Ecological Restoration
Marshland Transplant Aquatic Nursery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Ecological Rest. 27(3):330-338 (2009); doi:10.3368/er.27.3.330
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seavy, N. E.
Right arrow Articles by Weigand, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Special Theme: Climate Change and Ecological Restoration

Why Climate Change Makes Riparian Restoration More Important than Ever: Recommendations for Practice and Research

Nathaniel E. Seavy, Thomas Gardali, Gregory H. Golet, F. Thomas Griggs, Christine A. Howell, Rodd Kelsey, Stacy L. Small, Joshua H. Viers and James F. Weigand


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 References
 
Over the next century, climate change will dramatically alter natural resource management. Specifically, historical reference conditions may no longer serve as benchmarks for restoration, which may foster a "why bother?" attitude toward ecological restoration. We review the potential role for riparian restoration to prepare ecological systems for the threats posed by climate change. Riparian ecosystems are naturally resilient, provide linear habitat connectivity, link aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, and create thermal refugia for wildlife: all characteristics that can contribute to ecological adaptation to climate change. Because riparian systems and the projected impacts of climate change are highly variable geographically, there is a pressing need to develop a place-based understanding of climate change threats to riparian ecosystems. Restoration practitioners should consider how they can modify practices to enhance the resilience of riparian ecosystems to climate change. Such modifications may include accelerating the restoration of private lands, participating in water management decisions, and putting the emerging field of restoration genetics into practice.

Keywords: California, climate change, genetics, hydrology, restoration, riparian


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 References
 

Ahearn, D.S., J.H. Viers, J.F. Mount and R.A. Dahlgren 2006. Priming the productivity pump: Flood pulse driven trends in suspended algal biomass distribution across a restored floodplain. Freshwater Biology 51:1417–1433.[CrossRef]

Ahlering, M.A. and J. Faaborg 2006. Avian habitat management meets conspecific attraction: If you build it, will they come? Auk 123:301–312.[CrossRef]

Alcamo, J., M. Florke and M. Marker 2007. Future long-term changes in global water resources driven by socioeconomic and climatic changes. Hydrological Sciences Journal 52:247–275.[CrossRef]

Alpert, P., F.T. Griggs and D.R. Peterson 1999. Riparian forest restoration along large rivers: Initial results from the Sacramento River Project. Restoration Ecology 7:360–368.[CrossRef]

Bakker, E.S. 1984. An Island Called California: An Ecological Introduction to its Natural Communities . Berkeley: University of California Press.

Barnett, T.P., J.C. Adam and D.P. Lettenmaier 2005. Potential impacts of a warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions. Nature 438:303–309.[CrossRef][Medline]

Battin, J., M.W. Wiley, M.H. Ruckelshaus, R.N. Palmer, E. Korb, 2007. Projected impacts of climate change on salmon habitat restoration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104:6720–6725.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bélisle, M and C.C. St. Clair 2001. Cumulative effects of barriers on the movements of forest birds. Ecology & Society 5(2):9. www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol5/iss2/art9

Bernhardt, E.S., M.A. Palmer, J.D. Allan, G. Alexander, K. Barnas, 2005. Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts. Science 308:636–637.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Booth, E., J. Mount and J.H. Viers 2006. Hydrologic variability of the Cosumnes River floodplain. San Francisco Estuary & Watershed Science 4(2):2. repositories.cdlib.org/jmie/sfews/vol4/iss2/art2/

Both, C. and M.E. Visser 2001. Adjustment to climate change is constrained by arrival date in a long-distance migrant bird. Nature 411:296–298.[CrossRef][Medline]

Boulton, A.J. and P.J. Hancock 2006. Rivers as groundwater-dependent ecosystems: A review of degrees of dependency, riverine processes and management implications. Australian Journal of Botany 54:133–144.[CrossRef]

Bower, A.D. and S.N. Aitken 2008. Ecological genetics and seed transfer guidelines for Pinus albicaulis (Pinaceae). American Journal of Botany 95:66–76.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Brauman, K.A., G.C. Daily, T.K. Duarte and H.A. Mooney 2007. The nature and value of ecosystem services: An overview highlighting hydrologic services. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 32:67–98.[CrossRef]

Bunn, D., A. Mummert, M. Hoshovsky, K. Gilardi and S. Shanks 2007. California wildlife: Conservation challenges; California’s wildlife action plan. Sacramento: California Department of Fish and Game.

Cassie, D. 2006. The thermal regime of rivers: A review. Freshwater Biology 51: 1389–1406.[CrossRef]

Choi, Y.D., V.M. Temperton, E.B. Allen, A.P. Grootjans, M. Halassy, 2008. Ecological restoration for future sustainability in a changing environment. Ecoscience 15:53–64.[CrossRef]

Chu, C., N.E. Jones, N.E. Mandrak, A.R. Piggott and C.K. Minns 2008. The influence of air temperature, ground-water discharge, and climate change on the thermal diversity of stream fishes in southern Ontario watersheds. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 65:297–308.

Collinge, S.K., M. Holyoak, C.B. Barr and J.T. Marty 2001. Riparian habitat fragmentation and population persistence of the threatened valley elderberry longhorn beetle in central California. Biological Conservation 100:103–113.[CrossRef]

Cowling, R.M. and R.L. Pressey 2001. Rapid plant diversification: Planning for an evolutionary future. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98: 5452–5457.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Easterling, D.R., G.A. Meehl, C. Parmesan, S.A. Changnon, T.R. Karl and L.O. Mearns 2000. Climate extremes: Observations, modeling, and impacts. Science 289:2068–2074.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fleckenstein, J., M. Anderson, G. Fogg and J. Mount 2004. Managing surface water-groundwater to restore fall flows in the Cosumnes River. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 130:301–310.

Florsheim, J.L. and J.F. Mount 2002. Restoration of floodplain topography by sand-splay complex formation in response to intentional levee breaches, Lower Cosumnes River, California. Geomorphology 44:67–94.[CrossRef]

Fulé, P.Z. 2008. Does it make sense to restore wildland fire in changing climate? Restoration Ecology 16:526–531.[CrossRef]

Gardali, T., A.L. Holmes, S.L. Small, N. Nur, G.R. Geupel and G.H. Golet 2006. Abundance patterns of landbirds in restored and remnant riparian forests on the Sacramento River, California, USA. Restoration Ecology 14:391–403.[CrossRef]

Gergel, S.E., M.D. Dixon and M.G. Turner 2002. Consequences of human-altered floods: Levees, floods, and floodplain forests along the Wisconsin River. Ecological Applications 12:1755–1770.[CrossRef]

Golet, G.H., T. Gardali, C.A. Howell, J. Hunt, R.A. Luster, 2008. Wildlife response to riparian restoration on the Sacramento River. San Francisco Estuary & Watershed Science 6(2):1. repositories.cdlib.org/jmie/sfews/vol6/iss2/art1/

Golet, G.H., M.D. Roberts, R.A. Luster, G. Werner, E.W. Larsen, 2006. Assessing societal impacts when planning restoration of large alluvial rivers: A case study of the Sacramento River project, California. Environmental Management 37:862–879.[Medline]

Grindal, S.D., J.L. Morissette and R.M. Brigham 1999. Concentration of bat activity in riparian habitats over an elevational gradient. Canadian Journal of Zoology 77:972–977.[CrossRef]

Gunderson, L.H. 2000. Ecological resilience—in theory and application. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31:425–439.[CrossRef]

Hansen, L.J., J.L. Biringer, and J.R. Hoffman, eds. 2003. Buying Time: A User’s Manual for Building Resistance and Resilience to Climate Change in Natural Systems . Washington DC: World Wildlife Fund.

Harris, J.A., R.J. Hobbs, E. Higgs and J. Aronson 2006. Ecological restoration and global climate change. Restoration Ecology 14:170–176.[CrossRef]

Hayhoe, K., D. Cayan, C.B. Field, P.C. Frumhoff, E.P. Maurer, 2004. Emissions pathways, climate change, and impacts on California. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101: 12422–12427.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Heller, N.E. and E.S. Zavaleta 2008. Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: A review of 22 years of recommendations. Biological Conservation 142:14–32.[CrossRef]

Hilty, J.A. and A.M. Merenlender 2004. Use of riparian corridors and vineyards by mammalian predators in northern California. Conservation Biology 18: 126–135.[CrossRef]

Hufford, K.M. and S.J. Mazer 2003. Plant ecotypes: Genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18:147–155.[CrossRef]

Hughes, F.M.R., A. Colston and J.O. Mountford 2005. Restoring riparian ecosystems: The challenge of accommodating variability and designing restoration trajectories. Ecology & Society 10(1):12. www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art12/

Inouye, D.W. 2008. Effects of climate change on phenology, frost damage, and floral abundance of montane wild-flowers. Ecology 89:353–362.[CrossRef][Medline]

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2007a. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change . New York: Cambridge University Press.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2007b. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change . New York: Cambridge University Press.

Jeffres, C.A., J.J. Opperman and P.B Moyle 2008. Ephemeral floodplain habitats provide best growth conditions for juvenile Chinook salmon in a California river. Environmental Biology of Fishes 83:449–458.[CrossRef]

Katibah, E.F. 1984. A brief history of riparian forests in the Central Valley of California. Pages 23–29 in R.E. Warner and K.M. Hendrix (eds), California Riparian Systems: Ecology, Conservation, and Productive Management . Berkeley: University of California Press.

Knopf, F.L., R.R. Johnson, T. Rich, F.B. Samson and R.C. Szaro 1988. Conservation of riparian ecosystems in the United States. Wilson Bulletin 100: 272–284.

Kondolf, G.M., A.J. Boulton, S. O’Daniel, G.C. Poole, F.J. Rahel, 2006. Process-based ecological river restoration: Visualizing three-dimensional connectivity and dynamic vectors to recover lost-linkages. Ecology & Society 11(2):5. www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art5/

Langpap, C. 2006. Conservation of endangered species: Can incentives work for private landowners? Ecological Economics 57:558–572.[CrossRef]

Machtans, C.S., M.A. Villard and S.J. Hannon 1996. Use of riparian buffer strips as movement corridors by forest birds. Conservation Biology 10: 1366–1379.[CrossRef]

McCullough, D.A., S. Spalding, D. Sturdevant and M. Hicks 2001. Summary of technical literature examining the physiological effects of temperature on salmonids: Issue paper 5. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Report USEPA-910-D-01-005.

Meave, J. and M. Kellman 1994. Maintenance of rain forest diversity in riparian forests of tropical savannas: Implications for species conservation during Pleistocene drought. Journal of Biogeography 21:121–135.[CrossRef]

Merz, J.E. and P.B. Moyle 2006. Salmon, wildlife, and wine: Marine-derived nutrients in human-dominated ecosystems of central California. Ecological Applications 16:999–1009.[CrossRef][Medline]

Meyer, J.L., M.J. Sale, P.J. Mulholland and N.L. Poff 1999. Impacts of climate change on aquatic ecosystem functioning and health. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 35: 1373–1386.[CrossRef]

Millar, C.I., N.L. Stephenson and S.L. Stephens 2007. Climate change and forests of the future: Managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecological Applications 17:2145–2151.[CrossRef][Medline]

Milly, P.C.D., J. Betancourt, M. Falkenmark, R.M. Hirsch, Z.W. Kundzewicz, 2008. Stationarity is dead: Whither water management? Science 319:573–574.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Milly, P.C.D., R.T. Wetherald, K.A. Dunne and T.L. Delworth 2002. Increasing risk of great floods in a changing climate. Nature 415:514–517.[CrossRef][Medline]

Naiman, R.J., R.E. Bilby and P.A. Bisson 2000. Riparian ecology and management in the Pacific coastal rain forest. Bioscience 50:996–1011.[CrossRef]

Naiman, R.J. and H. Decamps 1997. The ecology of interfaces: Riparian zones. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28:621–658.[CrossRef]

Naiman, R.J., H. Decamps and M. Pollock 1993. The role of riparian corridors in maintaining regional biodiversity. Ecological Applications 3:209–212.[CrossRef]

National Research Council 2002. Riparian Areas: Functions and Strategies for Management . Washington DC: National Academy Press.

Nelson, K.C. and M.A. Palmer 2007. Stream temperature surges under urbanization and climate change: Data, models, and responses. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 43: 440–452.[CrossRef]

Norton, D.A. 2000. Conservation biology and private land: Shifting the focus. Conservation Biology 14:1221.[CrossRef]

O’Donnell, T.K. and D.L. Galat 2008. Evaluating success criteria and project monitoring in river enhancement within an adaptive management framework. Environmental Management 41:90–105.[Medline]

Palmer, M.A., C.A.R. Liermann, C. Nilsson, M. Florke, J. Alcamo, 2008. Climate change and the world’s river basins: Anticipating management options. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6: 81–89.[CrossRef]

Parmesan, C. 2007. Influences of species, latitudes and methodologies on estimates of phenological response to global warming. Global Change Biology 13:1860–1872.[CrossRef]

Poff, N.L. 2002. Ecological response to and management of increased flooding caused by climate change. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A 360:1497–1510.[CrossRef][Medline]

Rice, K.J. and N.C. Emery 2003. Managing microevolution: Restoration in the face of global change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1:469–478.

Richter, B., J. Baumgartner, R. Wingington and D. Braun 1997. How much water does a river need? Freshwater Biology 37:231–249.[CrossRef]

Rosenzweig, C., D. Karoly, M. Vicarelli, P. Neofotis, Q. Wu, 2008. Attributing physical and biological impacts to anthropogenic climate change. Nature 453:353–357.[CrossRef][Medline]

Roux, D.J., K.H. Rogers, H.C. Biggs, P.J. Ashton and A. Sergeant 2006. Bridging the science-management divide: Moving from unidirectional knowledge transfer to knowledge interfacing and sharing. Ecology & Society 11(1):4. www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art4/

Scheffer, M., S. Carpenter, J.A. Foley, C. Folke and B. Walker 2001. Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413:591–596.[CrossRef][Medline]

Seager, R., M.F. Ting, I. Held, Y. Kushnir, J. Lu, 2007. Model projections of an imminent transition to a more arid climate in southwestern North America. Science 316:1181–1184.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Seastedt, T.R., R.J. Hobbs and K.N. Suding 2008. Management of novel ecosystems: Are novel approaches required? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6: 547–553.[CrossRef]

Smulders, M.J.M., J.E. Cottrell, F. Lefèvre, J. van der Schoot, P. Arens, 2008. Structure of the genetic diversity in black poplar (Populus nigra L.) populations across European river systems: Consequences for conservation and restoration. Forest Ecology and Management 255:1388–1399.[CrossRef]

Solomon, S., G. Plattner, R. Knutti and P. Friedlingstein 2009. Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106:1704–1709.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sommer, T., B. Harrell, M. Nobriga, R. Brown, P. Moyle, 2001. California’s Yollo Bypass: Evidence that flood control can be compatible with fisheries, wetlands, wildlife, and agriculture. Fisheries 26:6–16.

Sridhar, V., A.L. Sansone, J. LaMarche, T. Dubin and D.P. Lettenmaier 2004. Prediction of stream temperature in forested watersheds. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 40:197–213.[CrossRef]

Tabacchi, E., L. Lambs, H. Guilloy, A.M. Planty-Tabacchi, E. Muller and H. Decamps 2000. Impacts of riparian vegetation on hydrological processes. Hydrological Processes 14:2959–2976.[CrossRef]

Tanaka, S.K., T.J. Zhu, J.R. Lund, R.E. Howitt, M.W. Jenkins, 2006. Climate warming and water management adaptation for California. Climatic Change 76:361–387.[CrossRef]

Tockner, K. and J.A. Stanford 2002. Riverine flood plains: Present state and future trends. Environmental Conservation 29: 308–330.[CrossRef]

Trowbridge, W.B. 2007. The role of stochasticity and priority effects in flood-plain restoration. Ecological Applications 17:1312–1324.[CrossRef][Medline]

Uesugi, A. and M. Murakami 2007. Do seasonally fluctuating aquatic subsidies influence the distribution pattern of birds between riparian and upland forests? Ecological Research 22:274–281.[CrossRef]

U.S. General Accountability Office 2007. Climate change: Agencies should develop guidance for addressing the effects on Federal land and water resources. U.S. General Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters GAO-07-863.

Vicuna, S. and J.A. Dracup 2007. The evolution of climate change impact studies on hydrology and water resources in California. Climatic Change 82:327–350.[CrossRef]

Wilcove, D.S. and J. Lee 2004. Using economic and regulatory incentives to restore endangered species: Lessons learned from three new programs. Conservation Biology 18:639–645.[CrossRef]

Wipfli, M.S. 1997. Terrestrial invertebrates as salmonid prey and nitrogen sources in streams: Contrasting old-growth and young-growth riparian forests in southeastern Alaska, USA. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54:1259–1269.

Zedler, J.B. and S. Kercher 2004. Causes and consequences of invasive plants in wetlands: Opportunities, opportunists, and outcomes. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 23:431–452.[CrossRef]

Zedler, J.B. and S. Kercher 2005. Wetland resources: Status, trends, ecosystem services, and restorability. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30:39–74.[CrossRef]





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seavy, N. E.
Right arrow Articles by Weigand, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Copyright 2009 by The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System