Why Climate Change Makes Riparian Restoration More Important than Ever: Recommendations for Practice and Research

References

1. 1. Ahearn D.S.,
   2. Viers J.H.,
   3. Mount J.F.,
   4. Dahlgren R.A.

   2006. Priming the productivity pump: Flood pulse driven trends in suspended algal biomass distribution across a restored floodplain. Freshwater Biology 51:1417–1433.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. 1. Ahlering M.A.,
   2. Faaborg J.

   2006. Avian habitat management meets conspecific attraction: If you build it, will they come? Auk 123:301–312.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Alcamo J.,
   2. Florke M.,
   3. Marker M.

   2007. Future long-term changes in global water resources driven by socioeconomic and climatic changes. Hydrological Sciences Journal 52:247–275.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. 1. Alpert P.,
   2. Griggs F.T.,
   3. Peterson D.R.

   1999. Riparian forest restoration along large rivers: Initial results from the Sacramento River Project. Restoration Ecology 7:360–368.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. 1. Bakker E.S.

   1984. An Island Called California: An Ecological Introduction to its Natural Communities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6. 1. Barnett T.P.,
   2. Adam J.C.,
   3. Lettenmaier D.P.

   2005. Potential impacts of a warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions. Nature 438:303–309.

   OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 1. Battin J.,
   2. Wiley M.W.,
   3. Ruckelshaus M.H.,
   4. Palmer R.N.,
   5. Korb E.,
   6. et al.

   2007. Projected impacts of climate change on salmon habitat restoration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104:6720–6725.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
8. 1. Bélisle M,
   2. St. Clair C.C.

   2001. Cumulative effects of barriers on the movements of forest birds. Ecology & Society 5(2):9. www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol5/iss2/art9

   OpenUrl
9. 1. Bernhardt E.S.,
   2. Palmer M.A.,
   3. Allan J.D.,
   4. Alexander G.,
   5. Barnas K.,
   6. et al.

   2005. Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts. Science 308:636–637.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
10. 1. Booth E.,
    2. Mount J.,
    3. Viers J.H.

    2006. Hydrologic variability of the Cosumnes River floodplain. San Francisco Estuary & Watershed Science 4(2):2. repositories.cdlib.org/jmie/sfews/vol4/iss2/art2/

    OpenUrl
11. 1. Both C.,
    2. Visser M.E.

    2001. Adjustment to climate change is constrained by arrival date in a long-distance migrant bird. Nature 411:296–298.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 1. Boulton A.J.,
    2. Hancock P.J.

    2006. Rivers as groundwater-dependent ecosystems: A review of degrees of dependency, riverine processes and management implications. Australian Journal of Botany 54:133–144.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. 1. Bower A.D.,
    2. Aitken S.N.

    2008. Ecological genetics and seed transfer guidelines for Pinus albicaulis (Pinaceae). American Journal of Botany 95:66–76.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
14. 1. Brauman K.A.,
    2. Daily G.C.,
    3. Duarte T.K.,
    4. Mooney H.A.

    2007. The nature and value of ecosystem services: An overview highlighting hydrologic services. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 32:67–98.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. 1. Bunn D.,
    2. Mummert A.,
    3. Hoshovsky M.,
    4. Gilardi K.,
    5. Shanks S.

    2007. California wildlife: Conservation challenges; California’s wildlife action plan. Sacramento: California Department of Fish and Game.
16. 1. Cassie D.

    2006. The thermal regime of rivers: A review. Freshwater Biology 51: 1389–1406.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. 1. Choi Y.D.,
    2. Temperton V.M.,
    3. Allen E.B.,
    4. Grootjans A.P.,
    5. Halassy M.,
    6. et al.

    2008. Ecological restoration for future sustainability in a changing environment. Ecoscience 15:53–64.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. 1. Chu C.,
    2. Jones N.E.,
    3. Mandrak N.E.,
    4. Piggott A.R.,
    5. Minns C.K.

    2008. The influence of air temperature, ground-water discharge, and climate change on the thermal diversity of stream fishes in southern Ontario watersheds. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 65:297–308.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. 1. Collinge S.K.,
    2. Holyoak M.,
    3. Barr C.B.,
    4. Marty J.T.

    2001. Riparian habitat fragmentation and population persistence of the threatened valley elderberry longhorn beetle in central California. Biological Conservation 100:103–113.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. 1. Cowling R.M.,
    2. Pressey R.L.

    2001. Rapid plant diversification: Planning for an evolutionary future. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98: 5452–5457.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
21. 1. Easterling D.R.,
    2. Meehl G.A.,
    3. Parmesan C.,
    4. Changnon S.A.,
    5. Karl T.R.,
    6. Mearns L.O.

    2000. Climate extremes: Observations, modeling, and impacts. Science 289:2068–2074.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
22. 1. Fleckenstein J.,
    2. Anderson M.,
    3. Fogg G.,
    4. Mount J.

    2004. Managing surface water-groundwater to restore fall flows in the Cosumnes River. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 130:301–310.

    OpenUrlGeoRef
23. 1. Florsheim J.L.,
    2. Mount J.F.

    2002. Restoration of floodplain topography by sand-splay complex formation in response to intentional levee breaches, Lower Cosumnes River, California. Geomorphology 44:67–94.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
24. 1. Fulé P.Z.

    2008. Does it make sense to restore wildland fire in changing climate? Restoration Ecology 16:526–531.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. 1. Gardali T.,
    2. Holmes A.L.,
    3. Small S.L.,
    4. Nur N.,
    5. Geupel G.R.,
    6. Golet G.H.

    2006. Abundance patterns of landbirds in restored and remnant riparian forests on the Sacramento River, California, USA. Restoration Ecology 14:391–403.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
26. 1. Gergel S.E.,
    2. Dixon M.D.,
    3. Turner M.G.

    2002. Consequences of human-altered floods: Levees, floods, and floodplain forests along the Wisconsin River. Ecological Applications 12:1755–1770.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
27. 1. Golet G.H.,
    2. Gardali T.,
    3. Howell C.A.,
    4. Hunt J.,
    5. Luster R.A.,
    6. et al.

    2008. Wildlife response to riparian restoration on the Sacramento River. San Francisco Estuary & Watershed Science 6(2):1. repositories.cdlib.org/jmie/sfews/vol6/iss2/art1/

    OpenUrl
28. 1. Golet G.H.,
    2. Roberts M.D.,
    3. Luster R.A.,
    4. Werner G.,
    5. Larsen E.W.,
    6. et al.

    2006. Assessing societal impacts when planning restoration of large alluvial rivers: A case study of the Sacramento River project, California. Environmental Management 37:862–879.

    OpenUrlPubMed
29. 1. Grindal S.D.,
    2. Morissette J.L.,
    3. Brigham R.M.

    1999. Concentration of bat activity in riparian habitats over an elevational gradient. Canadian Journal of Zoology 77:972–977.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. 1. Gunderson L.H.

    2000. Ecological resilience—in theory and application. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31:425–439.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
31. 1. Hansen L.J.,
    2. Biringer J.L.,
    3. Hoffman J.R.

    , eds. 2003. Buying Time: A User’s Manual for Building Resistance and Resilience to Climate Change in Natural Systems. Washington DC: World Wildlife Fund.
32. 1. Harris J.A.,
    2. Hobbs R.J.,
    3. Higgs E.,
    4. Aronson J.

    2006. Ecological restoration and global climate change. Restoration Ecology 14:170–176.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. 1. Hayhoe K.,
    2. Cayan D.,
    3. Field C.B.,
    4. Frumhoff P.C.,
    5. Maurer E.P.,
    6. et al.

    2004. Emissions pathways, climate change, and impacts on California. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101: 12422–12427.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
34. 1. Heller N.E.,
    2. Zavaleta E.S.

    2008. Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: A review of 22 years of recommendations. Biological Conservation 142:14–32.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
35. 1. Hilty J.A.,
    2. Merenlender A.M.

    2004. Use of riparian corridors and vineyards by mammalian predators in northern California. Conservation Biology 18: 126–135.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
36. 1. Hufford K.M.,
    2. Mazer S.J.

    2003. Plant ecotypes: Genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18:147–155.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
37. 1. Hughes F.M.R.,
    2. Colston A.,
    3. Mountford J.O.

    2005. Restoring riparian ecosystems: The challenge of accommodating variability and designing restoration trajectories. Ecology & Society 10(1):12. www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art12/

    OpenUrl
38. 1. Inouye D.W.

    2008. Effects of climate change on phenology, frost damage, and floral abundance of montane wild-flowers. Ecology 89:353–362.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. 1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)

    2007a. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. 1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)

    2007b. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41. 1. Jeffres C.A.,
    2. Opperman J.J.,
    3. Moyle P.B

    2008. Ephemeral floodplain habitats provide best growth conditions for juvenile Chinook salmon in a California river. Environmental Biology of Fishes 83:449–458.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
42. 1. Katibah E.F.

    1984. A brief history of riparian forests in the Central Valley of California. Pages 23–29 in Warner R.E., Hendrix K.M. (eds), California Riparian Systems: Ecology, Conservation, and Productive Management. Berkeley: University of California Press.
43. 1. Knopf F.L.,
    2. Johnson R.R.,
    3. Rich T.,
    4. Samson F.B.,
    5. Szaro R.C.

    1988. Conservation of riparian ecosystems in the United States. Wilson Bulletin 100: 272–284.

    OpenUrl
44. 1. Kondolf G.M.,
    2. Boulton A.J.,
    3. O’Daniel S.,
    4. Poole G.C.,
    5. Rahel F.J.,
    6. et al.

    2006. Process-based ecological river restoration: Visualizing three-dimensional connectivity and dynamic vectors to recover lost-linkages. Ecology & Society 11(2):5. www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art5/

    OpenUrl
45. 1. Langpap C.

    2006. Conservation of endangered species: Can incentives work for private landowners? Ecological Economics 57:558–572.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
46. 1. Machtans C.S.,
    2. Villard M.A.,
    3. Hannon S.J.

    1996. Use of riparian buffer strips as movement corridors by forest birds. Conservation Biology 10: 1366–1379.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
47. 1. McCullough D.A.,
    2. Spalding S.,
    3. Sturdevant D.,
    4. Hicks M.

    2001. Summary of technical literature examining the physiological effects of temperature on salmonids: Issue paper 5. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Report USEPA-910-D-01-005.
48. 1. Meave J.,
    2. Kellman M.

    1994. Maintenance of rain forest diversity in riparian forests of tropical savannas: Implications for species conservation during Pleistocene drought. Journal of Biogeography 21:121–135.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
49. 1. Merz J.E.,
    2. Moyle P.B.

    2006. Salmon, wildlife, and wine: Marine-derived nutrients in human-dominated ecosystems of central California. Ecological Applications 16:999–1009.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
50. 1. Meyer J.L.,
    2. Sale M.J.,
    3. Mulholland P.J.,
    4. Poff N.L.

    1999. Impacts of climate change on aquatic ecosystem functioning and health. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 35: 1373–1386.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
51. 1. Millar C.I.,
    2. Stephenson N.L.,
    3. Stephens S.L.

    2007. Climate change and forests of the future: Managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecological Applications 17:2145–2151.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
52. 1. Milly P.C.D.,
    2. Betancourt J.,
    3. Falkenmark M.,
    4. Hirsch R.M.,
    5. Kundzewicz Z.W.,
    6. et al.

    2008. Stationarity is dead: Whither water management? Science 319:573–574.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
53. 1. Milly P.C.D.,
    2. Wetherald R.T.,
    3. Dunne K.A.,
    4. Delworth T.L.

    2002. Increasing risk of great floods in a changing climate. Nature 415:514–517.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
54. 1. Naiman R.J.,
    2. Bilby R.E.,
    3. Bisson P.A.

    2000. Riparian ecology and management in the Pacific coastal rain forest. Bioscience 50:996–1011.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
55. 1. Naiman R.J.,
    2. Decamps H.

    1997. The ecology of interfaces: Riparian zones. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28:621–658.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
56. 1. Naiman R.J.,
    2. Decamps H.,
    3. Pollock M.

    1993. The role of riparian corridors in maintaining regional biodiversity. Ecological Applications 3:209–212.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
57. 1. National Research Council

    2002. Riparian Areas: Functions and Strategies for Management. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
58. 1. Nelson K.C.,
    2. Palmer M.A.

    2007. Stream temperature surges under urbanization and climate change: Data, models, and responses. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 43: 440–452.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
59. 1. Norton D.A.

    2000. Conservation biology and private land: Shifting the focus. Conservation Biology 14:1221.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
60. 1. O’Donnell T.K.,
    2. Galat D.L.

    2008. Evaluating success criteria and project monitoring in river enhancement within an adaptive management framework. Environmental Management 41:90–105.

    OpenUrlPubMed
61. 1. Palmer M.A.,
    2. Liermann C.A.R.,
    3. Nilsson C.,
    4. Florke M.,
    5. Alcamo J.,
    6. et al.

    2008. Climate change and the world’s river basins: Anticipating management options. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6: 81–89.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
62. 1. Parmesan C.

    2007. Influences of species, latitudes and methodologies on estimates of phenological response to global warming. Global Change Biology 13:1860–1872.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
63. 1. Poff N.L.

    2002. Ecological response to and management of increased flooding caused by climate change. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A 360:1497–1510.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
64. 1. Rice K.J.,
    2. Emery N.C.

    2003. Managing microevolution: Restoration in the face of global change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1:469–478.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
65. 1. Richter B.,
    2. Baumgartner J.,
    3. Wingington R.,
    4. Braun D.

    1997. How much water does a river need? Freshwater Biology 37:231–249.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
66. 1. Rosenzweig C.,
    2. Karoly D.,
    3. Vicarelli M.,
    4. Neofotis P.,
    5. Wu Q.,
    6. et al.

    2008. Attributing physical and biological impacts to anthropogenic climate change. Nature 453:353–357.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
67. 1. Roux D.J.,
    2. Rogers K.H.,
    3. Biggs H.C.,
    4. Ashton P.J.,
    5. Sergeant A.

    2006. Bridging the science-management divide: Moving from unidirectional knowledge transfer to knowledge interfacing and sharing. Ecology & Society 11(1):4. www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art4/

    OpenUrl
68. 1. Scheffer M.,
    2. Carpenter S.,
    3. Foley J.A.,
    4. Folke C.,
    5. Walker B.

    2001. Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413:591–596.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
69. 1. Seager R.,
    2. Ting M.F.,
    3. Held I.,
    4. Kushnir Y.,
    5. Lu J.,
    6. et al.

    2007. Model projections of an imminent transition to a more arid climate in southwestern North America. Science 316:1181–1184.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
70. 1. Seastedt T.R.,
    2. Hobbs R.J.,
    3. Suding K.N.

    2008. Management of novel ecosystems: Are novel approaches required? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6: 547–553.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
71. 1. Smulders M.J.M.,
    2. Cottrell J.E.,
    3. Lefèvre F.,
    4. van der Schoot J.,
    5. Arens P.,
    6. et al.

    2008. Structure of the genetic diversity in black poplar (Populus nigra L.) populations across European river systems: Consequences for conservation and restoration. Forest Ecology and Management 255:1388–1399.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
72. 1. Solomon S.,
    2. Plattner G.,
    3. Knutti R.,
    4. Friedlingstein P.

    2009. Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106:1704–1709.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
73. 1. Sommer T.,
    2. Harrell B.,
    3. Nobriga M.,
    4. Brown R.,
    5. Moyle P.,
    6. et al.

    2001. California’s Yollo Bypass: Evidence that flood control can be compatible with fisheries, wetlands, wildlife, and agriculture. Fisheries 26:6–16.

    OpenUrl
74. 1. Sridhar V.,
    2. Sansone A.L.,
    3. LaMarche J.,
    4. Dubin T.,
    5. Lettenmaier D.P.

    2004. Prediction of stream temperature in forested watersheds. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 40:197–213.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
75. 1. Tabacchi E.,
    2. Lambs L.,
    3. Guilloy H.,
    4. Planty-Tabacchi A.M.,
    5. Muller E.,
    6. Decamps H.

    2000. Impacts of riparian vegetation on hydrological processes. Hydrological Processes 14:2959–2976.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
76. 1. Tanaka S.K.,
    2. Zhu T.J.,
    3. Lund J.R.,
    4. Howitt R.E.,
    5. Jenkins M.W.,
    6. et al.

    2006. Climate warming and water management adaptation for California. Climatic Change 76:361–387.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
77. 1. Tockner K.,
    2. Stanford J.A.

    2002. Riverine flood plains: Present state and future trends. Environmental Conservation 29: 308–330.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
78. 1. Trowbridge W.B.

    2007. The role of stochasticity and priority effects in flood-plain restoration. Ecological Applications 17:1312–1324.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
79. 1. Uesugi A.,
    2. Murakami M.

    2007. Do seasonally fluctuating aquatic subsidies influence the distribution pattern of birds between riparian and upland forests? Ecological Research 22:274–281.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
80. 1. U.S. General Accountability Office

    2007. Climate change: Agencies should develop guidance for addressing the effects on Federal land and water resources. U.S. General Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters GAO-07-863.
81. 1. Vicuna S.,
    2. Dracup J.A.

    2007. The evolution of climate change impact studies on hydrology and water resources in California. Climatic Change 82:327–350.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
82. 1. Wilcove D.S.,
    2. Lee J.

    2004. Using economic and regulatory incentives to restore endangered species: Lessons learned from three new programs. Conservation Biology 18:639–645.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
83. 1. Wipfli M.S.

    1997. Terrestrial invertebrates as salmonid prey and nitrogen sources in streams: Contrasting old-growth and young-growth riparian forests in southeastern Alaska, USA. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54:1259–1269.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
84. 1. Zedler J.B.,
    2. Kercher S.

    2004. Causes and consequences of invasive plants in wetlands: Opportunities, opportunists, and outcomes. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 23:431–452.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
85. 1. Zedler J.B.,
    2. Kercher S.

    2005. Wetland resources: Status, trends, ecosystem services, and restorability. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30:39–74.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science