Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Ecological Restoration
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Ecological Restoration

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleARTICLESU

Lessons from an Urban Lakeshore Restoration Project in New York City

Shannon L. Galbraith-Kent and Steven N. Handel
Ecological Restoration, June 2007, 25 (2) 123-128; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/er.25.2.123
Shannon L. Galbraith-Kent
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven N. Handel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Wetlands, uplands and turtle habitat were targets for a 1995 restoration of 488 m of a lakeshore in Flushing Meadows Corona Park in New York City. Approximately 25,000 plants (native species of grasses, herbs, shrubs, and trees) were introduced and intensively monitored through 1997 and monitored periodically until 2003. Vegetation was not managed during this time. While biodiversity and habitat complexity goals were achieved for wildlife, few elements of the initial plantings persist. Invasive species (common reed [Phragmites australis], purple loosestrife [Lythrum salicaria], common wormwood [Artemisia vulgaris]) are abundant in both uplands and wetlands. The larger upland parcels and larger (and deeper) wetlands supported more planted species and were more resistant to the spread of invasive species. Many of the original plantings were destroyed due to arson, theft, and lack of management.

  • invasive species
  • New York City
  • Phragmites australis
  • urban restoration
  • wetland

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ecological Restoration
Vol. 25, Issue 2
1 Jun 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ecological Restoration.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Lessons from an Urban Lakeshore Restoration Project in New York City
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ecological Restoration
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ecological Restoration web site.
Citation Tools
Lessons from an Urban Lakeshore Restoration Project in New York City
Shannon L. Galbraith-Kent, Steven N. Handel
Ecological Restoration Jun 2007, 25 (2) 123-128; DOI: 10.3368/er.25.2.123

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Lessons from an Urban Lakeshore Restoration Project in New York City
Shannon L. Galbraith-Kent, Steven N. Handel
Ecological Restoration Jun 2007, 25 (2) 123-128; DOI: 10.3368/er.25.2.123
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Conifer restoration on lakeshores using 3 planting techniques
  • An Assessment of Urban Lakeshore Restorations in Minnesota
  • Urban Ecological Restoration
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A Conceptual Planning Framework to Improve Integration of Reclamation with Site Remediation
  • Genetic Diversity, Mating System, and Reproductive Output of Restored Melaleuca acuminata Populations are Comparable to Natural Remnant Populations
  • Simulated Fire Season and Temperature Affect Centaurea stoebe Control, Native Plant Growth, and Soil (±)-catechin
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

UW Press logo

© 2025 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire