Fire in the Forest: Public Perceptions of Ecological Restoration in North-central Arizona

References

1. 1. Abrams J.,
   2. Kelly E.,
   3. Shindler B.A.,
   4. Wilton J.

   . 2005. Value orientation and forest management: The forest health debate. Environmental Management 36:495–505.

   OpenUrlPubMed
2. 1. Agee J.K.

   2002. The fallacy of passive management of western forest reserves. Conservation Biology in Practice 3(1):18–25.

   OpenUrl
3. 1. Allen C.D.,
   2. Falk D.A.,
   3. Hoffman M.,
   4. Klingel J.,
   5. Morgan P.,
   6. Savage M.,
   7. Schulke T.,
   8. Stacey P.,
   9. Suckling K.,
   10. Swetnam T.W.

   . 2002. Ecological restoration of southwestern ponderosa pine ecosystems: A broad perspective. Ecological Applications 12:1418–1433.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. 1. Allison S.K.

   2004. What do we mean when we talk about ecological restoration? Ecological Restoration 22:281–286.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
5. 1. Arizona Daily Sun

   . 2001. The time is now to keep forests healthy. Editorial Page. August 10, 2001.
6. Bonnicksen, T.M. 1994. Social and political issues in ecological restoration. Pages 108–114 in W.W. Covington and L.F. DeBano (coords), Sustainable ecological systems: Implementing an ecological approach to land management. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM–27.
7. 1. Brick P.,
   2. Snow D.,
   3. van de Wetering S.

   . 2001. Across the Great Divide: Explorations in Collaborative Conservation and the American West. Washington, DC: Island Press.
8. 1. Bright A.D.,
   2. Barro S.C.,
   3. Burtz R.T.

   . 2002. Public attitudes toward ecological restoration in the Chicago metropolitan region. Society and Natural Resources 15:763–785.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
9. 1. Brunner R.D.,
   2. Stellman T.A.,
   3. Coe-Juell L.,
   4. Cromley C.M.,
   5. Edwards C.M.,
   6. Tucker D.W.

   . 2005. Adaptive Governance: Integrating Science Policy and Decision Making. New York: Columbia University Press.
10. 1. Brunson M.W.,
    2. Evans J.

    . 2005. Badly burned?: Effects of an escaped prescribed burn on social acceptability of wildland fuels treatments. Journal of Forestry 103:134–138.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
11. 1. Brunson M.W.,
    2. Shindler B.A.

    . 2004. Geographic variation in social acceptability of wildland fuels management in the western United States. Society and Natural Resources 17:661–678.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. 1. Brunson M.W.,
    2. Shindler B.,
    3. Steel B.S.

    . 1997. Consensus and dissension among rural and urban publics concerning forest management in the Pacific Northwest. Pages 83–94 in Steel B.S. (ed.), Public Lands Management in the West: Citizens, Interest Groups, and Values. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing.
13. 1. Burns S.

    2003. Catron County, New Mexico: Mirroring the west, healing the land, rebuilding community. Pages 89–115 in Kusel J., Adler E. (eds), Forest Communities, Community Forests. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
14. 1. Connelly N.A.,
    2. Brown T.L.,
    3. Decker D.J.

    . 2003. Factors affecting response rates to natural resource-focused mail surveys: Empirical evidence of declining rates over time. Society and Natural Resources 16:541–549.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. 1. Cooper C.F.

    1960. Changes in vegetation, structure, and growth of southwestern pine forests since white settlement. Ecological Monographs 30:129–164.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. Cortner, H.J., J.S. Vaughn and G.M.R. Teich. 2003. Designing a framework for evaluating the impacts and outcomes of Forest Service appeals. Summary of a workshop in Troutdale, OR, January 6–8, 2003. Flagstaff, AZ: Ecological Restoration Institute.
17. 1. Covington W.W.

    2000. Prescribed fire is not the issue. Journal of Forestry 98(8):48.

    OpenUrl
18. 1. Covington W.W.

    2003a. The evolutionary and historical context. Pages 26–47 in Friederici P. (ed), Ecological Restoration of Southwestern Ponderosa Pine Forests. Washington, DC: Island Press.
19. 1. Covington W.W.

    2003b Restoring ecosystem health in frequent-fire forests of the American West. Ecological Restoration 21:7–11.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
20. 1. Covington W.W.,
    2. Everett R.L.,
    3. Steele R.,
    4. Irwin L.L.,
    5. Daer T.A.,
    6. AuClair A.N.D.

    . 1994. Historical and anticipated changes in forest ecosystems of the inland west of the United States. Pages 13–63 in Sampson R.N., Adams D.L. (eds.), Assessing Forest Ecosystem Health in the Inland West. New York: Food Products Press.
21. 1. Dillman D.A.

    2000. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
22. 1. Findley A.J.,
    2. Carroll M.S.,
    3. Blatner K.A.

    . 2001. Social complexity and the management of small-diameter stands. Journal of Forestry 99(12):18–27.

    OpenUrl
23. 1. Friederici P.

    2003. The “Flagstaff Model.” Pages 7–25 in Friederici P. (ed), Ecological Restoration of Southwestern Ponderosa Pine Forests. Washington, DC: Island Press.
24. 1. Friederici P.

    2005. Restoration of ponderosa pine forests to presettlement conditions. Working Papers in Southwestern Ponderosa Pine Forest Restoration No. 9. Flagstaff: Ecological Restoration Institute, Northern Arizona University.
25. Ghioto, G. 2000. Forest thinning foiled again. Arizona Daily Sun 10/27/2000 on file at https://library.eri.nau.edu:8443/bitstream/2019/91/1/Ghioto.2000.ForestThinningFoiledAgain.pdf.
26. 1. Gobster P.H.,
    2. Hull R. B.

    (eds). 2000. Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
27. 1. Graber D.M.

    2003. Ecological restoration in wilderness: Natural versus wild in National Park Service wilderness. The George Wright Forum 20(3):34–41.

    OpenUrl
28. 1. Gross M.

    2003. Inventing Nature: Ecological Restoration by Public Experiments. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
29. Healthy Forest Restoration Act (HFRA). 2003. U.S. Code 16 §§ 6501–6591.
30. 1. Helford R.M.

    2000. Constructing nature as constructing science: Expertise, activist science, and public conflict in the Chicago wilderness. Pages 119–142 in Gobster P.H., Hull R.B. (eds), Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
31. 1. Higgs E.S.

    1997. What is good ecological restoration? Conservation Biology 11:338–348.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. 1. Hobbs R.J.,
    2. Norton D.A.

    . 1996. Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 4:93–110.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. 1. Jackson L.L.,
    2. Lopoukhine N.,
    3. Hillyard D.

    . 1995. Ecological restoration: A definition and comments. Restoration Ecology 3:71–75.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. 1. Jordan W.R. III.

    . 2000. Restoration, community, and wilderness. Pages 21–36 in Gobster P.H., Hull R. B.. (eds), Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
35. 1. Joyce L.A.

    2003. Improving the flow of scientific information across the interface of forest science and policy. Forest Policy and Economics 5:339–347.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
36. 1. Katz E.

    2000. Another look at restoration: Technology and artificial nature. Pages 37–48 in Gobster P.H., Hull R. B. (eds), Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
37. 1. Kaufmann M.R.,
    2. Fulé P.Z.,
    3. Romme W.H.,
    4. Ryan K.C.

    . 2004. Restoration of ponderosa pine forests in the interior western U.S. after logging, grazing, and fire suppression. Pages 481–500 in Stanturf J.A., Madsen P. (eds), Restoration of Boreal and Temperate Forests. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
38. 1. Loomis J.B.,
    2. Bair L.S.,
    3. Gonzalez-Caban A.

    . 2001. Prescribed fire and public support: Knowledge gained, attitudes changed in Florida. Journal of Forestry 99(11):18–22.

    OpenUrl
39. 1. Manfredo M.J.,
    2. Fishbein M.,
    3. Haas G.E.,
    4. Watson A.E.

    . 1990. Attitudes toward prescribed fire policies: The public is widely divided in its support. Journal of Forestry 88(7):19–23.

    OpenUrl
40. 1. Mast J.N.,
    2. Fulé P.Z.,
    3. Moore M.M.,
    4. Covington W.W.,
    5. Waltz A.E.M.

    . 1999. Restoration of presettlement age structure of an Arizona ponderosa pine forest. Ecological Applications 9:228–239.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
41. 1. Meadow R.,
    2. Reading R.P.,
    3. Phillips M.,
    4. Mehringer M.,
    5. Miller B.J.

    . 2005. The influence of persuasive arguments on public attitudes toward a proposed wolf restoration in the southern Rockies. Wildlife Society Bulletin 33:154–163.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
42. 1. Moore M.M.,
    2. Covington W.W.,
    3. Fulé P.Z.

    . 1999. Invited Feature - Reference conditions and ecological restoration: A southwestern ponderosa pine perspective. Ecological Applications 9:1266–1277.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
43. 1. Moore M.M.,
    2. Huffman D.W.,
    3. Fulé P. Z.,
    4. Covington W.W.,
    5. Crouse J.E.

    . 2004. Comparison of historical and contemporary forest structure and composition on permanent plots in southwestern ponderosa pine forests. Forest Science 50:162–176.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
44. 1. Moote M.A.

    2003. Community-based forest restoration. Pages 335–352 in Friederici P.. (ed), Ecological Restoration of Southwestern Ponderosa Pine Forests. Washington, DC: Island Press.
45. National Fire Plan 2001. Review and Update of the 1995 Federal Wildland Fire Management Policy. http://www.forestsandrangelands.gov/NFP/index.shtml.
46. 1. Noss R.F.,
    2. Beier P.,
    3. Covington W.W.,
    4. Grumbine R.E.,
    5. Lindenmayer D.B.,
    6. Prather J.W.,
    7. Schmiegelow F.,
    8. Sisk T.D.,
    9. Vosick D.J.

    . 2006. Recommendations for integrating restoration ecology and conservation biology in ponderosa pine forests of the southwestern United States. Restoration Ecology 14:4–10.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
47. 1. Ostergren D.M.,
    2. Lowe K.A.,
    3. Abrams J.B.,
    4. Ruther E.J.

    . 2006. Public perceptions of forest management in north-central Arizona: The paradox of demanding more involvement but allowing limits to legal action. Journal of Forestry 104:375–382.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
48. 1. Pyne S.J.

    2004. Tending Fire: Coping with America’s Wildland Fires. Washington, DC: Island Press.
49. 1. Schumman M.

    . 2004. Fuel reduction projects in southwest ponderosa pine forests: A description of sites and treatments. National Community Forestry Center, Southwest Region Working Paper No. 9. Santa Fe, NM: Forest Guild.
50. 1. Shelby B.,
    2. Speaker R.W.

    . 1990. Public attitudes and perceptions about prescribed burning. Pages 253–260 in Walstad J.D., Radosevich S.R., Sandberg D.V. (eds), Natural and Prescribed Fire in Pacific Northwest Forests, Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.
51. 1. Shindler B.A.,
    2. List P.,
    3. Steel B.S.

    . 1993. Managing federal forests: Public attitudes in Oregon and nationwide. Journal of Forestry 91(7):36–42.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
52. 1. Shindler B.A.,
    2. Wilton J.,
    3. Wright A.

    . 2002. A Social Assessment of Ecosystem Health: Public Perspectives on Pacific Northwest Forests. Corvallis: Department of Forest Resources, Oregon State University.
53. 1. Simpson T.B.

    . 2005. Ecological restoration and re-understanding ecological time. Ecological Restoration 23:46–51.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
54. 1. Sisk T.D.,
    2. Prather J.W.,
    3. Hampton H.M.,
    4. Aumack E.N.,
    5. Xu Y.,
    6. Dickson B.G.

    . 2006. Participatory landscape analysis to guide restoration of ponderosa pine ecosystems in the American Southwest. Landscape and Urban Planning. 78:300–310.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
55. Solop, F.I., K.K. Hagen and D. M. Ostergren. 2004. Managing nonnative plants and animals: Analysis of public opinion. National Park Service Technical Report to the Department of Interior. http://www.nature.nps.gov/socialscience/pdf/Managing_Nonnative_Plants_and_Animals_Report_07_2004.pdf.
56. 1. Taylor J.G.,
    2. Daniel T.C.

    . 1984. Prescribed fire: Public education and perception. Journal of Forestry 82:361–365.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
57. 1. Theodori G.L.,
    2. Luloff A.E.

    . 2002. Position on environmental issues and engagement in proenvironmental behaviors. Society and Natural Resources 15: 471–482.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
58. 1. Thomas J.W.

    2002. Dynamic vs. static management in a fire-influenced landscape: The Northwest Forest Plan. Paper presented at the Fire in Oregon’s Forests conference, Bend, OR, October 23, 2002.

    OpenUrl
59. 1. Toman E.,
    2. Shindler B.A.

    . 2003. Hazardous fuel reduction in the Blue Mountains: Public attitudes and opinions. Pages 241–254 in Omi P.N., Joyce L.A. (eds), Fire, Fuel Treatments, and Ecological Restoration, USDA Forest Service RMRS-P-29.
60. U.S. Department of Agriculture and Department of the Interior (USDA/DOI). 2000. Managing the impact of wildfires on communities and the environment. A report to the President in response to the wildfires of 2000. http://www.fs.fed.us/emc/hfi/president.pdf.
61. U.S. Forest Service (USFS) 2000. Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) Fort Valley Ecosystem Restoration Project. http://www.fs.fed.us/r3/coconino/nepa/fort_valley_dn.html.
62. 1. Vaske J.J.,
    2. Donnelly M.P.,
    3. Williams D.R.,
    4. Jonker S.

    . 2001. Demographic influences on environmental value orientations and normative beliefs about national forest management. Society and Natural Resources 14:761–776.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
63. 1. Vining J.,
    2. Tyler E.,
    3. Kweon B.

    . 2000. Public values, opinions, and emotions in restoration controversies. Pages 143–161 in Gobster P.H., Hull R.B. (eds), Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
64. 1. Vogt C.

    2003. Seasonal and permanent home owners’ past experiences and approval of fuels reduction. Pages 63–73 in Homeowners, communities, and wildfire: Science findings from the National Fire Plan. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NC-231.
65. Vogt, C., G. Winter and J.S. Fried. 2003. Antecedents to attitudes toward prescribed burning, mechanical thinning, and defensible space fuel reduction techniques. Pages 74–83 in Homeowners, communities, and wildfire: Science findings from the National Fire Plan. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NC-231.
66. 1. Winter G.J.,
    2. Fried J.S.

    . 2000. Homeowner perspectives on fire hazard, responsibility, and management strategies at the wildland-urban interface. Society and Natural Resources 13:33–49.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
67. 1. Winter G.J.,
    2. Vogt C.A.,
    3. Fried J.S.

    . 2002. Fuel treatments at the wildland-urban interface: Common concerns in diverse regions. Journal of Forestry 100(1):15–21.

    OpenUrl
68. 1. Winter G.J.,
    2. Vogt C.A.,
    3. McCaffrey S.

    . 2004. Examining social trust in fuels management strategies. Journal of Forestry 102(6):8–15.

    OpenUrl
69. 1. Winter P.L.,
    2. Cvetkovich G.T.

    . 2003. A study of Southwesterners’ opinions on the management of wildland and wilderness fires: Fire management version. Riverside, CA: Wildland Recreation and Urban Cultures, Pacific Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service.
70. 1. Woolley J.T.,
    2. McGinnis M.V.

    . 2000. The conflicting discourses of restoration. Society and Natural Resources 13:339–357.

    OpenUrlCrossRef