Identifying Land Manager Objectives and Alternatives for Mixed-Pine Forest Ecosystem Management and Restoration in Eastern Upper Michigan

References

1. 1. Absher J.D.,
   2. Vaske J.J.

   2007. Examining the sources of public support for wildland fire policies. Fire Management Today 67:35–39.

   OpenUrl
2. 1. Alhakami A.S.,
   2. Slovic P.

   1994. A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. Risk Analysis 14: 1085–1096.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 1. Arvai J.L.,
   2. Gregory R.,
   3. Ohlson D.,
   4. Blackwell B.,
   5. Gray R.

   2006. Letdowns, wake-up calls, and constructed preferences: People’s responses to fuel and wildfire risks. Journal of Forestry 104: 173–181.

   OpenUrlWeb of Science
4. 1. Baron J.,
   2. Spranca M.

   1997. Protected values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 70:1–16.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. 1. Bergeron Y.,
   2. Brisson J.

   1990. Fire regime in red pine stands at the northern limit of the species range. Ecology 71:1352–1364.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. 1. Bonazountas M.,
   2. Kallidromitou D.,
   3. Kassomenos P.,
   4. Passas N.

   2007. A decision support system for managing forest fire casualties. Journal of Environmental Management 84:412–418.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 1. Bowker J.M.,
   2. Lim S.H.,
   3. Cordell K.,
   4. Green G.T.,
   5. Rideout-Hanzak S.,
   6. Johnson C.Y.

   2008. Wildland fire, risk, and recovery: Results of a national survey with regional and racial perspectives. Journal of Forestry 106:268–276.

   OpenUrlWeb of Science
8. 1. Bright A.D.,
   2. Newman P.,
   3. Carroll J.

   2007. Context, beliefs, and attitudes toward wildland fire management: An examination of residents of the wildland-urban interface. Human Ecology Review 14:212–222.

   OpenUrlWeb of Science
9. 1. Christensen J.

   2003. Auditing conservation in an age of accountability. Conservation in Practice 4:12–19.

   OpenUrl
10. 1. Cleland D.T.,
    2. Crow T.R.,
    3. Saunders S.C.,
    4. Dickmann D.I.,
    5. Maclean A.L.,
    6. et al

    . 2004. Characterizing historical and modern fire regimes in Michigan (USA): A landscape ecosystem approach. Landscape Ecology 19:311–325.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. 1. Corace R.G. III.,
    2. Goebel P.C.,
    3. Hix D.M.,
    4. Casselman T.,
    5. Seefelt N.E.

    Forthcoming. Applying principles of ecological forestry at National Wildlife Refuges: Experiences from Seney National Wildlife Refuge and Kirtland’s Warbler Wildlife Management Area. The Forestry Chronicle 85.
12. 1. Corace R.G. III.,
    2. Goebel P.C.,
    3. Seefelt N.E.

    2008. Innovative forest management: Seney National Wildlife Refuge and Kirtland’s Warber Wildlife Management Area. Forest Wisdom 9: 4,10.

    OpenUrl
13. 1. Drobyshev I.,
    2. Goebel P.C.,
    3. Hix D.M.,
    4. Corace R.G. III.,
    5. Semko-Duncan M.E.

    2008a. Interactions among forest composition, structure, fuel loadings and fire history: A case study of red pine-dominated forests of Seney National Wildlife Refuge, Upper Michigan. Forest Ecology and Management 256:1723–1733.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. 1. Drobyshev I.

    2008b. Pre- and post-European settlement fire history of red pine dominated forest ecosystems of Seney National Wildlife Refuge, Upper Michigan. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 38: 2497–2514.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. 1. Gilmore D.W.,
    2. Palik B.J.

    2006. A revised managers handbook for red pine in the North Central Region. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NC-264.
16. 1. Gregory R.

    2000. Using stakeholder values to make smarter environmental decisions. Environment 42:34–44.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
17. 1. Hammond J.S.,
    2. Keeney R.L.,
    3. Raiffa H.

    1999. Smart Choices: A Practical Guide to Making Better Decisions. Boston MA: Harvard Business School Press.
18. 1. Heinselman M.L.

    1973. Fire in the virgin forests of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area, Minnesota. Quaternary Research 3:329–382.

    OpenUrl
19. 1. Hessburg P.F.,
    2. Reynolds K.M.,
    3. Keane R.E.,
    4. James K.M.,
    5. Salter R.B.

    2007. Evaluating wildland fire danger and prioritizing vegetation and fuels treatments. Forest Ecology and Management 247: 1–17.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. 1. Holden Z.A.,
    2. Morgan P.,
    3. Rollins M.G.,
    4. Kavanagh K.

    2007. Effects of multiple wildland fires on ponderosa pine stand structure in two southwestern wilderness areas, USA. Fire Ecology 3:18–33.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
21. 1. Kaloudis S.,
    2. Costopoulou C.I.,
    3. Lorentzos N.A.,
    4. Sideridis A.B.,
    5. Karteris M.

    2008. Design of forest management planning DSS for wildfire risk reduction. Ecological Informatics 3: 122–133.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. 1. Keeney R

    . 1992. Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
23. 1. Lombard M.,
    2. Snyder-Duch J.,
    3. Bracken C.C.

    2002. Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research 28:587–604.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. 1. Maguire L.A.,
    2. Albright E.A.

    2005. Can behavioral decision theory explain riskaverse fire management decisions? Forest Ecology and Management 211:47–58.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. National Research Council. 1996. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
26. 1. Ohlson D.,
    2. Berry T.M.,
    3. Gray R.W.,
    4. Blackwell B.A.,
    5. Hawkes B.C.

    2006. Multi-attribute evaluation of landscape- level fuel management to reduce wildfire risk. Forest Policy and Economics 8:824–837.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
27. 1. Palik B.J.,
    2. Zasada J.C.

    2003. An ecological context for regenerating multicohort, mixed-species red pine forests. USDA Forest Service Research Note NC-382.
28. 1. Pilon J.

    ed. 2006. Guidelines for red pine management based on ecosystem management principles for state forestland in Michigan. Michigan Department of Natural Resources. www.michigan.gov/documents/Red-Pine-Lite_96501_7.pdf
29. 1. Schulte L.A.,
    2. Mladenoff D.J.,
    3. Crow T.R.,
    4. Merrick L.C.,
    5. Cleland D.T.

    2007. Homogenization of northern U.S. Great Lakes forests due to land use. Landscape Ecology 22:1089–1103.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. 1. Stankey G.H.,
    2. Bormann B.T.,
    3. Ryan C.,
    4. Schindler B.,
    5. Sturtevant V.,
    6. et al

    . 2003. Adaptive management and the Northwest Forest Plan: Rhetoric and reality. Journal of Forestry 101:40–46.

    OpenUrl
31. 1. Tetlock P.E.,
    2. Kristel O.V.,
    3. Elson S.B.,
    4. Green M.C.,
    5. Lerner J.

    2000. The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78: 853–870.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 1. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)

    . 2008. Wildland fire management plan: Seney National Wildlife Refuge. Fort Snelling MN: USFWS Regional Office.
33. 1. Van Wagtendonk J.W.

    2007. The history and evolution of wildland fire use. Fire Ecology 3:3–17.

    OpenUrl
34. 1. Whitney G.G.

    1986. Relation of Michigan’s presettlement forests to substrate and disturbance history. Ecology 67: 1548–1559.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
35. 1. Zaksek M.,
    2. Arvai J.L.

    2004. Toward improved communication about wildland fire: Mental models research to identify information needs for natural resource management. Risk Analysis 24: 1503–1514.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science