–66.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Barbour M.T.,
   2. Gerritsen J.,
   3. Snyder B.D.,
   4. Stribling J.B.

   1999. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: Periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish, 2nd ed. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Document EPA 841-B99-002. www.epa.gov/owow/monitoring/rbp/
4. 1. Bernhardt E.S.,
   2. Palmer M.A.

   2007. Restoring streams in an urbanizing world. Freshwater Biology 52:738–751.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. 1. Bernhardt E.S.,
   2. Palmer M.A.,
   3. Allan J.D.,
   4. Alexander G.,
   5. Barnas K.,
   6. et al.

   2005. Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts. Science 308:636–637.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
6. 1. Biggs J.,
   2. Corfield A.,
   3. Grøn P.,
   4. Hansen H.O.,
   5. Walker D.,
   6. et al.

   1998. Restoration of the rivers Brede, Cole and Skerne: A joint Danish and British EU-LIFE demonstration project, V—Short-term impacts on the conservation value of aquatic macroinvertebrate and macrophyte assemblages. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8:241–254.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. 1. Bij de Vaate A.,
   2. Klink A.G.,
   3. Greijdanus-Klaas M.,
   4. Jans L.H.,
   5. Oosterbaan J.,
   6. Kok F.

   2007. Effects of habitat restoration on the macroinvertebrate fauna in a foreland along the River Waal, the main distributary in the Rhine Delta. River Research and Applications 23:171–183.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. 1. Byars M.S.,
   2. Kelly M.

   2004. Sediment transport in urban stream restoration. In Phelps D., Sehlke G. (eds), Proceedings of the World Water and Environmental Resources Congress 2001, May 20–24, Orlando FL. Available on CD-ROM.
9. 1. Chambers P.A.,
   2. Culp J.M.,
   3. Glozier N.E.,
   4. Cash K.J.,
   5. Wrona F.J.,
   6. Noton L.

   2006. Northern rivers ecosystem initiative: Nutrients and dissolved oxygen—Issues and impacts. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 113:117–141.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 1. Chin A.

    2003. The geomorphic significance of step-pools in mountain streams. Geomorphology 55:125–137.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
11. 1. Chin A.

    2006. Urban transformation of river landscapes in a global context. Geomorphology 79:406–487.

    OpenUrl
12. 1. Chin A.,
    2. Anderson S.,
    3. Collison A.,
    4. Ellis-Sugai B.,
    5. Haltiner J.P.,
    6. et al.

    2009a. Linking theory and practice for restoration of step-pool streams. Environmental Management 43:645–661.

    OpenUrlPubMed
13. 1. Chin A.,
    2. Purcell A.H.,
    3. Quan J.W.,
    4. Resh V.H.

    2009b. Assessing geomorphological and ecological responses in restored step-pool systems. Geological Society of America Special Papers 451:199–214.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
14. 1. Chin A.,
    2. Wohl E.

    2005. Toward a theory for step pools in stream channels. Progress in Physical Geography 29 (3):1–22.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
15. 1. Chow V.T.

    1959. Open-Channel Hydraulics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16. 1. Dale V.H.,
    2. Brown S.,
    3. Haueber R.A.,
    4. Hobbs N.T.,
    5. Huntly N.,
    6. et al.

    2000. Ecological principles and guidelines for managing the use of land: An ESA Report. Ecological Applications 10:639–670.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. 1. Davis J.R.

    1997. A benthic index of biotic integrity (B-IBI) for Texas lotic-erosional habitats. Draft report. Austin: Data Collection Section, Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission.
18. 1. Doeg T.J.,
    2. Koehn J.D.

    1994. Effects of draining and desiltation of a small weir on downstream fish and macroinvertebrates. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 9:263–277.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. 1. Florsheim J.L.,
    2. Mount J.F.,
    3. Chin A.

    2008. Bank erosion as a desirable attribute of rivers. BioScience 58:519–529.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. 1. Friberg N.,
    2. Kronvang B.,
    3. Hansen H.O.,
    4. Svendsen L.M.

    1998. Long-term, habitat-specific response of a macroinvertebrate community to river restoration. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8:87–99.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
21. 1. Gould F.W.

    1975. Texas Plants: A Checklist and Ecological Summary. College Station: Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M University System.
22. 1. Griffith G.E.,
    2. Bryce S.A.,
    3. Omernik J.M.,
    4. Comstock J.A.,
    5. Rogers A.C.,
    6. et al.

    2004. Ecoregions of Texas. Color poster with map (scale 1:2,500,000), descriptive text, and photographs. Reston VA: U.S. Geological Survey.
23. 1. Haltiner J.P.,
    2. Kondolf G.M.,
    3. Williams P.B.

    1996. Restoration approaches in California. Pages 291–329 in Brookes A., Shields F.D. Jr.. (eds), River Channel Restoration: Guiding Principles for Sustainable Projects. Chichester UK: Wiley.
24. 1. Herbst D.B.,
    2. Kane J.M.

    2009. Responses of aquatic macroinvertebrates to stream channel reconstruction in a degraded rangeland creek in the Sierra Nevada. Ecological Restoration 27:76–88.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
25. 1. Jongman R.H.G.,
    2. ter Braak C.J.F.,
    3. van Tongeren O.F.R.

    1987. Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. Wageningen, the Netherlands: Pudoc.
26. 1. Kaller M.D.,
    2. Hartman K.J.

    2004. Evidence of a threshold level of fine sediment accumulation for altering benthic macroinvertebrate communities. Hydrobiologia 518:95–104.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
27. 1. Knighton D.

    1998. Fluvial Forms and Processes: A New Perspective. London: Arnold.
28. 1. Kondolf G.M.

    1995. Five elements for effective stream restoration. Restoration Ecology 3:133–136.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
29. 1. Kondolf G.M.,
    2. Anderson S.,
    3. Lave R.,
    4. Pagano L.,
    5. Merenlender A.,
    6. Bernhardt E.S.

    2007. Two decades of river restoration in California: What can we learn? Restoration Ecology 15:516–523.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. 1. Kondolf G.M.,
    2. Micheli E.R.

    1995. Evaluating stream restoration projects. Environmental Management 19:1–15.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
31. 1. Larkin T.J.,
    2. Bomar G.W.

    1983. Climatic atlas of Texas. Austin: Texas Department of Water Resources.
32. 1. Lenzi M.A.

    2002. Stream bed stabilization using boulder check dams that mimic step-pool morphology features in northern Italy. Geomorphology 45:243–260.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
33. 1. Lepori F.,
    2. Palm D.,
    3. Brännäs E.,
    4. Malmqvist B.

    2005. Does restoration of structural heterogeneity in streams enhance fish and macroinvertebrate diversity? Ecological Applications 15:2060–2071.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. 1. Lepš J.,
    2. Šmilauer P.

    2003. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data using CANOCO. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
35. 1. Lorenz A.,
    2. Hering D.,
    3. Feld C.K.,
    4. Rolauffs P.

    2004. A new method for assessing the impact of hydromorphological degradation on the macroinvertebrate fauna of five German stream types. Hydrobiologia 516:107–127.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
36. 1. Marsh W.M.,
    2. Marsh N.L.

    1995. Hydrogeomorphic considerations in development planning and stormwater management, central Texas hill country, USA. Environmental Management 19:693–702.

    OpenUrl
37. 1. Merritt R.W.,
    2. Cummins K.W.

    1996. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America, 3rd ed. Dubuque IA: Kendall/Hunt.
38. 1. Meyer J.L.,
    2. Paul M.J.,
    3. Taulbee W.K.

    2005. Stream ecosystem function in urbanizing landscapes. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 24:602–612.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
39. 1. Minshall G.W.

    1984. Aquatic insectsubstratum relationships. Pages 358–400 in Resh V.H., Rosenberg D.M. (eds), The Ecology of Aquatic Insects. New York: Praeger.
40. 1. Montgomery D.R.,
    2. M Buffington J.

    1997. Channel-reach morphology in mountain drainage basins. Geological Society of America Bulletin 109:596–611.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
41. 1. Murdock J.,
    2. Roelke D.,
    3. Gelwick F.

    2004. Interactions between flow, periphyton, and nutrients in a heavily impacted urban stream: Implications for stream restoration effectiveness. Ecological Engineering 22:197–207.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
42. 1. Niemi G.J.,
    2. DeVore P.,
    3. Detenbeck N.,
    4. Yount J.D.,
    5. Lima A.,
    6. et al.

    1990. Overview of case studies on recovery of aquatic systems from disturbance. Environmental Management 14:571–588.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
43. 1. Palmer M.A.

    2009. Reforming watershed restoration: Science in need of application and applications in need of science. Estuaries and Coasts 32:1–17.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
44. 1. Palmer M.A.,
    2. Allan J.D.,
    3. Meyer J.,
    4. Bernhardt E.S.

    2007. River restoration in the twenty-first century: Data and experiential knowledge to inform future efforts. Restoration Ecology 15:472–481.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
45. 1. Palmer M.A.,
    2. Bernhardt E.S.,
    3. Allan J. D.,
    4. Lake P.S.,
    5. Alexander G.,
    6. et al.

    2005. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:208–217.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
46. 1. Paul M.J.,
    2. Meyer J.L.

    2001. Streams in the urban landscape. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32:333–365.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
47. 1. Poff N.L.,
    2. Ward J.V.

    1990. Physical habitat template of lotic systems: Recovery in the context of historical pattern of spatiotemporal heterogeneity. Environmental Management 14:629–645.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
48. 1. Pretty J.L.,
    2. Harrison S.S.C.,
    3. Sheperd D.J.,
    4. Smith C.,
    5. Hildrew A.G.,
    6. Hey R.D.

    2003. River rehabilitation and fish populations: Assessing the benefit of instream structures. Journal of Applied Ecology 40:251–265.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
49. 1. Purcell A.H.,
    2. Friedrich C.,
    3. Resh V.H.

    2002. An assessment of a small urban stream restoration project in northern California. Restoration Ecology 10:685–694.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
50. 1. Resh V.H.,
    2. Myers M.J.,
    3. Hannaford M.J.

    1996. Macroinvertebrates as biotic indicators of environmental quality. Pages 647–665 in Hauer F.R., Lamberti G.A. (eds), Methods in Stream Ecology. San Diego: Academic Press.
51. 1. Roni P.,
    2. Beechie T.J.,
    3. Bilby R.E.,
    4. Leonetti F.E.,
    5. Pollock M.M.,
    6. Pess G.R.

    2002. A review of stream restoration techniques and a hierarchical strategy for prioritizing restoration in Pacific Northwest watersheds. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22:1–20.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
52. 1. Scoggins M.

    2002. Waller Creek status report. City of Austin Technical Report.
53. 1. Sudduth E.B.,
    2. Meyer J.L.

    2006. Effects of bioengineered streambank stabilization on bank habitat and macroinvertebrates in urban streams. Environmental Management 38:218–226.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
54. 1. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ)

    . 2007. Surface water quality monitoring procedures, volume 2: Methods for collecting and analyzing biological assemblage and habitat data. Monitoring Operations Division Regulatory Guidance RG-416.
55. 1. Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission (TNRCC)

    . 1999. Receiving waters assessment procedures manual. Water Quality Division General Information Document GI-253.
56. 1. Thorp J.H.,
    2. Covich A.P.

    , eds. 1991. Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates. San Diego: Academic Press.
57. 1. Walther D.A.,
    2. Whiles M.R.

    2008. Macroinvertebrate responses to constructed riffles in the Cache River, Illinois, USA. Environmental Management 41:516–527.

    OpenUrlPubMed
58. 1. Wohl E.,
    2. Chin A.,
    3. Haltiner J.,
    4. Kondolf M.

    2010. Managing stream morphology with check dams. Pages 135–149 in Conesa Garcia C., Lenzi M.A. (eds), Check Dams, Morphological Adjustment and Erosional Control in Torrential Streams. Hauppauge NY: Nova Science Publishers.
59. 1. Zipperer W.C.,
    2. Wu J.,
    3. Pouyat R.V.,
    4. Pickett S.T.A.

    2000. The application of ecological principles to urban and urbanizing landscapes. Ecological Applications 10:685–688.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science