Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Ecological Restoration
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Ecological Restoration

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleARTICLESP

Success: An Unclear, Subjective Descriptor of Restoration Outcomes

Joy B. Zedler
Ecological Restoration, September 2007, 25 (3) 162-168; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/er.25.3.162
Joy B. Zedler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The continuing development of the science of restoration is muddled by unclear and inconsistent use of the term “success.” In recent issues of two journals, Restoration Ecology and Ecological Engineering, 116 papers employed the term to predict outcomes, judge outcomes, describe criteria for judging projects, or refer to an ecosystem attribute, all in the restoration context. Only ten papers used “failure.” In this article I argue that ecologists can communicate with greater clarity and objectivity by omitting or clarifying the word success when publishing in the scientific literature. Many uses can easily be dropped (for example, compliance success can become compliance, and establishment success can be establishment). A common term, “restoration success” would be clearer if replaced with more specific terms (for example, project completion, achieving dense plant cover, supporting high species richness, or colonization by target species). At minimum, authors can define the term and use it consistently. When meant as a value judgment, it would help to say, “In my opinion, the project was a success” (or failure) and then specify on what basis the judgment was made. Thus, I recommend abstinence, substitution, and clarification of the term success to aid communication and help restoration ecology mature as a science.

  • clarity
  • failure
  • objectivity
  • restoration science
  • scientific communication
  • success

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ecological Restoration
Vol. 25, Issue 3
1 Sep 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ecological Restoration.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Success: An Unclear, Subjective Descriptor of Restoration Outcomes
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ecological Restoration
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ecological Restoration web site.
Citation Tools
Success: An Unclear, Subjective Descriptor of Restoration Outcomes
Joy B. Zedler
Ecological Restoration Sep 2007, 25 (3) 162-168; DOI: 10.3368/er.25.3.162

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Success: An Unclear, Subjective Descriptor of Restoration Outcomes
Joy B. Zedler
Ecological Restoration Sep 2007, 25 (3) 162-168; DOI: 10.3368/er.25.3.162
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • A site selection decision framework for effective kelp restoration
  • Evaluation of Restoration Success to Inform Future Restoration Efforts in Acacia reficiens Invaded Rangelands in Northern Kenya
  • A Decision Support System for Incorporating Land Potential Information in the Evaluation of Restoration Outcomes
  • A Conceptual Planning Framework to Improve Integration of Reclamation with Site Remediation
  • Spanning the Science-Practice Divide: Why Restoration Scientists Need to be More Involved with Practice
  • Challenging Assumptions in Urban Restoration Ecology
  • Indicators of Recovery in a Tropical Freshwater Marsh Invaded by an African Grass
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Choosing Plant Diversity Metrics: A Tallgrass Prairie Case Study
  • A Conceptual Planning Framework to Improve Integration of Reclamation with Site Remediation
  • Genetic Diversity, Mating System, and Reproductive Output of Restored Melaleuca acuminata Populations are Comparable to Natural Remnant Populations
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

UW Press logo

© 2025 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire