HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Herbst, D. B. Articles by Kane, J. M. Search for Related Content

Responses of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates to Stream Channel Reconstruction in a Degraded Rangeland Creek in the Sierra Nevada

	Abstract

TOP Abstract References

 
Streams on western rangelands are sometimes degraded to the point that reestablishing lost ecological values requires rebuilding their physical structure, shape, and form. We evaluated the biological response to reconstruction of a small rangeland stream channel through comparisons of aquatic invertebrate communities before and after engineering activities and in relation to local and regional reference stream conditions. We measured geomorphic and riparian habitat features along with benthic macroinvertebrates for two years prior to restoration actions and for two years afterward. Stream restoration activities included the construction of a new channel to replace an incised meadow stream reach (including addition of coarse rock substrate, erosion control fabric, and willow planting) and the rehabilitation of gullies and roads in the meadow and its watershed. In postproject monitoring, we found statistically significant changes in the macroinvertebrate community and trophic structure at the restored site. These were exhibited as increases in EPT taxa (mayflies, stoneflies, caddisflies) and the proportion and diversity of sensitive taxa, decreased tolerant taxa, and an increase in consumers of riparian organic matter (shredders) and decrease in fine organic particle filter-feeders. A site monitored downstream of the restoration activities exhibited increased deposition of fines and sand one year after project construction, but was similar to preproject conditions in the second year, and the macroinvertebrate community was unchanged. Improved biological integrity at the restored site showed that rapid recovery can occur in rebuilt streams within rehabilitated watersheds, but neither degraded nor enhanced conditions were transferred to downstream habitat, at least over the initial postproject period.

Keywords: livestock grazing impacts, macroinvertebrate bioassessment, rangeland improvement, Sierra Nevada, stream restoration

	References

TOP Abstract References

 

Agouridis, C.T., S.R. Workman, R.C. Warner and G.D. Jennings. 2005. Livestock grazing management impacts on stream water quality: A review. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 41:591–606.[CrossRef]

Alexander, G.G. and J.D. Allan. 2006. Stream restoration in the Upper Midwest, USA. Restoration Ecology 14:595–604.[CrossRef]

Barbour, M.T., J. Gerritsen, B.D. Snyder and J.B. Stribling. 1999. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Wadeable Stream and Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates, and Fish , 2nd ed. EPA 841-B-99-002. Washington DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water. www.epa.gov/owowwtr1/monitoring/rbp/index.html

Barton, B.A.. 1977. Short-term effects of highway construction on limnology of a small stream in southern Ontario. Freshwater Biology 7:99–108.[CrossRef]

Bash, J.M. and C.M. Ryan. 2002. Stream restoration and enhancement projects: Is anyone monitoring? Environmental Management 29:877–885.[Medline]

Belsky, A.J., A. Matzke and S. Uselman. 1999. Survey of livestock influences on stream and riparian ecosystems in the western United States. Journal of Soil & Water Conservation 54:419–431.

Bernhardt, E.S., M.A. Palmer, J.D. Allan, G. Alexander, K. Barnas, S. Brooks, J. Carr, S. Clayton, C. Dahm, J. Follstad-Shah, D. Galat, S. Gloss, P. Goodwin, D. Hart, B. Hassett, R. Jenkinson, S. Katz, G.M. Kondolf, P.S. Lake, R. Lave, J.L. Meyer, T.K. O’Donnell, L. Pagano, B. Powell and E. Sudduth. 2005. Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts. Science 308:636–637.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Biggs, J., A. Corfield, P. Gron, H.O. Hansen, D. Walker, M. Whitfield and P. Williams. 1998. Restoration of the rivers Brede, Cole and Skerne: A joint Danish and British EU-LIFE demonstration project; V–Short-term impacts on the conservation value of aquatic macroin-vertebrate and macrophyte assemblages. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8:241–255.[CrossRef]

Bond, N.R. and P.S. Lake. 2003. Local habitat restoration in streams: Constraints on the effectiveness of restoration for stream biota. Ecological Management & Restoration 4:193–198.[CrossRef]

Cummins, K.W. and M.J. Klug. 1979. Feeding ecology of stream invertebrates. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 10:147–172.[CrossRef]

Extence, C.A.. 1978. Effects of motorway construction on an urban stream. Environmental Pollution 17:245–252.[CrossRef]

Fossati, O., J.G. Wasson, C. Hery, G. Salinas and R. Marin. 2001. Impact of sediment releases on water chemistry and macroinvertebrate communities in clear water Andean streams (Bolivia). Archiv für Hydrobiologie 151:33–50.

Friberg, N., B. Kronvang, H.O. Hansen and L.M. Svendsen. 1998. Long-term, habitat-specific response of a macroin-vertebrate community to river restoration. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8:87–99.[CrossRef]

Harrison, S.S.C., J.L. Pretty, D.J. Shepherd, A.G. Hildrew, C. Smith and R.D. Hey. 2004. The effect of instream rehabilitation structures on macroinvertebrates in lowland rivers. Journal of Applied Ecology 41:1140–1154.[CrossRef]

Hawkins, C.P.. 1986. Pseudo-understanding of pseudoreplication: A cautionary note. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 67:184–185.

Herbst, D.B. and E.L. Silldorff. 2006. Comparison of the performance of different bioassessment methods: Similar evaluations of biotic integrity from separate programs and procedures. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 25:513–530.[CrossRef]

Hynes, H.B.N.. 1973. The effects of sediment on the biota of running waters. Pages 653–663 in Fluvial Processes and Sedimentation . Ottawa: National Research Council.

Jansson, R., H. Backx, A.J. Boulton, M. Dixon, D. Dudgeon, F.M.R. Hughes, K. Nakamura, E.H. Stanley and K. Tockner. 2005. Stating mechanisms and refining criteria for ecologically successful river restoration: A comment on Palmer et al. (2005). Journal of Applied Ecology 42:223–227.[CrossRef]

Jones, A.. 2000. Effects of cattle grazing on North American arid ecosystems: A quantitative review. Western North American Naturalist 60:155–164.

Kauffman, J.B., R.L. Beschta, N. Otting and D. Lytjen. 1997. An ecological perspective of riparian and stream restoration in the western United States. Fisheries 22:12–24.

Kauffman, J.B. and W.C. Krueger. 1984. Livestock impacts on riparian ecosystems and stream management implications: A review. Journal of Range Management 37:430–437.[CrossRef]

Kondolf, G.M.. 1993. Lag in stream channel adjustment to livestock exclosure, White Mountains, California. Restoration Ecology 1:226–230.[CrossRef]

Kondolf, G.M.. 1995. Five elements for effective evaluation of stream restoration. Restoration Ecology 3:133–136.[CrossRef]

Kondolf, G.M.. 1998. Lessons learned from river restoration projects in California. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8:39–52.[CrossRef]

Kondolf, G.M. and M. Larson. 1995. Historical channel analysis and its application to riparian and aquatic habitat restoration. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 5:109–126.[CrossRef]

Kondolf, G.M. and E.R. Micheli. 1995. Evaluating stream restoration projects. Environmental Management 19:1–15.

Lake, P.S.. 2001. On the maturing of restoration: Linking ecological research and restoration. Conservation Biology 13:1447–1453.[CrossRef]

Larson, M.G., D.B. Booth and S.A. Morley. 2001. Effectiveness of large woody debris in stream rehabilitation projects in urban basins. Ecological Engineering 18:211–226.[CrossRef]

Lenat, D.R., D.L. Penrose and K.W. Eagleson. 1981. Variable effects of sediment addition on stream benthos. Hydrobiologia 79:187–194.[CrossRef]

Lepori, F., D. Palm and B. Malmqvist. 2005. Effects of stream restoration on ecosystem functioning: Detritus retentiveness and decomposition. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:223–227.[CrossRef]

McCune, B. and J.B. Grace. 2002. Analysis of Ecological Communities . Gleneden Beach OR: MjM Software Design.

Merritt, R.W. and K.W. Cummins. 1996. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America , 3rd ed. Dubuque IA: Kendall/Hunt.

Moerke, A.H., K.J. Gerard, J.A. Latimore, R.A. Hellenthal and G.A. Lamberti. 2004. Restoration of an Indiana, USA, stream: Bridging the gap between basic and applied lotic ecology. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 23:647–660.[CrossRef]

Moerke, A.H. and G.A. Lamberti. 2004. Restoring stream ecosystems: Lessons from a Midwestern state. Restoration Ecology 12:327–334.[CrossRef]

Muotka, T., R. Paavola, A. Haapala, M. Novikmec and P. Laasonen. 2002. Long-term recovery of stream habitat structure and benthic invertebrate communities from instream restoration. Biological Conservation 105:243–253.[CrossRef]

National Research Council (NRC). 1992. Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems . Washington DC: National Academy Press.

National Water and Climate Center (NWCC). 1999. California monthly precipitation averages: 1961–1990 (inches). Natural Resources Conservation Service. ftp.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/data/snow/ads/ca/ca6190pr.html

Negishi, J.N. and J.S. Richardson. 2003. Responses of organic matter and macroinvertebrates to placements of boulder clusters in a small stream of southwestern British Columbia, Canada. Canadian Journal of Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences 60:247–258.[CrossRef]

Noss, R.F. and A.Y. Cooperrider. 1994. Saving Nature’s Legacy: Protecting and Restoring Biodiversity . Washington DC: Island Press.

Oksanen, L.. 2001. Logic of experiments in ecology: Is pseudoreplication a pseudo-issue? Oikos 94:27–38.[CrossRef]

Palmer, M.A., R.F. Ambrose and N.L. Poff. 1997. Ecological theory and community restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 5:291–300.[CrossRef]

Palmer, M.A., E.S. Bernhardt, J.D. Allan, P.S. Lake, G. Alexander, S. Brooks, J. Carr, S. Clayton, C.N. Dahm, J. Follstad Shah, D.L. Galat, S.G. Loss, P. Goodwin, D.D. Hart, B. Hassett, R. Jenkinson, G.M. Kondolf, R. Lave, J.L. Meyer, T.K. O'Donnell, L. Pagano and E. Sudduth. 2005. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:208–217.[CrossRef]

Platts, W.S., C. Armour, G.D. Booth, M. Bryant, J.L. Bufford, P. Cuplin, S. Jensen, G.W. Lienkaemper, G.W. Minshall, S.B. Monson, R.L. Nelson, J.R. Sedell and J.S. Tuhy. 1987. Methods for evaluating riparian habitats with applications to management. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report INT-221.

Rosenberg, D.M. and A.P. Wiens. 1978. Effects of sediment addition on macrobenthic invertebrates in a northern Canadian river. Water Research 12:753–763.

Sarr, D.A.. 2002. Riparian livestock exclosure research in the western United States: A critique and some recommendations. Environmental Management 30:516–526.[Medline]

Sidle, R.C. and A. Sharma. 1996. Stream channel changes associated with mining and grazing in the Great Basin. Journal of Environmental Quality 25:1111–1121.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sokal, R.R. and F.J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry , 3rd ed. New York: W.H. Freeman & Co.

Stewart, K.W. and B.P. Stark. 2002. Nymphs of North American Stonefly Genera (Plecoptera) , 2nd ed. Columbus OH: Caddis Press.

Strand, M. and R.W. Merritt. 1999. Impacts of livestock grazing activities on stream insect communities and the riverine environment. American Entomologist 45:13–29.

Suren, A.M. and S. McMurtrie. 2005. Assessing the effectiveness of enhancement activities in urban streams: II. Responses of invertebrate communities. River Research & Applications 21:439–453.[CrossRef]

Thorp, J.H. and A.P. Covich. 2001. Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates , 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press.

Tikkanen, P., P. Laasonen, T. Muotka, A. Huhta and K. Kuusela. 1994. Short-term recovery of benthos following disturbance from stream habitat rehabilitation. Hydrobiologia 273:121–130.[CrossRef]

Trimble, S.W. and A.C. Mendel. 1995. The cow as a geomorphic agent—A critical review. Geomorphology 13:233–253.[CrossRef]

Underwood, A.J.. 1994. On beyond BACI: Sampling designs that might reliably detect environmental disturbances. Ecological Applications 4:3–15.[CrossRef]

USDA Forest Service. 2000. Bagley Valley project: Stream and meadow restoration, Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest: Carson Ranger District. Carson City NV: USDA Forest Service.

Wallace, J.B. and M.E. Gurtz. 1986. Response of Baetis Mayflies (Ephemeroptera) to catchment logging. American Midland Naturalist 115:25–41.[CrossRef]

Waters, T. 1995. Sediment in Streams: Sources, Biological Effects and Control . Monograph 7.Bethesda MD: American Fisheries Society.

Wiggins, G.B.. 1996. Larvae of the North American Caddisfly Genera (Trichoptera) , 2nd ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Zar, J.H.. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis , 4th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Herbst, D. B. Articles by Kane, J. M. Search for Related Content