Ecological Restoration Masters Biodiversity Spain
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Ecological Rest. 27(2):178-186 (2009); doi:10.3368/er.27.2.178
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phalen, K. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Review

An Invitation for Public Participation in Ecological Restoration: The Reasonable Person Model

Kimberly Bosworth Phalen


   Abstract
TOP
 Abstract
References
 
Public support plays a critical role in the completion and long-term success of ecological restoration projects. However, gaining this support has been a challenge in some cases. Local citizens have not always responded positively to restoration despite its touted benefits. In this article, I apply a theory of human behavior, motivation, and cognition called the Reasonable Person Model (RPM) in order to show how participation can be an effective part of restoration efforts. Using two case studies from Chicago, I discuss some of the issues that arise in restoration projects and how RPM may address them. This model identifies three important human needs, which when met contribute to more cooperative, reasonable behavior: cognitive map-building, meaningful action, and being effective. I demonstrate how RPM can be used to explain people’s reactions to restoration efforts and why participation works better in some cases than in others. I also present strategies based on RPM to promote more effective participation in restoration efforts.

Keywords: Chicago Wilderness, ecological restoration, Montrose Point, public participation, Reasonable Person Model


   References
TOP
 Abstract
 References
 

Anonymous. 2007. Cook County president lifts restoration moratorium. Chicago Wilderness Winter. www.chicagowildernessmag.org/issues/winter2007/news/restoration.html

Barro, S.C. and A.D. Bright 1998. Public views on ecological restoration: A snapshot from the Chicago area. Restoration & Management Notes 16:59–65.

Berman, M., J. Jonides and S. Kaplan 2008. The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science 19:1207–1212.[Free Full Text]

Chase, W.G. and H.A. Simon 1973. The mind’s eye in chess. Pages 215–281in W.G. Chase (ed), Visual Information Processing . New York: Academic Press.

ChicagoLand Online Nature Knowledge (CLONK). 2000. Natural areas restoration in Cook County Forest Preserves: People working together to help nature. The unofficial Cook County Forest Preserve District page. users. rcn.com/clonk/CCFPD/NaturalAreas/index.html

Cimprich, B. 1992. Attentional fatigue following breast cancer surgery. Research in Nursing and Health 15:199–207.[CrossRef]

Cimprich, B. 1993. Development of an intervention to restore attention in cancer patients. Cancer Nursing 16:83–92.[Medline]

De Groot, A.D. 1965. Thought and Choice in Chess . Trans. and ed. De Groot, A.D. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.

Ghioto, G. 2000. Forest thinning foiled again. Arizona Daily Sun October 27. hdl.handle.net/2019/91

Gobster, P.H. 1997. The Chicago Wilderness and its Critics: III. The other side; A survey of the arguments. Restoration & Management Notes 15:32–37.

Gobster, P.H. and S.C. Barro 2000. Negotiating nature: Making restoration happen in an urban park context. Pages 185–207 in P.H. Gobster and R.B. Hill (eds), Restoring Nature .

Gobster, P.H. and R.B. Hill 2000. Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities . Washington DC: Island Press.

Grese, R.E., R. Kaplan, R.L. Ryan and J. Buxton 2000. Psychological benefits of volunteering in stewardship programs. Pages 265–280 in P.H. Gobster and R.B. Hill (eds), Restoring Nature .

Hartig, T., M. Mang and G.W. Evans 1991. Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment and Behavior 23:3–26.[Abstract]

Helford, R.M. 2000. Constructing nature as constructing science: Expertise, activist science, and public conflict in the Chicago Wilderness. Pages 119–142 in P.H. Gobster and R.B. Hill (eds), Restoring Nature .

Jordan, W.R. III. 1997. The Chicago Wilderness and its critics: Progress and controversy on a restoration frontier. Restoration & Management Notes 15:16.

Kaplan, R. 1993. Physical models in decision making for design: Theoretical and methodological issues. Pages 61–86 in R.W. Marans and D. Stokols (eds), Environmental Simulation: Research and Policy Issues . New York: Plenum Press.

Kaplan, R and S. Kaplan 1989a. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective . New York: Cambridge University Press. Repr., Ann Arbor MI: Ulrich’s, 1995

Kaplan, R and S. Kaplan 2005. Preference, restoration, and meaningful action in the context of nearby nature. Pages 271–298 in P.F. Barlett (eds), Urban Place: Reconnecting with the Natural World . Cambridge: MIT Press.

Kaplan, R., S. Kaplan, K. Bosworth, L. Kumler, R. Ryan, W. Sullivan and N. Wells 2008. Participation as a Social and Personal Good . Burlington VT: International Association for Society & Natural Resources.

Kaplan, R., S. Kaplan and R.L. Ryan 1998. With People in Mind: Design and Management of Everyday Nature. Washington DC: Island Press.

Kaplan, S and R. Kaplan 1978. Humanscape: Environments for People . Belmont CA: Duxbury. Repr., Ann Arbor MI: Ulrich’s, 1982

Kaplan, S and R. Kaplan 1982. Cognition and Environment: Functioning in an Uncertain World . New York: Praeger. Repr., Ann Arbor MI: Ulrich’s, 1989

Kaplan, S. and R. Kaplan 1989b. The visual environment: Public participation in design and planning. Journal of Social Issues 45:59–86.

Kaplan, S. and R. Kaplan 2003. Health, supportive environments, and the Reasonable Person Model. American Journal of Public Health 93:1484–1489.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kuo, F.E. and W.C. Sullivan 2001. Aggression and violence in the inner city: Effects of environment via mental fatigue. Environment and Behavior 33: 543–571.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lambert, A. 1999. Shifting paradigms: The heart in restoration education. Ecological Restoration 17:126–135.[Free Full Text]

Marler, M.J., K. Supplee, M. Wessner and G. Marks 2005. Changing attitudes about grassland conservation in Missoula, Montana—"Weed capital of the west." Ecological Restoration 23:29–34.[Free Full Text]

Miles, I., W.C. Sullivan and F.E. Kuo 2000. Psychological benefits of volunteering for restoration projects. Ecological Restoration 18:218–227.[Free Full Text]

Miller, J.R. and R.J. Hobbs 2002. Conservation where people live and work. Conservation Biology 16:330–337.[CrossRef]

Nassauer, J.I. 1995. Messy ecosystems, orderly frames. Landscape Journal 14: 161–170.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ostergren, D.M., J.B. Abrams and K.A. Lowe 2008. Fire in the forest: Public perceptions of ecological restoration in north-central Arizona. Ecological Restoration 26:51–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ross, L.M. 1997. The Chicago Wilderness and its critics: I. The Chicago Wilderness; A coalition for urban conservation. Restoration & Management Notes 15:17–24.

Sauer, L, Andropogon Associates. 1998. The North Woods of Central Park. Pages 195–209 in L. Sauer, Andropogon Associates (eds), The Once and Future Forest: A Guide to Forest Restoration Strategies . Washington DC: Island Press.

Schroeder, H. 2000. The restoration experience: Volunteers’ motives, values, and concepts of nature. Pages 247–264 in P.H. Gobster and R.B. Hill (eds), Restoring Nature.

Shore, D. 1997. The Chicago Wilderness and its critics: II. Controversy erupts over restoration in Chicago area. Restoration & Management Notes 15:25–31.

Siewers, A. 1998. Making the quantum culture leap: Reflections on the Chicago controversy. Restoration & Management Notes 16:8–15.

Society for Ecological Restoration International Science & Policy Working Group (SER). 2004. The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration, vers. 2. www.ser.org & Tucson AZ: Society for Ecological Restoration International. www.ser.org/pdf/primer3.pdf

Taylor, A.F., F.E. Kuo and W. Sullivan 2002. Views of nature and self-discipline: Evidence from inner city children. Journal of Environmental Psychology 22:49–63.[CrossRef]

Tennessen, C.M. and B. Cimprich 1995. Views to nature: Effects on attention. Journal of Environmental Psychology 15:77–85.[CrossRef]

Woodall, C., A. Handler and L. Broberg 2000. Social dilemmas in grassland restoration: Integrating ecology and community on a Montana mountainside. Ecological Restoration 18:39–44.[Free Full Text]





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phalen, K. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Copyright 2009 by The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System