Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Ecological Restoration
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Ecological Restoration

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Review ArticleArticles

An Invitation for Public Participation in Ecological Restoration: The Reasonable Person Model

Kimberly Bosworth Phalen
Ecological Restoration, June 2009, 27 (2) 178-186; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/er.27.2.178
Kimberly Bosworth Phalen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

    1. Anonymous
    . 2007. Cook County president lifts restoration moratorium. Chicago Wilderness Winter. www.chicagowildernessmag.org/issues/winter2007/news/restoration.html
    1. Barro S.C.,
    2. Bright A.D.
    1998. Public views on ecological restoration: A snapshot from the Chicago area. Restoration & Management Notes 16:59–65.
    OpenUrl
    1. Berman M.,
    2. Jonides J.,
    3. Kaplan S.
    2008. The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science 19:1207–1212.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Chase W.G.,
    2. Simon H.A.
    1973. The mind’s eye in chess. Pages 215–281in Chase W.G. (ed), Visual Information Processing. New York: Academic Press.
    1. ChicagoLand Online Nature Knowledge (CLONK)
    . 2000. Natural areas restoration in Cook County Forest Preserves: People working together to help nature. The unofficial Cook County Forest Preserve District page. users. rcn.com/clonk/CCFPD/NaturalAreas/index.html
    1. Cimprich B.
    1992. Attentional fatigue following breast cancer surgery. Research in Nursing and Health 15:199–207.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Cimprich B.
    1993. Development of an intervention to restore attention in cancer patients. Cancer Nursing 16:83–92.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. De Groot A.D.
    1965. Thought and Choice in Chess. Trans. and ed. Baylor G.W. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
    1. Ghioto G.
    2000. Forest thinning foiled again. Arizona Daily Sun October 27. hdl.handle.net/2019/91
    1. Gobster P.H.
    1997. The Chicago Wilderness and its Critics: III. The other side; A survey of the arguments. Restoration & Management Notes 15:32–37.
    OpenUrl
    1. Gobster P.H.,
    2. Barro S.C.
    2000. Negotiating nature: Making restoration happen in an urban park context. Pages 185–207 in Gobster P.H., Hill R.B. (eds), Restoring Nature.
    1. Gobster P.H.,
    2. Hill R.B.
    2000. Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities. Washington DC: Island Press.
    1. Grese R.E.,
    2. Kaplan R.,
    3. Ryan R.L.,
    4. Buxton J.
    2000. Psychological benefits of volunteering in stewardship programs. Pages 265–280 in Gobster P.H., Hill R.B. (eds), Restoring Nature.
    1. Hartig T.,
    2. Mang M.,
    3. Evans G.W.
    1991. Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment and Behavior 23:3–26.
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Helford R.M.
    2000. Constructing nature as constructing science: Expertise, activist science, and public conflict in the Chicago Wilderness. Pages 119–142 in Gobster P.H., Hill R.B. (eds), Restoring Nature.
    1. Jordan W.R. III.
    . 1997. The Chicago Wilderness and its critics: Progress and controversy on a restoration frontier. Restoration & Management Notes 15:16.
    OpenUrl
    1. Kaplan R.
    1993. Physical models in decision making for design: Theoretical and methodological issues. Pages 61–86 in Marans R.W., Stokols D. (eds), Environmental Simulation: Research and Policy Issues. New York: Plenum Press.
    1. Kaplan R,
    2. Kaplan S.
    1989a. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press. Repr., Ann Arbor MI: Ulrich’s, 1995
    1. Kaplan R,
    2. Kaplan S.
    2005. Preference, restoration, and meaningful action in the context of nearby nature. Pages 271–298 in Barlett P.F. (eds), Urban Place: Reconnecting with the Natural World. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    1. Kaplan R.,
    2. Kaplan S.,
    3. Bosworth K.,
    4. Kumler L.,
    5. Ryan R.,
    6. Sullivan W.,
    7. Wells N.
    2008. Participation as a Social and Personal Good. Burlington VT: International Association for Society & Natural Resources.
    1. Kaplan R.,
    2. Kaplan S.,
    3. Ryan R.L.
    1998. With People in Mind: Design and Management of Everyday Nature. Washington DC: Island Press.
    1. Kaplan S,
    2. Kaplan R.
    1978. Humanscape: Environments for People. Belmont CA: Duxbury. Repr., Ann Arbor MI: Ulrich’s, 1982
    1. Kaplan S,
    2. Kaplan R.
    1982. Cognition and Environment: Functioning in an Uncertain World. New York: Praeger. Repr., Ann Arbor MI: Ulrich’s, 1989
    1. Kaplan S.,
    2. Kaplan R.
    1989b. The visual environment: Public participation in design and planning. Journal of Social Issues 45:59–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Kaplan S.,
    2. Kaplan R.
    2003. Health, supportive environments, and the Reasonable Person Model. American Journal of Public Health 93:1484–1489.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Kuo F.E.,
    2. Sullivan W.C.
    2001. Aggression and violence in the inner city: Effects of environment via mental fatigue. Environment and Behavior 33: 543–571.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Lambert A.
    1999. Shifting paradigms: The heart in restoration education. Ecological Restoration 17:126–135.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Marler M.J.,
    2. Supplee K.,
    3. Wessner M.,
    4. Marks G.
    2005. Changing attitudes about grassland conservation in Missoula, Montana—“Weed capital of the west.” Ecological Restoration 23:29–34.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Miles I.,
    2. Sullivan W.C.,
    3. Kuo F.E.
    2000. Psychological benefits of volunteering for restoration projects. Ecological Restoration 18:218–227.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Miller J.R.,
    2. Hobbs R.J.
    2002. Conservation where people live and work. Conservation Biology 16:330–337.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Nassauer J.I.
    1995. Messy ecosystems, orderly frames. Landscape Journal 14: 161–170.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Ostergren D.M.,
    2. Abrams J.B.,
    3. Lowe K.A.
    2008. Fire in the forest: Public perceptions of ecological restoration in north-central Arizona. Ecological Restoration 26:51–60.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Ross L.M.
    1997. The Chicago Wilderness and its critics: I. The Chicago Wilderness; A coalition for urban conservation. Restoration & Management Notes 15:17–24.
    OpenUrl
    1. Sauer L,
    2. Andropogon Associates
    . 1998. The North Woods of Central Park. Pages 195–209 in Sauer L., Andropogon Associates (eds), The Once and Future Forest: A Guide to Forest Restoration Strategies. Washington DC: Island Press.
    1. Schroeder H.
    2000. The restoration experience: Volunteers’ motives, values, and concepts of nature. Pages 247–264 in Gobster P.H., Hill R.B. (eds), Restoring Nature.
    1. Shore D.
    1997. The Chicago Wilderness and its critics: II. Controversy erupts over restoration in Chicago area. Restoration & Management Notes 15:25–31.
    OpenUrl
    1. Siewers A.
    1998. Making the quantum culture leap: Reflections on the Chicago controversy. Restoration & Management Notes 16:8–15.
    OpenUrl
    1. Society for Ecological Restoration International Science & Policy Working Group (SER)
    . 2004. The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration, vers. 2. www.ser.org & Tucson AZ: Society for Ecological Restoration International. www.ser.org/pdf/primer3.pdf
    1. Taylor A.F.,
    2. Kuo F.E.,
    3. Sullivan W.
    2002. Views of nature and self-discipline: Evidence from inner city children. Journal of Environmental Psychology 22:49–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Tennessen C.M.,
    2. Cimprich B.
    1995. Views to nature: Effects on attention. Journal of Environmental Psychology 15:77–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Woodall C.,
    2. Handler A.,
    3. Broberg L.
    2000. Social dilemmas in grassland restoration: Integrating ecology and community on a Montana mountainside. Ecological Restoration 18:39–44.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ecological Restoration
Vol. 27, Issue 2
1 Jun 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ecological Restoration.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
An Invitation for Public Participation in Ecological Restoration: The Reasonable Person Model
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ecological Restoration
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ecological Restoration web site.
Citation Tools
An Invitation for Public Participation in Ecological Restoration: The Reasonable Person Model
Kimberly Bosworth Phalen
Ecological Restoration Jun 2009, 27 (2) 178-186; DOI: 10.3368/er.27.2.178

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
An Invitation for Public Participation in Ecological Restoration: The Reasonable Person Model
Kimberly Bosworth Phalen
Ecological Restoration Jun 2009, 27 (2) 178-186; DOI: 10.3368/er.27.2.178
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Choosing Plant Diversity Metrics: A Tallgrass Prairie Case Study
  • A Conceptual Planning Framework to Improve Integration of Reclamation with Site Remediation
  • Genetic Diversity, Mating System, and Reproductive Output of Restored Melaleuca acuminata Populations are Comparable to Natural Remnant Populations
Show more Articles

Review

  • Hunt for the Shadow Wolf: The Lost History of Wolves in Britain and the Myths and Stories that Surround Them
  • Socioeconomic Barriers and the Role of Biomass Utilization in Southwestern Ponderosa Pine Restoration
Show more Review

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Chicago Wilderness
  • ecological restoration
  • Montrose Point
  • public participation
  • Reasonable Person Model
UW Press logo

© 2026 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire