Prospects for Disrupting Rhizome Apical Dominance Prior to Chemical Treatment of Phalaris arundinacea

References

1. 1. Annen C.A.

   2004. Will tillage and plant growth regulator pretreatments enhance herbicide effects on reed canarygrass? Proceedings of the North American Prairie Conference 19:171–177.

   OpenUrl
2. 1. Annen C.A.

   2006. Using sethoxydim to control reed canarygrass: Observed effects of additives and field conditions (Wisconsin). Ecological Restoration 24:53.

   OpenUrl
3. 1. Annen C.A.

   2008. Effects of tillage and growth regulator pretreatments on reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) control with sethoxydim. Natural Areas Journal 28:6–13.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. 1. Annen C.A.,
   2. Kirsch E.M.,
   3. Tyser R.W.

   2008. Reed canarygrass invasions alter succession patterns and may reduce habitat quality in wet meadows. Ecological Restoration 26:190–193.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
5. 1. Annen C.A.,
   2. Tyser R.W.,
   3. Kirsch E.M.

   2005. Effects of a selective herbicide, sethoxydim, on reed canarygrass. Ecological Restoration 23:99–102.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
6. 1. Apfelbaum S.I.,
   2. Sams C.E.

   1987. Ecology and control of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.). Natural Areas Journal 7:9–17.

   OpenUrl
7. 1. Bernthal T.W.,
   2. Hatch B.K.

   2008. Mapping Wisconsin wetlands dominated by reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea L.): A landscape-level assessment. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources PUB-WT-900–2008.
8. 1. Bonilla-Warford C.M.,
   2. Zedler J.B.

   2002. Potential for using native plant species in stormwater wetlands. Environmental Management 29:385–394.

   OpenUrlPubMed
9. 1. Brummer J.E.,
   2. Nichols J.T.,
   3. Engel R.K.,
   4. Eskridge K.M.

   1994. Efficiency of different quadrat sizes and shapes for sampling standing crop. Journal of Range Management 47:84–89.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. 1. Cline M.G.

    1991. Apical dominance. Botanical Review 57:318–358.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. 1. Combroux I.C.S.,
    2. Bornetta G.,
    3. Amoros C.

    2002. Plant regeneration strategies after a major disturbance: The case of a riverine wetland restoration. Wetlands 22:234–246.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. 1. Curtis J.T.

    1959. The Vegetation of Wisconsin. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
13. 1. Day R.W.,
    2. Quinn G.P.

    1989. Comparisons of treatments after an analysis of variance in ecology. Ecological Monographs 59:433–463.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. 1. Devine M.D.

    1997. Mechanisms of resistance to acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase inhibitors: A review. Pesticide Science 51:259–264.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. 1. Galatowitsch S.M.,
    2. Whited D.C.,
    3. Lehtinen R.,
    4. Husveth J.,
    5. Schik K.

    2000. The vegetation of wet meadows in relation to their land-use. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 60:121–144.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. 1. Gleason H.A.,
    2. Cronquist A.

    1991. Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada. New York: New York Botanical Garden.
17. 1. Green E.K.,
    2. Galatowitsch S.M.

    2001. Differences in wetland plant community establishment with additions of nitrate-N and invasive species (Phalaris arundinacea and Typha × glauca). Canadian Journal of Botany 79:170–178.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. 1. Harker K.N.,
    2. Dekker J.

    1988. Effects of phenology on translocation patterns of several herbicides in quackgrass, Agropyron repens. Weed Science 36:463–472.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
19. 1. Harker K.N.,
    2. Taylor J.S.

    1994. Chlormequat chloride (CCC) pretreatments may enhance quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) control with sethoxydim. Weed Technology 8:499–507.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
20. 1. Harker K.N.,
    2. Vanden Born W.H.

    1997. Glyphosate or sethoxydim for quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) control in two tillage regimes. Weed Science 45:812–823.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
21. 1. Healy M.T.,
    2. Zedler J.B.

    2010. Setbacks in replacing Phalaris arundinacea monotypes with sedge meadow vegetation. Restoration Ecology 18:155–164.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. 1. Hillman J.R.

    1985. Apical dominance. Pages 127–148 in Wilkins M.B. (ed), Advanced Plant Physiology. London: Pitman Publishing.
23. 1. Holt I.V.

    1954. Initiation and development of the inflorescences of Phalaris arundinacea L. and Dactylis glomerata L. Iowa State College Journal of Science 28:603–621.

    OpenUrl
24. 1. Hovick S.M.,
    2. Reinartz J.A.

    2007. Restoring forest in wetlands dominated by reed canarygrass: The effects of pre-planting treatments on early survival of planted stock. Wetlands 27:1–26.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
25. 1. Kercher S.M.,
    2. Zedler J.B.

    2004. Multiple disturbances accelerate invasion of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) in a mesocosm study. Oecologia 138:455–464.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 1. Kilbride K.M.,
    2. Paveglio F.L.

    1999. Integrated pest management to control reed canarygrass in seasonal wetlands of southwestern Washington. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27:292–297.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
27. 1. Krebs C.J.

    1989. Ecological Methodology. New York: Harper-Collins.
28. 1. Leakey R.B.,
    2. Chancellor R.J.,
    3. Vince-Prue D.

    1975. Parental factors in dominance of lateral buds on rhizomes of Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv. Planta 123:267–274.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 1. Lesica P.,
    2. Martin B.

    2004. Study evaluates methods for controlling reed canarygrass in sedge meadows (Montana). Ecological Restoration 22:227–228.

    OpenUrl
30. 1. MacArthur R.H.

    1965. Patterns of species diversity. Biological Review 40:510–533.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
31. 1. Magurran A.E.

    1988. Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
32. 1. Marquis L.Y.,
    2. Comes R.D.,
    3. Yang C.P.

    1979. Selectivity of glyphosate in creeping red fescue and reed canarygrass. Weed Research 19:335–342.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. 1. Matysiak R.,
    2. Nalewaja J.D.

    1999. Temperature, adjuvants, and UV light affect sethoxydim phytotoxicity. Weed Technology 13:94–99.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
34. 1. Maurer D.A,
    2. Lindig-Cisneros R.,
    3. Werner K.J.,
    4. Kercher S.,
    5. Miller R.,
    6. Zedler J.B.

    2003. The replacement of wetland vegetation by reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea). Ecological Restoration 21:116–119.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
35. 1. McIntyre G.I.

    1971. Apical dominance in the rhizome of Agropyron repens: Some factors affecting the degree of dominance in isolated rhizomes. Canadian Journal of Botany 49:99–109.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
36. 1. Miller R.B.,
    2. Zedler J.B.

    2003. Responses of native and invasive wetland plants to hydroperiod and water depth. Plant Ecology 137:57–69.

    OpenUrl
37. 1. Paveglio F.L.,
    2. Kilbride K.M.

    2000. Response of vegetation to control of reed canarygrass in seasonally managed wetlands of southwestern Washington. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28:730–740.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
38. 1. Preuninger J.S.,
    2. Umbanhowar C.E. Jr.

    1994. Effects of burning, cutting, and spraying on reed canary grass studied (Minnesota). Restoration & Management Notes 12:207.

    OpenUrl
39. 1. Rachich J.,
    2. Reader R.J.

    1999. Interactive effects of herbivory and competition on blue vervain (Verbena hastata L.: Verbenaceae). Wetlands 19:156–161.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
40. 1. Reinhardt C.,
    2. Galatowitsch S.M.

    2004. Best management practices for the invasive Phalaris arundinacea L. (reed canary grass) in wetland restorations. Minnesota Department of Transportation Report No. 2004–36.
41. 1. Reyes C.M.

    2004. The feasibility of using prescribed burning to control reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) populations in Wisconsin wetlands. MS thesis, University of Wisconsin–Madison.
42. 1. Sachs T.

    2002. Developmental processes and the evolution of plant clonality. Evolutionary Ecology 15:485–500.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
43. 1. Sachs T.,
    2. Thimann K.V.

    1967. The role of auxins and cytokinins in the release of buds from apical dominance. American Journal of Botany 45:136–144.

    OpenUrl
44. 1. Shoaf A.R.,
    2. Carlson W.C.

    1992. Stability of sethoxydim and its degradation products in solution, in soil, and on surfaces. Weed Science 40:384–389.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
45. 1. Thompson A.,
    2. Luthin C.

    2004. Wetland Restoration Handbook for Wisconsin Landowners, 2nd ed. Madison: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Bureau of Integrated Science Services.
46. 1. Werner K.J.,
    2. Zedler J.B.

    2002. How sedge meadow soils, microtopography, and vegetation respond to sedimentation. Wetlands 22:451–466.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
47. 1. Wetzel P.R.,
    2. van der Valk A.G.

    1998. Effects of nutrient and soil moisture on competition between Carex stricta, Phalaris arundinacea, and Typha latifolia. Plant Ecology 138:179–190.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
48. 1. Wilcox J.C.

    2004. Challenges of replacing reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) with native species. MS thesis, University of Wisconsin–Madison.
49. 1. Wilcox J.C.,
    2. Healy M.T.,
    3. Zedler J.B.

    2007. Restoring native vegetation to an urban wet meadow dominated by reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) in Wisconsin. Natural Areas Journal 27:354–365.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science