Can Restoration Management Improve Habitat for Insect Pollinators in Ponderosa Pine Forests of the American Southwest?

References

1. 1. Abella S.R.,
   2. Covington W.W.

   2004. Monitoring an Arizona ponderosa pine restoration: Sampling efficiency and multivariate analysis of understory vegetation. Restoration Ecology 12:359–367.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. 1. Alcock J.

   1977. Patrolling and mating by males of Callanthidium illustre (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Southwestern Naturalist 22:554–557.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
3. 1. Allen C.D.,
   2. Savage M.,
   3. Falk D.A.,
   4. Suckling K.F.,
   5. Swetnam T.W.,
   6. et al.

   2002. Ecological restoration of southwestern ponderosa pine ecosystems: A broad perspective. Ecological Applications 12:1418–1433.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. 1. Arneson L.C.,
   2. Tepedino V.J.,
   3. Smith S.L.

   2004. Reproductive success of Baker’s globe mallow and its association with a native specialist bee. Northwest Science 78:141–149.

   OpenUrlWeb of Science
5. 1. Arnett R.H.

   1960. The Beetles of the United States. Washington DC: Catholic University American Press.
6. 1. Arnold J.F.

   1950. Changes in ponderosa pine bunchgrass ranges in northern Arizona resulting from pine regeneration and grazing. Journal of Forestry 48:118–126.

   OpenUrl
7. 1. Axelrod D.I.

   1960. The evolution of flowering plants. Pages 227–305 in Tax S. (ed), The Evolution of Life. Vol. 1 of Evolution after Darwin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

   OpenUrl
8. 1. Ballard W.,
   2. Ballard B.,
   3. Whitlaw H.A.,
   4. Wakeling B.F.,
   5. Brown R.L.,
   6. et al.

   2000. Survival of female elk in Northern Arizona. Journal of Wildlife Management 64:500–504.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. 1. Bjerknes A.-L.,
   2. Totland O.,
   3. Hegland S.J.,
   4. Nielsen A.

   2007. Do alien plant invasions really affect pollination success in native plant species? Biological Conservation 138:1–12.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. 1. Borror D.J.,
    2. DeLong D.M.,
    3. Triplehorn C.A.

    1976. An Introduction to the Study of Insects, 4th ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
11. 1. Bradshaw A.D.

    1987. Restoration: An acid test for ecology. Pages 23–29 in Jordan W.R. III., Gilpin M.E., Aber J.D. (eds), Restoration Ecology: A Synthetic Approach to Ecological Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. 1. Brown B.R.,
    2. Mitchell R.J.,
    3. Graham S.A.

    2002. Competition for pollination between an invasive species (purple loosestrife) and a native congener. Ecology 83:2328–2336.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. 1. Brown J.K.,
    2. Reinhardt E.D.,
    3. Kramer K.A.

    2003. Coarse woody debris: Managing benefits and fire hazard in the recovering forest. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-105.
14. 1. Campbell J.W.,
    2. Hanula J.L.,
    3. Waldrop T.A.

    2007. Effects of prescribed fire and fire surrogates on floral visiting insects of the Blue Ridge province in North Carolina. Biological Conservation 134:393–404.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. 1. Cane J.H.,
    2. Tepedino V.J.

    2001. Causes and extent of declines among native North American invertebrate pollinators: Detection, evidence, and consequences. Conservation Ecology 5:1. www.consecol.org/vol5/iss1/art1

    OpenUrl
16. 1. Casper B.B.

    1983. The efficiency of pollen transfer and rates of embryo initiation in Cryptantha (Boraginaceae). Oecologia 59:262–268.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. 1. Chen Z.K.,
    2. Grady K.,
    3. Stephens S.,
    4. Villa-Castillo J.,
    5. Wagner M.R.

    2006. Fuel reduction treatment and wildfire influence on carabid and tenebrionid community assemblages in the ponderosa pine forest of northern Arizona, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 225:168–177.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. 1. Cooper C.F.

    1960. Changes in vegetation, structure, and growth of southwestern pine forests since white settlement. Ecological Monographs 30:129–164.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. 1. Covington W.W.,
    2. Fulé P.Z.,
    3. Moore M.M.,
    4. Hart S.C.,
    5. Kolb T.E.,
    6. et al.

    1997. Restoring ecosystem health in ponderosa pine forests of the southwest. Journal of Forestry 95:23–29.

    OpenUrl
20. 1. Covington W.W.,
    2. Moore M.M.

    1994. Southwestern ponderosa forest structure: Changes since Euro-American settlement. Journal of Forestry 92:39–47.

    OpenUrl
21. 1. Crawford J.A.,
    2. Wahren C.-H.A.,
    3. Kyle S.,
    4. Moir W.H.

    2001. Responses of exotic plant species to fires in Pinus ponderosa forests in northern Arizona. Journal of Vegetation Science 12:261–268.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. 1. Crisp D.L.

    1996. Monitoring of Penstemon clutei A. Nels. on tornado salvage. Pages 243–246 in Maschinski J., Hammond H.D., Holter L. (eds), Proceedings of the Southwestern rare and endangered plant conference. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-GTR-283.
23. 1. Crosswhite F.S.,
    2. Crosswhite C.D.

    1966. Insect pollination of Penstemon series Graciles (Scrophulariaceae) with notes on Osmia and other Megachilidae. American Midland Naturalist 76:450–467.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. 1. Currie P.O.,
    2. Reichert D.W.,
    3. Malechek J.C.,
    4. Wallmo O.C.

    1977. Forage selection comparisons for mule deer and cattle under managed ponderosa pine. Journal of Range Management 30:352–356.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. 1. Dilley J.D.,
    2. Wilson P.,
    3. Mesler M.R.

    2000. The radiation of Calochortus: Generalist flowers moving through a mosaic of potential pollinators. Oikos 89:209–222.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
26. 1. Dodson E.K.,
    2. Fiedler C.E.

    2006. Impacts of restoration treatments on alien plant invasion in Pinus ponderosa forests, Montana, USA. Journal of Applied Ecology 43:887–897.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
27. 1. Ehrenfeld JG.

    1979. Pollination of three species of Euphorbia subgenus Chamaesyce, with special reference to bees. American Midland Naturalist 101:87–98.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
28. 1. Ferrenberg S.M.,
    2. Schwilk D.W.,
    3. Knapp E.E.,
    4. Groth E.,
    5. Keeley J.E.

    2006. Fire decreases arthropod abundance but increases diversity: Early and late season prescribed fire effects in a Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forest. Fire Ecology 2:79–102.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
29. 1. Fishbein M.,
    2. Venable D.L.

    1996. Diversity and temporal change in the effective pollinators of Asclepias tuberosa. Ecology 77:1061–1073.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. 1. Fleishman E.

    2000. Monitoring the response of butterfly communities to prescribed fire. Environmental Management 26:685–695.

    OpenUrlPubMed
31. 1. Fleishman E.,
    2. MacNally R.,
    3. Murphy D.D.

    2005. Relationship among non-native plants and butterflies, and adequacy of spatial sampling. Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society 85:157–166.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
32. 1. Fontaine C.,
    2. Dajoz I.,
    3. Meriguet J.,
    4. Loreau M.

    2006. Functional diversity of plant-pollinator interaction webs enhances the persistence of plant communities. PLoS Biology 1:129–135.

    OpenUrl
33. 1. Gathmann A.,
    2. Tscharntke T.

    2002. Foraging ranges of solitary bees. Journal of Animal Ecology 71:757–764.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. 1. Gess F.W.,
    2. Gess S.K.

    1993. Effects of increasing land utilization on species representation and diversity of aculeate wasps and bees in the semiarid areas of Southern Africa. Pages 83–113 in LaSalle J., Gauld I.D. (eds), Hymenoptera and Biodiversity. Wallingford UK: CAB International.
35. 1. Ghazoul J.

    2006. Floral diversity and the facilitation of pollination. Journal of Ecology 94:295–304.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
36. 1. Gildar C.N.,
    2. Fulé P.Z.,
    3. Covington W.W.

    2004. Plant community variability in ponderosa pine forest has implications for reference conditions. Natural Areas Journal 24:102–111.

    OpenUrl
37. 1. Goodwin G.

    1984. Observations of Penstemon clutei, Coconino National Forest. Bulletin of the American Penstemon Society 43:26–31.

    OpenUrl
38. 1. Gordon D.M.

    1984. Ecology of bees from coastal dunes, Humboldt County, California. MS thesis, Humboldt State University.
39. 1. Gori D.F.

    1989. Floral color change in Lupinus argenteus (Fabaceae): Why should plants advertise the location of unrewarding flowers to pollinators? Evolution 43:870–881.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
40. 1. Graves S.D.,
    2. Shapiro A.M.

    2002. Exotics as host plants of the California butterfly fauna. Biological Conservation 110:413–433.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
41. 1. Greenleaf S.S.,
    2. Williams N.M.,
    3. Winfree R.,
    4. Kremen C.

    2007. Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size. Oecologia 153:589–596.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
42. 1. Griffis K.L.,
    2. Crawford J.A.,
    3. Wagner M.R.,
    4. Moir M.H.

    2001. Understory response to management treatments in northern Arizona ponderosa pine forests. Forest Ecology and Management 146:239–245.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
43. 1. Haddad N.M.,
    2. Baum K.A.

    1999. An experimental test of corridor effects on butterfly densities. Ecological Applications 9:623–633.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
44. 1. Hall S.P.,
    2. Schweitzer D.F.

    1992. A survey of the moths, butterflies, and grasshoppers of four Nature Conservancy preserves in southeastern North Carolina. Report to the Nature Conservancy, North Carolina Chapter.
45. 1. Handel S.N.

    1997. The role of plantanimal mutualisms in the design and restoration of natural communities. Pages 111–132 in Urbanska K.M., Webb H.R., Edwards P.J. (eds), Restoration Ecology and Sustainable Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. 1. Harris G.R.,
    2. Covington W.W.

    1983. The effect of a prescribed fire on nutrient concentration and standing crop of understory vegetation in ponderosa pine. Canadian Journal of Forest Restoration 13:501–507.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
47. 1. Heinrich B.

    1979. Bumblebee Economics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
48. 1. Hermann S.M.,
    2. Van Hook T.,
    3. Flowers R.W.,
    4. Brennan L.A.,
    5. Glitsenstein J.S.,
    6. et al.

    1998. Fire and biodiversity: Studies in vegetation and arthropods. Pages 384–401 in Wadsworth K.G. (comp), Transactions of the 63rd North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference. Washington DC: Wildlife Management Institute.
49. 1. Herrera C.M.

    1997. Thermal biology and foraging responses of insect pollinators to the forest floor irradiance mosaic. Oikos 78:601–611.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
50. 1. Holechek J.L.,
    2. Vavra M.,
    3. Skovlin J.,
    4. Krueger W.C.

    1982. Cattle diets in the Blue Mountains of Oregon II: Forests. Journal of Range Management 35:239–242.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
51. 1. Horn S.,
    2. Hanula J.L.

    2004. A survey of cavity-nesting bees and wasps in loblolly pine stands of the Savannah River site, Aiken County, South Carolina. Journal of Entomological Science 39:464–469.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
52. 1. Huffman D.W.,
    2. Laughlin D.C.,
    3. Pearson K.M.,
    4. Pandey S.

    2009. Effects of vertebrate herbivores and shrub characteristics on arthropod assemblages in a northern Arizona forest ecosystem. Forest Ecology and Management 258:616–625.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
53. 1. Huffman D.W.,
    2. Moore M.M.

    2003. Ungulate herbivory on buckbrush in an Arizona ponderosa pine forest. Journal of Range Management 56:358–363.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
54. 1. Kearns C.A.

    1992. Anthophilous fly distribution across an elevational gradient. American Midland Naturalist 127:172–182.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
55. 1. Kearns C.A.,
    2. Inouye D.W.

    1994. Fly pollination in Linum lewisii (Linaceae). American Journal of Botany 81:1091–1095.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
56. 1. Kearns C.A.,
    2. Inouye D.W.

    1997. Pollinators, flowering plants, and conservation biology. BioScience 47:297–307.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
57. 1. Keeley J.E.,
    2. McGinnis T.W.

    2007. Impact of prescribed fire and other factors on cheatgrass persistence in a Sierra Nevada ponderosa pine forest. International Journal of Wildland Fire 16:96–106.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
58. 1. Kleintjes P.K.,
    2. Jacobs B.F.,
    3. Fettig S.M.

    2004. Initial response of butterflies to an overstory reduction and slash mulching treatment of a degraded piñon–juniper woodland. Restoration Ecology 12:231–238.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
59. 1. Korb J.E.,
    2. Fulé P.Z.,
    3. Gideon B.

    2007. Different restoration thinning treatments affect level of soil disturbance in ponderosa pine forests of Northern Arizona, USA. Ecological Restoration 25:43–49.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
60. 1. Korb J.E.,
    2. Johnson N.C.,
    3. Covington W.W.

    2004. Slash pile burning effects on soil biotic and chemical properties and plant establishment: Recommendations for amelioration. Restoration Ecology 12:52–62.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
61. 1. Krombein K.V.

    1967. Trap-Nesting Wasps and Bees: Life Histories, Nests and Associates. Washington DC: Smithsonian Press.
62. 1. Lassau A.S.,
    2. Hochuli D.F.,
    3. Cassis G.,
    4. Reid C.A.M.

    2005. Effects of habitat complexity on forest beetle diversity: Do functional groups respond consistently? Diversity and Distributions 11:73–82.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
63. 1. Laughlin D.C.,
    2. Moore M.M.,
    3. Bakker J.D.,
    4. Casey C.A.,
    5. Springer J.D.,
    6. et al.

    2006. Assessing targets for the restoration of herbaceous vegetation in ponderosa pine forests. Restoration Ecology 14:548–560.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
64. 1. Levin D.A.,
    2. Kerster H.W.

    1968. Local gene dispersal in Phlox. Evolution 22:130–139.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
65. 1. Linsley E.G.,
    2. MacSwain J.W.

    1958. The significance of floral constancy among bees of the genus Diadasia (Hymenoptera, Anthophoridae). Evolution 12:219–223.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
66. 1. Loeser M.R.R.,
    2. Sisk T.D.,
    3. Crews T.E.

    2007. Impact of grazing intensity during drought in an Arizona grassland. Conservation Biology 21:87–97.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
67. 1. Loyola R.D.,
    2. Martins R.P.

    2008. Habitat structure components are effective predictors of trap-nesting Hymenoptera diversity. Basic and Applied Ecology 9:735–742.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
68. 1. Mast J.N.,
    2. Fulé P.Z.,
    3. Moore M.M.,
    4. Covington W.W.,
    5. Waltz A.E. M.

    1999. Restoration of presettlement age structure of an Arizona ponderosa pine forest. Ecological Applications 9:228–239.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
69. 1. Mawdsley J.R.

    2003.The importance of species of Dasytinae (Coleoptera: Melyridae) as pollinators in Western North America. Coleopterists Bulletin 57:154–160.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
70. 1. Meyer C.L.,
    2. Sisk T.D.

    2001. Butterfly response to microclimatic conditions following ponderosa pine restoration. Restoration Ecology 9:453–461.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
71. 1. Meyer C.L.,
    2. Sisk T.D.,
    3. Covington W.W.

    2001. Microclimate changes induced by ecological restoration of ponderosa pine forests in northern Arizona. Restoration Ecology 9:443–452.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
72. 1. Michener C.D.

    2000. The Bees of the World. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
73. 1. Milchunas D.G.

    2006. Responses of plant communities to grazing in the southwestern United States. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-169.
74. 1. Moldenke A.R.

    1976. California pollination ecology and vegetation types. Phytologia 34:305–361.

    OpenUrl
75. 1. Moldenke A.R.

    1979. Host-plant coevolution and the diversity of bees in relation to the flora of North America. Phytologia 43:357–419.

    OpenUrl
76. 1. Moldenke A.R.,
    2. Neff J.L.

    1974. The bees of California: A catalogue with special relevance to pollinator and ecological research; Part IV: Andrenidae. International Biological Program Origin and Structure of Ecosystems Technical Report 74–4. Santa Cruz: University of California.
77. 1. Moore M.M.,
    2. Casey C.A.,
    3. Bakker J.D.,
    4. Springer J.D.,
    5. Fulé P.Z.,
    6. et al.

    2006. Herbaceous vegetation responses (1992–2004) to restoration treatments in a ponderosa pine forest. Rangeland Ecology and Management 59:135–144.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
78. 1. Murphy D.D.,
    2. Menninger M.S.,
    3. Ehrlich P.R.

    1984. Nectar source distribution as a determinant of oviposition host species in Euphydryas chalcedona. Oecologia 62:269–271.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
79. 1. National Research Council of the National Academies (NRC)

    . 2007. Status of Pollinators in North America. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
80. 1. Ne’eman G.,
    2. Dafni A.

    1999. Fire, bees and seed production in a Mediterranean key species Salvia fruticosa Miller (Lamiaceae). Israel Journal of Plant Sciences 47:157–163.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
81. 1. Ne’eman G.,
    2. Dafni A.,
    3. Potts S.G.

    2000. The effects of fire on visitation rate and fruit set in four core-species in east Mediterranean scrubland. Plant Ecology 146:97–104.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
82. 1. Neff J.L.,
    2. Simpson B.B.

    1993. Bees, pollination systems and plant diversity. Pages 143–167 in LaSalle J., Gauld I.D. (eds), Hymenoptera and Biodiversity. Wallingford UK: CAB International.
83. 1. Niemelä J.,
    2. Spence J.R.,
    3. Langor D.,
    4. Haila Y.,
    5. Tukia H.

    1993. Logging and boreal ground-beetle assemblages on two continents: Implications for conservation. Pages 29–50 in Gaston K.J., New T.R., Samways M. (eds), Perspectives on Insect Conservation. Andover UK: Intercept.
84. 1. Niwa C.G.,
    2. Sandquist R.E.,
    3. Crawford R.,
    4. Frest T.J.,
    5. Griswold T.,
    6. et al.

    2001. Invertebrates of the Columbia River Basin assessment area. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-512.
85. 1. Nyoka S.E.

    2004. The effects of exotic plants on the diversity and abundance of bees in the Humboldt Bay dune system. MS thesis, Humboldt State University.
86. 1. O’Brien M. H.

    1980.The pollination biology of a pavement plain: Pollinator visitation patterns. Oecologia 47:213–218.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
87. 1. Paige K.N.,
    2. Whitham T.G.

    1987. Overcompensation in response to mammalian herbivory: The advantage of being eaten. American Naturalist 129:407–416.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
88. 1. Panzer R.

    1988. Managing prairie remnants for insect conservation. Natural Areas Journal 8:83–90.

    OpenUrl
89. 1. Patton D.R.

    1974. Patch cutting increases deer and elk use of a pine forest in Arizona. Journal of Forestry 72:764–766.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
90. 1. Petanidou T.,
    2. Ellis W.N.

    1996. Interdependence of native bee faunas and floras in changing Mediterranean communities. Pages 201–226 in Matheson A., Buchmann S.L., O’Toole R., Westrich P., Williams I.H. (eds), The Conservation of Bees. London: Academic Press.
91. 1. Potts S.G.,
    2. Petanidou T.,
    3. Roberts S.,
    4. O’Toole C.,
    5. Hulbert A.,
    6. Willmer P.

    2006. Plant-pollinator biodiversity and pollination services in complex Mediterranean landscape. Biological Conservation 129:519–529.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
92. 1. Potts S.G.,
    2. Vulliamy B.,
    3. Dafni A.,
    4. Ne’eman G.,
    5. O’Toole C.,
    6. et al.

    2003a. Response of pollinator communities to fire: Changes in diversity, abundance and floral reward structure. Oikos 101:103–112.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
93. 1. Potts S.G.,
    2. Vulliamy B.,
    3. Dafni A.,
    4. Ne’eman G.,
    5. Willmer P.

    2003b. Linking bees and flowers: How do floral communities structure pollinator communities? Ecology 84:2626–2642.

    OpenUrl
94. 1. Potts S.G.,
    2. Vulliamy B.,
    3. Roberts S.,
    4. O’Toole C.,
    5. Dafni A.,
    6. Ne’Eman G.,
    7. Willmer P.

    2005. Role of nesting resources in organising diverse bee communities in a Mediterranean landscape. Ecological Entomology 30:78–85.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
95. 1. Proctor M.,
    2. Yeo P.,
    3. Lack A.

    1996. The Natural History of Pollination. Portland OR: Timber Press.
96. 1. Rambo J.L.,
    2. Faeth S.H.

    1999. Effect of vertebrate grazing on plant and insect community structure. Conservation Biology 13:1047–1054.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
97. 1. Rasmussen D.I.

    1941. Biotic communities of Kaibab Plateau, Arizona. Ecological Monographs 11:230–275.

    OpenUrl
98. 1. Raven P.

    1979. A survey of reproductive biology of Onagraceae. New Zealand Journal of Botany 17:575–593.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
99. 1. Reemer M.

    2005. Saproxylic hoverflies benefit by modern forest management. (Diptera: Syrphidae). Journal of Insect Conservation 9:49–59.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
100. 1. Rosenstock S.S.

     1996. Shrub-grassland small mammal and vegetation responses to rest from grazing. Journal of Range Management 49:199–203.

     OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
101. 1. Sandoval L.,
     2. Holechek J.,
     3. Biggs J.,
     4. Valdez R.,
     5. VanLeeuwen D.

     2005. Elk and mule deer diets in North-Central New Mexico. Rangeland Ecology and Management 58:366–372.

     OpenUrlCrossRef
102. 1. Severson K.E.,
     2. Medina A.L.

     1983. Deer and elk habitat management in the Southwest. Journal of Range Management Monographs No. 2.
103. 1. Shepherd M.,
     2. Buchmann S.L.,
     3. Vaughan M.,
     4. Black S.H.

     2003. Pollinator Conservation Handbook: A Guide to Understanding, Protecting, and Providing Habitat for Native Pollinator Insects. Portland OR: The Xerces Society.
104. 1. Short C.,
     2. Negrón J.F.

     2003. Arthropod responses: A functional approach. Pages 286–305 in Friederici P. (ed), Ecological Restoration of Southwestern Ponderosa Pine Forests. Washington DC: Island Press.
105. 1. Sieg C.H.,
     2. Phillips B.G.,
     3. Moser L.P.

     2003. Exotic invasive plants. Pages 251–267 in Friederici P. (ed), Ecological Restoration of Southwestern Ponderosa Pine Forests. Washington DC: Island Press.
106. 1. Smith D.R.

     1967. Effects of cattle grazing on a ponderosa pine bunchgrass range in Colorado. USDA Forest Service Technical Bulletin 1371.
107. 1. Society for Ecological Restoration International Science & Policy Working Group (SER)

     . 2004. The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration. Tucson: Society for Ecological Restoration International. www.ser.org/content/ecological_restoration_primer.asp
108. 1. Steffan-Dewenter I.,
     2. Muenzenberg U.,
     3. Buerger C.,
     4. Thies C.,
     5. Tscharntke T.

     2002. Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. Ecology 83:1421–1432.

     OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
109. 1. Steffan-Dewenter I.,
     2. Tscharntke T.

     1999. Effects of habitat isolation on pollinator communities and seed set. Oecologia 121:432–440.

     OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
110. 1. Stephen W.P.,
     2. Bohart G.E.,
     3. Torchio P.F.

     1969. The Biology and External Morphology of Bees, with a Synopsis of Genera of Northwestern America. Corvallis: Agricultural Experiment Station, Oregon State University.
111. 1. Stoddard M.T.,
     2. McGlone C.M.,
     3. Fulé P.Z.,
     4. Laughlin D.C.,
     5. Daniels M.L.

     2010. Native plants dominate Pinus ponderosa forest restoration project regardless of thinning intensity or soil disturbance in northern Arizona, USA. Unpublished manuscript in review.
112. 1. Sugden E.A.

     1985. Pollinators of Astragalus monoensis Barneby (Fabaceae): New host records; Potential impact of sheep grazing. Great Basin Naturalist 45:299–312.

     OpenUrlWeb of Science
113. 1. Swengel A.B.

     2001. A literature review of insect responses to fire, compared to other conservation managements of open habitat. Biodiversity and Conservation 10:1141–1169.

     OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
114. 1. Tepedino V.J.

     1989. Notes on the reproductive biology of Zigadenus paniculatus, a toxic range plant. Great Basin Naturalist 41:427–430.

     OpenUrl
115. 1. Tepedino V.J.,
     2. Bradley B.A.,
     3. Griswold T.L.

     2008. Might flowers of invasive plants increase native bee carrying capacity? Intimations from Capitol Reef National Park, Utah. Natural Areas Journal 28:44–50.

     OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
116. 1. Traveset A.,
     2. Richardson D.M.

     2006. Biological invasions as disruptors of plant reproductive mutualisms. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21:208–216.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
117. 1. Truett J.

     1996. Bison and elk in the American Southwest: In search of the pristine. Environmental Management 20:195–206.

     OpenUrlWeb of Science
118. 1. Villa-Castillo J.,
     2. Wagner M.R.

     2002. Ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) species assemblage as an indicator of forest condition in northern Arizona ponderosa pine forest. Environmental Entomology 31:242–252.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
119. 1. Visscher K.,
     2. Seeley T.D.

     1982. Foraging strategy of honeybee colonies in a temperate deciduous forest. Ecology 63:1790–1801.

     OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
120. 1. Waltz A.E.M.,
     2. Covington W.W.

     2001. Butterfly response and successional change following ecosystem restoration. Pages 88–94 in Vance R.K., Edminster C.B., Covington W.W., Blake J.A. (comps), Ponderosa pine ecosystems restoration and conservation: Steps toward stewardship; 2000 April 25–27; Flagstaff, AZ. USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-22.
121. 1. Waltz A.E.M.,
     2. Covington W.W.

     2004. Ecological restoration treatments increase butterfly richness and abundance: Mechanisms of response. Restoration Ecology 12:85–96.

     OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
122. 1. Westerling A.L.,
     2. Hidalgo H.G.,
     3. Cyan D.R.,
     4. Swetnam T.W.

     2006. Warming and earlier spring increase western U.S. forest wildfire activity. Science 313:940–943.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
123. 1. Westrich P.

     1996. Habitat requirements of central European bees and the problems with partial habitats. Pages 1–16 in Matheson A., Buchmann A.L., O’Toole C., Westrich P., Williams I.H. (eds), The Conservation of Bees. London: Harcourt Brace.
124. 1. Williamson J.R.,
     2. Neilsen W.A.

     2000. The influence of forest site on rate and extent of soil compaction and profile disturbance of skid trails during ground-based harvesting. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30:1196–1205.

     OpenUrlCrossRef
125. 1. Wilson P.,
     2. Castellanos M.C.,
     3. Hogue J.N.,
     4. Thomson J.D.,
     5. Armbruster S.

     2004. A multivariate search for pollination syndromes among penstemons. Oikos 104:345–361.

     OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science