New Models for Ecosystem Dynamics and Restoration Richard J. Hobbs Katharine Suding, editors. 2008. Washington DC: Island Press. Cloth, $90. ISBN: 978-1-59726-184-5. Paper, $50. IS BN: 978-1-59726-185-2. 366 pages.

References

1. 1. Barry D.,
   2. Sitton S.

   2004. How restoration techniques affect dominant flora of blackland prairie. Ecological Restoration 22: 131–132.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
2. 1. Bradshaw A.D.

   1987. The reclamation of derelict land and the ecology of ecosystems. Pages 53–74 in Jordan W.R. III., Gilpin M.E., Aber J.D. (eds), Restoration Ecology: A Synthetic Approach to Ecological Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. 1. Choi Y.D.

   2007. Restoration ecology to the future: A call for a new paradigm. Restoration Ecology 15:351–353.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. 1. Fischenich J.C.

   2008. The application of conceptual models to ecosystem restoration. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Technical Note ERDC TN-EMRRP-EBA-01. el.erdc.usace.army.mil/ elpubs/pdf/eba08-1.pdf
5. 1. Henderson J.E.,
   2. O’Neil L.J.

   2004. Conceptual models to support environmental planning and operations. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Technical Note ERDC/TN SMART-04-09. el.erdc.usace.army.mil/elpubs/pdf/smart04-9.pdf
6. 1. Henderson J.E.

   2007a. Template for conceptual model construction: Model review and Corps applications. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Technical Note ERDC/TN-SWWRP-07-4.el.erdc.usace.army.mil/elpubs/pdf/swwrp-07-4.pdf
7. 1. Henderson J.E.

   2007b. Template for conceptual model construction: Model components and application of the template. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Technical Note ERDC/TN-SWWRP-07-7.el.erdc.usace.army.mil/elpubs/pdf/swwrp-07-7.pdf
8. 1. Miao S.,
   2. Carstenn S.,
   3. Nungesser M.

   , eds. 2009. Real World Ecology: Large-Scale and Long-Term Case Studies and Methods. New York: Springer.
9. 1. Sand-Jensen K.

   2007. How to write consistently boring scientific literature. Oikos 116:723–727.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. 1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)

    . 2006. Environmental benefits and performance measures: Defining national ecosystem restoration and how to measure its achievement. Discussion paper by the Chief of Engineers Environmental Advisory Board. www.usace.army.mil/CECW/Documents/eab/ebpm_mar07.pdf
11. 1. Woodward A.,
    2. Schreiner E.G.,
    3. Crain P.,
    4. Brenkman S.J.,
    5. Happe et al P.J.

    2008. Conceptual models for research and monitoring of Elwha dam removal—management perspective. Northwest Science 82 (Special Issue):59–71.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science