Integrating Ecological and Ethnobotanical Priorities into Riparian Restoration

References

1. 1. Allen A.E.

   2004. Determining reference sites and prioritizing species for riparian restoration of the Ayuquila River, west-central Mexico. MS thesis, University of Wisconsin–Madison.
2. 1. Anderson M.K,
   2. Barbour M.G.

   2003. Simulated indigenous management: A new model for ecological restoration in National Parks. Ecological Restoration 21:269–277.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
3. 1. Benz B.F.,
   2. Cevallos E J.,
   3. Munoz M E.,
   4. Santana M F.

   1996. Ethnobotany serving society: A case study from the Sierra de Manantlán Biosphere Reserve. SIDA, Contributions to Botany 17:1–16.

   OpenUrl
4. 1. Benz B.F.,
   2. Cevallos E. J.,
   3. Santana M. F.,
   4. Rosales A. J.,
   5. Graf M. S.

   2000. Losing knowledge about plant use in the Sierra de Manantlán Biosphere Reserve, Mexico. Economic Botany 54:183–191.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
5. 1. Benz B.F.,
   2. Santana M. F.,
   3. Pineda L. R.,
   4. Cevallos E. J.,
   5. Robles H. L.,
   6. de Niz L. D.

   1994. Characterization of mestizo plant use in the Sierra de Manantlán, Jalisco-Colima, Mexico. Journal of Ethnobiology 14:23–41.

   OpenUrl
6. 1. Bernhardt E.S.,
   2. Palmer M.A.,
   3. Allan J.D.,
   4. Alexander G.,
   5. Barnas K.,
   6. et al.

   2005. Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts. Science 308:636–637.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
7. 1. Bye R.

   1995. Ethnobotany of the Mexican tropical dry forests. Pages 423– 437 in Bullock S.H., Mooney H.A., Medina E. (eds), Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. 1. Casas A.,
   2. Valiente-Banuet A.,
   3. Viveros J.L.,
   4. Cabellero J.,
   5. Cortes L.,
   6. et al.

   2001. Plant resources of the Tehuacan-Cuicatlan Valley, Mexico. Economic Botany 55:129–166.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. 1. Comisión Nacional del Agua (CNA)

   . 2001. Estudio sobre disponibilidad y balance hidráulico actualizado de aguas superficiales de la región hidrológica. No. 16C Río Armería. Unpublished report produced by Altiplano de Ingenieria, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.
10. 1. Cuevas G.R.,
    2. Núñez L. N.M.,
    3. Guzmán H. L.,
    4. Santana-Michel F.J.

    1998. El bosque tropical caducifolio en la reserva de la biosfera Sierra de Manantlán, Jalisco-Colima, México. Boletín del Instituto de Botánica 5:445–491.

    OpenUrl
11. 1. Davis M.A.,
    2. Slobodkin L.B.

    2004. The science and values of restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 12:1–3.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. 1. Ducros C.M.J.,
    2. Joyce C.B.

    2003. Field-based evaluation tool for riparian buffer zones in agricultural catchments. Environmental Management 32:252–267.

    OpenUrlPubMed
13. 1. Flanagan C.,
    2. Laituri M.

    2004. Local cultural knowledge and water resource management: The Wind River Indian Reservation. Environmental Management 33:262–270.

    OpenUrlPubMed
14. 1. Frissell C.A.,
    2. Liss W.J.,
    3. Warren C.E.,
    4. Hurley M.D.

    1986. A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: Viewing streams in a watershed context. Environmental Management 10:199–214.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. 1. Gentry A.H.

    1995. Diversity and floristic composition of neotropical dry forests. Pages 243–276 in Bullock S.H., Mooney H.A., Medina E. (eds), Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. 1. Gergel S.E.,
    2. Turner M.G.,
    3. Miller J.R.,
    4. Melack J.M.,
    5. Stanley E.H.

    2002. Landscape indicators of human impacts to riverine systems. Aquatic Science 64:118–128.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
17. 1. Gerritsen P.

    1998. Community development, natural resource management and biodiversity conservation in the Sierra de Manantlán Biosphere, Mexico. Community Development Journal 33:314–324.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
18. 1. Gerritsen P.R.W.

    2002. Diversity at stake: A farmers’ perspective on biodiversity and conservation in western Mexico. PhD dissertation, Circle for Rural European Studies, Wageningen Universiteit, The Netherlands.
19. 1. Harris R.R.

    1999. Defining reference conditions for restoration of riparian plant communities: Examples from California, USA. Environmental Management 24:55–63.

    OpenUrlGeoRefPubMed
20. 1. Harris R.,
    2. Olson C.

    1997. Two-stage system for prioritizing riparian restoration at the stream reach and community scales. Restoration Ecology 5:34–42.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
21. 1. Hobbs R.J.,
    2. Davis M.A.,
    3. Slobodkin L.B.,
    4. Lackey R.T.,
    5. Halvorson W.,
    6. Throop W.

    2004. Restoration ecology: The challenge of social values and expectations. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2:43–48.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. 1. Iltis H.

    1980. The 3rd University of Wisconsin-University of Guadalajara teosinte expedition to the Sierra de Manantlán, Jalisco, Mexico: December 28, 1979 to January 21, 1980. Background, preliminary results, and commentary on nature preservation in Mexico. Contributions from the University of Wisconsin Herbarium 1(1), Madison.
23. 1. Karr J.R.

    1991. Biological integrity: A long neglected aspect of water-resource management. Ecological Applications 1:66–84.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. 1. Karr J.R.,
    2. Dudley D.R.

    1981. Ecological perspectives on water quality goals. Environmental Management 5:55–68.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
25. 1. Lyons J.,
    2. Navarro-Pérez S.,
    3. Cochran P.A.,
    4. Santana C E.,
    5. Guzmán-Arroyo M.

    1995. Index of biotic integrity based on fish assemblages for the conservation of streams and rivers in west-central Mexico. Conservation Biology 9:569–584.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
26. 1. Maddock I.

    1999. The importance of physical habitat assessment for evaluating river health. Freshwater Biology 41:373–391.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
27. 1. Magurran A.E.

    2004. Measuring Biological Diversity. Oxford UK: Blackwell.
28. 1. Martínez D.

    2003. Protected areas, indigenous peoples, and the western idea of nature. Ecological Restoration 21:247–250.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
29. 1. Martínez L.M.,
    2. Carranza M. A.,
    3. García M.

    1999. Aquatic ecosystem pollution of the Ayuquila River, Sierra de Manantlán Biosphere Reserve, Mexico. Pages 1–17 in Munawar M., Lawrence S., Munawar I.F., Malley D. (eds), Aquatic Ecosystems of Mexico: Status and Scope. Leiden, Netherlands: Backhuys.
30. 1. Martínez R. L.M.,
    2. Santana C. E.,
    3. Iniguez L.I.,
    4. Santana M. F.J.,
    5. Carranza M. A.

    2000. Programa de acciones del Ingenio Melchor Ocampo para la restauración del Río Ayuquila. Final technical report. Instituto Mananatlán de Ecología y Conservación de la Biodiversidad, Universidad de Guadalajara.
31. 1. Mercado-Silva N.

    2001. Fish communities, fisheries, and public perception of the Ayuquila River in West Central Mexico. MS thesis, University of Wisconsin–Madison.
32. 1. Millward A.A.,
    2. Mersey J.E.

    2001. Conservation strategies for effective land management of protected areas using an erosion prediction information system (EPIS). Journal of Environmental Management 61:329–343.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 1. Mooney H.A.,
    2. Bullock S.H.,
    3. Medina E.

    1995. Introduction. Pages 1–8 in Bullock S.H., Mooney H.A., Medina E. (eds), Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
34. 1. Murphy P.,
    2. Lugo A.E.

    1995. Dry forests of Central America and the Caribbean. Pages 146–194 in Bullock S.H., Mooney H.A., Medina E. (eds), Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
35. 1. Naiman R.J.,
    2. Bunn S.E.,
    3. Nilsson C.,
    4. Petts G.E.,
    5. Pinay G.,
    6. Thompson L. C.

    2002. Legitimizing fluvial ecosystems as users of water: An overview. Environmental Management 30:455–467.

    OpenUrlPubMed
36. 1. Nilsson C.,
    2. Svedmark M.

    2002. Basic principles and ecological consequences of changing water regimes: Riparian plant communities. Environmental Management 30:468–480.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
37. 1. Olson C.,
    2. Harris R.

    1997. Applying a two-stage system to prioritize riparian restoration at the San Luis Rey River, San Diego County, California. Restoration Ecology 5:43–55.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
38. 1. Palmer M.A.,
    2. Bernhardt E.S.,
    3. Allan J.D.,
    4. Lake P.S.,
    5. Alexander G.,
    6. et al.

    2005. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:208–217.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
39. 1. Palmer M.,
    2. Bernhardt E.S.,
    3. Chornesky E.,
    4. Collins S.,
    5. Dobson A.,
    6. et al.

    2004. Ecology for a crowded planet. Science 304:1251–1252.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
40. 1. Peters C.M.,
    2. Purata S.E.,
    3. Chibnik M.,
    4. Brosi B.J.,
    5. Lopez A.M.,
    6. Ambrosio M.

    2003. The life and times of Bursera Gladrifolia (H.B.K.) Engl. in Mexico: A parable for ethnobotany. Economic Botany 57:431–441.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
41. 1. Pfadenhauer J.

    2001. Some remarks on the socio-cultural background of restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 9:220–229.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
42. 1. Rheinhardt R.D.,
    2. Rheinhardt M.C.,
    3. Brinson M.M.,
    4. Faser K.E. Jr.

    1999. Application of reference data for assessing and restoring headwater ecosystems. Restoration Ecology 7:241–251.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
43. 1. Rosgen D.L.

    1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22:169–199.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
44. 1. Rzedowski J.

    1978. Vegetación de México. México DF: Limusa.
45. 1. Santana C. E.,
    2. Guzman M.R.,
    3. Jardel P.E.

    1989. The Sierra de Manantlán Biosphere Reserve: The difficult task of becoming a catalyst for regional sustained development. Pages 212–222 in Gregg W.P., Krugman S.L., Wood J.D. (eds), Proceedings of the Symposium on Biosphere Reserves, 4th World Wilderness Congress. Washington DC: USDI National Park Service, Science Publications Office.
46. 1. Secretaría de Desarrollo Social (SEDESOL)

    . 1994. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059–ECOL. Diario Oficial de la Federación. Vol. 988, No. 10. www.sma.df.gob.mx/sma/links/download/archivos/sedesol_nom_059_ecol_1994.pdf
47. 1. Storm L.,
    2. Shebitz D.

    2006. Evaluating the purpose, extent, and ecological restoration applications of indigenous burning practices in southwestern Washington. Ecological Restoration 24:256–268.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
48. 1. Swart J.A.A.,
    2. van der Windt H.J.,
    3. Keulartz J.

    2001. Valuation of nature in conservation and restoration. Restoration Ecology 9:230–238.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
49. 1. Torre-Cuadros M.A.,
    2. Islebe G.A.

    2003. Traditional ecological knowledge and use of vegetation in southeastern Mexico: A case study from Solferino, Quintana Roo. Biodiversity & Conservation 12:2455–2476.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
50. 1. Trejo I.,
    2. Dirzo R.

    2000. Deforestation of seasonally dry tropical forest: A national and local analysis in Mexico. Biological Conservation 94:133–142.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
51. 1. van Diggelen R.,
    2. Grootjans A.P.,
    3. Harris J.A.

    2001. Ecological restoration: State of the art or state of the science? Restoration Ecology 9:115–118.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
52. 1. Vazquez G. J.A.,
    2. Cuevas G. R.,
    3. Cochrane T.S.,
    4. Iltis H.H.,
    5. Santana M. F.J.,
    6. Guzmán H. L.

    1995. Flora de Manantlán: Plantas Vasculares de la Reserva de la Biosfera Sierra de Manantlán. Sida, Botanical Miscellany No. 13. Fort Worth: Botanical Research Institute of Texas.
53. 1. White P.S.,
    2. Walker J.L.

    1997. Approximating nature’s variation: Selecting and using reference information in restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 5:338–349.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
54. 1. Winterhalder K.,
    2. Clewell A.F.,
    3. Aronson J.

    2004. Values and science in ecological restoration—A response to Davis and Slobodkin. Restoration Ecology 12:1–4.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science